Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Finally A Decision, "denied"

Rate this question


vetswifeIndy

Question

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Reasons for Decision

1. Service connection for anxiety disorder, NOS )claimed as post traumatic stress disorder.

In order to establish service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder )PTSD), VA must have medical evidence supporting a clear diagnosis of the condition, credible evidence that the claimed in-service stressor actually occured and medical evidence a link between the current symptomatology and the calimed in-service stressor.

If the claimed stressor is related to combat, service department evidence that the beteran engaged in combat or that the veteran was awarded the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, or similiar combat citation will be accepted, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, as conclusive evidence of the claimed in-service stressor. Additionally, if the claimed stressor is related to the claimant having been a prisoner-of-war, prisoner-of -war experience satisfies the requirements in the absence of evidence to the contrary, as conclusive evidence of the claimed in-service stressor.

Pursuant to the amended rules of new 38 CFR3.304 (f)(3), service connection for PTSD may be granted if the evidence demonstrates a current diagnosis of PTSD (rendered by an examiner specified by the regulation ); as in -srvice stressor consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of service (satisfactorily established by lay testimony) has been medically related to the fear of hostile military or terrorist aactivity by a VA psychiatrist or psychologist, or one contracted with by VA; and the PTSD symptoms have been medically related to the in-service stressor by a VA psychologist, or one contracted with by VA.

Review of your service records does not show you engaged in combat with the enemy, or were treated for PTSD or other mental health disability while in service. You are claiming PTSD as a result of your service in Vietnam. This information meets the criteria as allowed under the amended rules related to the fear of hostile military or terrorist activity, therefore a VA examination was requested.

The examiner determined you do not have a diagnosis of PTSD. A diagnosis of PTSD must meet all diagnostic criteria as stated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association. The evidence does not show a confimed diagnosis of PTSD related to military service which would permit a finding of service connection.

The examiner found you have a diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder, NOS. The availiable evidence is insufficient to confirm a link between current diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder, NOS and an in- service stressr. We have determined the information required to corroborate the stressful events you have described is insufficient to send to Joint Services Records Research Center and insufficient to allow for meaningful research, We are not able to verify in-service stressors related to military service and your current diagonsis, therefore service connectioon for Anxiety Disorder. NOS (claimed as post traumatic stress disorder) is denied.

What is ironic about this ruling is. my husband has been on MH meds for years. Has seen VA psychiatrist and psychologist for a couple of yrs, now.

VetswifeIndy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Appeal! My good friend in Vietnam got 30% for PTSD just on his word and his appearance. He was one nervous guy and depressed guy in Vietnam I know that. He ETS'ed right out of Vietnam so he had no mental health record in service that I know of unless in basic or AIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is the diagnosis of his VA dr? PTSD or anxiety? If he says PTSD then this c&p is not valid. The c&p doc should have determined if your husbands PTSD was related to service or not. He should not have changed the diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to go to the ROI and get his a copy of his medical records and a see what DX he has and then see what meds he was taking.

If there is no DX of PTSD by any of his doctors then it will not fly.

Good luck to you! Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use