Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Drug Tests

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Oh, my primary care brings it up every time I see her. I tell her look at my records from 1982 to present date. No narcotics. Didn't even use prescribed Vicodin or Valium after foot surgery where I had bone cut and toe shortened. No pain meds after childbirth or major surgery. Told her I would snap on her if she didn't stop treating me like a common druggie. LOL. That felt good. She then explained about the VA's new policy and I went and looked it up. She then prescribed Gabapentin for my nerve pains, body aches, etc. it's not a narcotic. VA is just VA. Gotta love em

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA has been prescribing narcotics of all sorts for me for at least 8 years. Now they come saying I have a opiate dependence problem. They gave me the problem. The first time I went to the VA pain clinic in 2005 they prescribed morphine for me. Since that time they have changed to methadone, oxydodone and Fentynal patches. All they are really concerned with is that you "have" a dirty test when you get the urine test. They worry that vets sell their drugs and don't take them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is due to the epidemic of addiction to pain medication and VA announced this month their plans to reduce opiate prescriptions/addiction. There are so many abusers, that they treat us all the same. I agree it is invasive and should not be done without discussion with the patient and certainly not without cause for suspicion.

I understand this but if the VA doesn't provide a veteran any opiates then this is intrusive. I had this test done the first time I went to Neuropain and I haven't had it done since. If they were going to have me do it I would have declined the seconded time around because I don't take opiates...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand this but if the VA doesn't provide a veteran any opiates then this is intrusive. I had this test done the first time I went to Neuropain and I haven't had it done since. If they were going to have me do it I would have declined the seconded time around because I don't take opiates...

A simple urinalysis is not intrusive. There are more than drugs they can test urine for. They could be testing for std's and many other things. An mri,ct or sonogram is intrusive. Peeing into a cup is not. Almost any job is going to require one, are you going to be indigent about that intrusion because that company never issued you opiates and you think saying I don't do drugs is enough.

Zaidon, Karmah, Fallujah

Operation Southern Fire

2/2 Easy Co Warlords

OIF III

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hey, they screen for alcohol as well. If you come up dirty for street drugs it can be a problem for you and gives the VA the excuse to boot you from numerous programs. If I come up dirty for street drugs I get kicked out of opiate program no matter that I have been on it for 8 years. Can you spell "Cold Turkey". I can deal with it but it would upset my wife if I did not sleep for a week. When I signed for the opiate program I agreed to not take alcohol or any street drug. I am OK with that, but I am not sure why they would screen all others for drugs and alcohol. They may start screen for tobacco use and who knows what to deny future claims. It used to be only drunks used the VA ha, ha.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The Docs have to do this now with the DEA cracking down on the pain med prescribers. They are being treated like drug lords and eventually they will stop prescribing pain meds. Now for those who actually need the medicine, it can be a bad thing but remember you still have rights.

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use