Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Expedites Decisions For Long-Standing Claims

Rate this question


kevin4998

Question

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=119826

I know this has been posted already, but I do have a question or two. Maybe its too soon to tell what is going to happen (if anything at all) once this starts rolling out.

"Effective today, VA claims raters will make provisional decisions on the oldest claims on hand, officials said, which will allow veterans to begin collecting compensation benefits more quickly, if eligible."

As I read that sentence, that is telling me that this provisional decision will happen regardless if a veteran agrees with it or not. And, you can only pursue it for what you "think" it is worth if you have new evidence.

"If any increase is determined to be warranted based on the additional evidence received, benefits will be retroactive to the date the claim was initially filed."

Now I am pretty sure I am off base here, but that is how I am reading it.

Is that how everyone else is reading it?

Any other thoughts on this?

South Indianapolis message me if you need help, and if I can I will

I also am starting to gold pan as a hobby, and if your interested maybe we can hook up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Great link!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The appeals department is where you can really spend a decade if you go all the way. If the VA gives you a provisional decision you like well and good. If you have to appeal it is the same old jazz.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went from gathering evidence to having my claim completed partially awarding me 50% for ptsd today from when they did this and next month my claim would have been two years old so for me it seems it has worked.

Also they had screwed up and initially closed out my claim for mtbi and sensitivity to light and instead of making me wait for comp and pen to be scheduled and be waiting till the end of this year to march of next year they simply made a decision on what they did have evidence on which was ptsd,and my shoulder and ankle then sent my claim back to gathering evidence while they wait for my C&P so I didn't have to file a NOD nor wait even longer so I personally think its been great.

Edited by WhyMista

Zaidon, Karmah, Fallujah

Operation Southern Fire

2/2 Easy Co Warlords

OIF III

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

The VA's "accuracy" numbers are bogus. To determine "accuracy" the VA divides the number of "Non" appeals by the number of claims filed. Because a Veteran did not appeal, this does not mean the claim is "accurate". It means the Veteran did not appeal.

There are many many reasons the Veteran fails to appeal. First, he may be talked out of appealing by his VSO. Next, the VA may shred, lose, or ignore the Veterans appeal, like they did mine. Of course, the Veteran may be too sick or even dead and unable to appeal. In all of these instances, the VA declares the claim "accurate". In other words if you die before you can appeal, if you are too sick, if the VA loses or shreds your appeal..the VA determines your claim was "accurate" even if the VA gave you 0 percent for having both arms and legs blown off with an IED in Iraq.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question.

'

- filed for PTSD October 2010

- current 70% approved December 2011 (50%) PTSD

- filed for IU January 2012

- denied increase/IU end of October 2012.

- filed NOD December 11, 2012

- claim date changed to December 11, 2012

- C&P exam May 23, 2013; submitted to RO May 28, 2013 with MDD added as secondary to PTSD and recommendation for Unemployability. Also have VocRehab statement of Infeasability.

- moved from Gathering to Preparation for Decision May 31, 2013

- I am officially over 180 days (actually 1 1/2 years I say)

With all that said:

1) Why is claim date changed with NODs,

2) Upon completion, will retro pay be for December 2012 and I have to fight for January 2012?

3) note: yes, I do have an attorney and they state (no matter what date, they will be fighting for 100% retro pay from my initial file date of October 2010. Because I was homeless and worse off than 50% back then)

So, please feel free to submit your thoughts and/or recommendations. By the way, Social Security claim denied twice and now in appeal. I want to request an On The Record Review Decision using my C&P exam, VocRehab Infeasability, Psychiatrist/Therapist Questionnaires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use