Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Were The Regs For Depression Claims In The 1970S?

Rate this question


bigred1

Question

hi! i am helping a family member with his ptsd claim/appeal. He initially filed a claim back in mid 1970s after about 4-5 years returning from Vietnam. He attempted suicide and was sent to the va hospital for about 2 months. There is paperwork in his cfile that he filled out for a claim for depression. He was denied based on service connection. They requested his service records from his time in Vietnam and there was no evidence of that in his records. However, there is a summary from the VA hospital stating that he had experienced depression dating back to his time in Vietnam.

We are now appealing this decision, trying to get an earlier effective date (I know this is difficult to do).

I am trying to find out what the VA was required to do back then. Should they have reviewed the hosptial records? Should they have done more other than request his service records from Vietnam?

He was rated at 30% about 2 years ago, applied for increase and is now at 70%.

Any insight?

Thanks so much & good luck to you all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

The only way for an EED for him would be by

CUE or 3.156.

Right and they are the two arguments we are preparing to make. I am trying to find more specific regulations that were in effect in the 1970s that they violated when they received the claim in the 1970s.

When I talk to the VA, they keep saying that there was no evidence of service connection. That back then, they were only required to look at his service records. And that the service records did not show anything for depression or nervous disorder. He didn't seek treatment until his hospitalization 5 years after he left vietnam. We think they are wrong. He was in the hospital and stated that he was depressed since Vietnam. Of course they don't have all of his records from his 2 month stay in the hospital. They just found a few more pages that we received the past few days. He was there for 2 months, there are statements in the hosptial records connecting it to Vietnam. So what should they have done back in 1974 with that is my question.

They just flat out denied him stating " the service medical records are negative for anything referable to the currently claimed disabilities". And "Veteran has submitted no medical evidence referable to either of the claimed conditions" the last line states " nervous and earache conditions--claimed by veteran not shown by evidence of the record".

I definitely see CUE here with regard to the correct facts were no before the adjudicator (although we are not postive whether the rating officer actually had the records in their possession and just straight up ignored the evidece or if the VA hosp didn't send them), I am also looking for specific regulations they violated that were in effect at that time to make our argument even stronger.

Any help is greatly appreciated!!

Thanks so much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He was rated at 30% about 2 years ago, applied for increase and is now at 70%"

Is the rating for the same disability he applied for in 1974?

If so does he have his complete C file?

I agree with Carlie and he would have had to have had medical evidence in 1974 of the same condition that was at least at 10% ratable for this to be a CUE.

Maybe his C file would reveal the rating sheet they used for the older denial and that might contain what a CUE could be filed on.

This however:

"He was in the hospital and stated that he was depressed since Vietnam. Of course they don't have all of his records from his 2 month stay in the hospital. They just found a few more pages that we received the past few days."

This could help set up a claim under 3.156.

The regs they denied with might well be attached to the copy of that old decision, and still in his C file.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He was rated at 30% about 2 years ago, applied for increase and is now at 70%"

Is the rating for the same disability he applied for in 1974?

If so does he have his complete C file?

I agree with Carlie and he would have had to have had medical evidence in 1974 of the same condition that was at least at 10% ratable for this to be a CUE.

Maybe his C file would reveal the rating sheet they used for the older denial and that might contain what a CUE could be filed on.

This however:

"He was in the hospital and stated that he was depressed since Vietnam. Of course they don't have all of his records from his 2 month stay in the hospital. They just found a few more pages that we received the past few days."

This could help set up a claim under 3.156.

The regs they denied with might well be attached to the copy of that old decision, and still in his C file.

Yes, we have his C file. The rating sheet from 1974 is very basic. It states:

Supplemental claim

SC for nervous condition and earaches

Rating decision of date (1969) denied s SC for left ear infection as not shown by the evidence of the record

Veteran now claims SC for nervous condition and earaches.

The service medical records are negative for anything referable to the currently claimed disabilities.

Veteran has submitted no medical evidence referable to eitehr of the claimed conditions

NERVOUS AND EARACHE CONDITIONS--claimed by veteran not shown by the evidence

Interesting that we just found a VA form 10-7131 from records in St. Louis, which is an internal form from the adjuticating officer to the VA hospital, dated 20 days before they denied his claim for nervous condition, requesting the hospital summary, special form and another form, I can't read b/c there is writing over it. He was still in the hosptial when they denied the claim. He was there for 2 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't know if he can claim PTSD in 1974 because the DX did not exist. If he had no medical DX or treatment for depression or "nerves" during his service and did not apply for benefits within a year of discharge the MDD or any other chronic mental disorder may be difficult to connect to his service. I was connected back in 1973 for a "nervous condition" schizophrenia because the VA seemed to just not have the vocabulary for anything besides personality disorder or neurosis or psychosis. I can say my rating was a sham. I was clearly 100% disabled but the VA did not even ask about that, only my hospital adjustment. I was ok in the hospital so I was only slightly disabled according to the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use