Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Reporter Explains ‘Complete Dysfunctionality’ Of Veterans Affairs Disability Backlog

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/31/reporter-explains-complete-dysfunctionality-of-veterans-affairs-disability-backlog/

During an appearance on MSNBC, Aaron Glantz of the Center for Investigative Reporting explained why the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs was failing to process so many disability benefits claims.

“The central problem facing the VA is that they’re not able to deal with this flood of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans coming home at the same time that a lot of Vietnam veterans are finally being allowed to claim illnesses caused by Agent Orange,” he said. “This is a paperwork problem. You know, they have so much paperwork that they just simply can’t put it through.”

Glantz reported earlier this month that the number of veterans waiting more than a year for their benefits increased more than 2,000 percent from 2009 to 2012. There are currently about 900,000 veterans waiting to receive their benefits.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • In Memoriam

They are only doing what they are told and are paid for. Firing them would mean that they are incompetent. There are very few of us left that believe that this is because of incompetence. This is and has always been deliberate. These delays are caused from the top not the bottom.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, a paper-based system requires humans to scan through documents, make connections to claimed issues, summarize and decide. The next person in line has to do the same thing when reviewing the decision. So what you have are people reading the same information over and over again, for more and more claims. This is a black hole process. If the information were digitized, informatics would allow those responsible for making decisions to scan for key words and phrases, dates, etc. and summarize then decides and store the decision and connections within the files. They would still have the problem of a human reviewer either missing or dismissing what's in the files, but at least the next person reviewing the claim wouldn't have to duplicate the effort of the first person PLUS add his or her own comments and decisions. Imagine having to do your taxes paper-based, then having your spouse review your paper-based stuff, then having the IRS review your paper-based stuff. So much high-touch, low-tech going on that human inefficiency alone bogs the process down.

I think the VA's approach to having at least a scanned system with OCR built in at least helps reduce the search and verify portion of the rating process. It would also hopefully scan for co-morbid conditions that the veteran may not realize exist but are presented in previous claims and medical records. A cross-check between the two VA systems (VAROs and VAMCs) might well add claims for veterans resulting in a better overall claim/health picture. I know, I'm dreaming, but what if????

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

This is not true. The IRAQ/Afghanastan Wars involve a mere fraction of the Veterans involved in Vietnam. I get so tired of the VA blaming the wars for their ineptness. They blame anything and everything, including Veterans for applying for too many benefits. The VA is the one that made this a complex nightmare.

approx Casualties in Vietnam 67,000

approx Casualties in Iraq 4000

The problem is not the wars, its an inept and corrupt VA. There were far, far more troops serving in Vietnam than there were in IRAQ Afghanastan combined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you pete992, the VA can not keep up with all the paperwork that they have created. It seems like they create a form and create another form to cancell the first one. The 21-526 is way to long, confusing and I can see a recently discharged veteran trying to figure it out. And I agree with the other posts that it all comes from the top, not the bottom. I still believe they are guarding the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

By blaming wars, Veterans, regulations, paperwork, etc for the backlog, this absolves the VA responsibility to fix it. They can just point to someone else and say, "The backlog is the fault of Veterans, for submitting too many claims, or for joining up in the war, and then asking for benefits."

When we buy into the VA's "blame game" they are fixing the blame when they should be fixing the problem. It never works. They have to own their mistakes and then fix them. Its the only way that works. The blame game fails every time.

It is like an alcoholic blaming his spouse, his parents, his boss, his kids, his background, or his race for his alcoholism. Until/unless he owns up to it, the problem wont be fixed.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use