Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

3 Out Of 4 Appealed Claims To Bva - Success!

Rate this topic


Troy Spurlock

Recommended Posts

Recently found out the VARO gave the veteran I am helping 0% for the acne vulgaris until a C&P examiner can determine any reoccurring symptoms and whether or not any scaring and/or deformation is present.

Well I can tell you he does have scarring, his neck is deformed from it, and he has reoccurring symptoms of the chloracne, the the va sees it has acne vulgaris. Anyhow, if everything goes well and the doctor writes it up correctly...fingers cross they will give him 10% backdated to May 2007.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Recently found out the VARO gave the veteran I am helping 0% for the acne vulgaris until a C&P examiner can determine any reoccurring symptoms and whether or not any scaring and/or deformation is present.

Well I can tell you he does have scarring, his neck is deformed from it, and he has reoccurring symptoms of the chloracne, the the va sees it has acne vulgaris. Anyhow, if everything goes well and the doctor writes it up correctly...fingers cross they will give him 10% backdated to May 2007.

Troy,

I hope they evaluate under 7804

7828 Acne:

Deep acne (deep inflamed nodules and pus-filled cysts) affecting 40 percent or more of the face and neck ..30

Deep acne (deep inflamed nodules and pus-filled cysts) affecting less than 40 percent of the face and neck, or; deep acne other than on the face and neck .. 10

Superficial acne (comedones, papules, pustules, superficial cysts) of any extent ..0 Or rate as disfigurement of the head, face, or neck (DC 7800) or scars (DC's 7801, 7802, 7803, 7804, or 7805), depending upon the predominant disability.

7804 Scar(s), unstable or painful: Five or more scars that are unstable or painful . . . 30

Three or four scars that are unstable or painful . . . 20

One or two scars that are unstable or painful . . . 10

Note (1):An unstable scar is one where, for any reason, there is frequent loss of covering of skin over the scar.

Note (2):If one or more scars are both unstable and painful, add 10 percent to the evaluation that is based on the total number of unstable or painful scars

Note (3):Scars evaluated under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802, or 7805 may also receive an evaluation under this diagnostic code, when applicable

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thanks Carlie, I just got a copy of his C&P the other day and I will have to review it know the DC comes the doctor used and cross reference with your information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I advocated for two buddies of mine from Vietnam. They were so happy to get anything from the VA. I was anxious for them to really ask for more and not settle for the first thing the VA granted them. It is hard work doing claims for others, and much is lost in translation if you are doing it over the phone, or at long distance. One buddy got 40% for DMII and should be 100% for his heart as well. The other buddy is 30% for PTSD and has a claim in for DMII. Both should be 100%, and every time I call or write them I encourage them to appeal or get an IMO. Both are afraid the VA is going to take the money back and both have been poor for many years. Time is a real killer. One buddy is facing a death sentence and the VA is just dragging their heels. He lives some place in Idaho.

Troy, do you work through an organization or on your own? I worked through AL for about 6 months as local post officer and not a paid claims guy. I got a woman trying to claim benefits for a husband who had never even been in the service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

I advocate on my own and not with any state or federal VA, they're too corrupt and most VSOs are lazy, at least those I've come across and heard about.

Encourage the gentlemen to keep filing/appealing, doing so isn't going to make them lose their benefits. That only happens if it can be medically proven that they are better (meaning the rated condition no longer exists), which is most unlikely to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use