Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Its Been A Long Road

Rate this question


adkins7b

Question

God been through hell and back twice.. not going to go into details. Brief history 10 years military 6 years honorable and 4 years OTh by admin board for a civilian conviction.

I was not given a c p exam for any of my conditions, my wife has tricare and I have been seeing navy/ civilian phyc docs since seperation.

Here is just some of my medical evidence, my honorable ended 2006. I was still on active duty 2008 had a sleep study done and this is what the front says. I have tried to upgrade it didn't work out. i think they can still use this plus i have conditions like this listed in my honorable period of service.

Mr X came to louisiana sleep diagnostics for an evaluation. He presented complaints of loss of energy, irritability, and short temper, anxiety and depression, trouble concentrating, mood and behavior changes, heavy snoring daytime somnolence, heartburn, dry throat, and an irresistible urge to move his legs while falling asleep, leg jerking, waking feeling partially rested or completely unrefreshed, a deviated septum and heartburn. He is currently using Flonase. His Epworth Sleepines Scale score is 8.

post-13879-0-05038500-1375230685_thumb.j

post-13879-0-96918400-1375230812_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Here is my bi-polar nexus letter from my civilian phyctrist that i have been seeing for 2 years.

After reviewing medical records provided by Mr x from his time in service, it apprears to be almost a certainty that symptoms of bipolar disorder, depression, and anxiety started in 2002, during him initial time in the service, related to the increase in security and military activity following the terrorist attacks in 2001.

The nexus letter says symptoms, i just caught that after i was denied but i'm not sure the reason for denial.

Do you think that my claim was filed wrong, what i'm saying is that is says bi-polar with depression, anxiety and paranoid psychosis.

A review of your service treatment records from dec 1, 1999 to may 30 th 2006 are negative for treatment or a diagnosis of bi-polar with depression, anxiety and paranoid psychosis.

I do not have bi-polar in there but I have depression and anxiety issues in there. How can they say there are no records, I picked out the ones sent them via mail, vso, and ebenefits. i was crazy sent everthing 3 times 3 ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will carefully read all this but I think you have started different posts on this issue under different topics and I replied to them and don't remember where those posts were ....one was minutes ago........on the issues of the Chronic presumptives and also the OTH .

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To clarify for all here........

VA's reference to 38 USC 1701 in this vet's decision is not the same as the Chronic Presumptive regs I posted this AM for him in another topic here:

This regulation is important and we need to keep in mind that the current war is not over yet and that so far I believe the delimiting date of Dec 16, 2016 shall be used to apply to PGW or GW or OIE/OEF veterans,regarding the last sentence of this USC 1701 regulation below. For VA Benefit purposes......

http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/gulfwar/military-service.asp

“For VA benefit purposes, Gulf War service is active military duty in any of the following areas in the Southwest Asia theater of military operations at any time during the first Gulf War starting August 2, 1990 through the Iraq War. This includes Veterans who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003-2010) and Operation New Dawn (2010-2011).

  • swa280.jpgIraq

  • Kuwait

  • Saudi Arabia

  • The neutral zone between Iraq and Saudi Arabia

  • Bahrain

  • Qatar

  • The United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.)

  • Oman

  • Gulf of Aden

  • Gulf of Oman

  • Waters of the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Sea, and the Red Sea

  • The airspace above these locations “

as noted in this following reg in the vets decision ere in the thumbnail.....

:

(2) before the end of the two-year period beginning on the last day of the Persian Gulf War.

USCTitle 38Part IIChapter 17Subchapter I › § 1702

38 USC § 1702 - Presumptions: psychosis after service in World War II and following periods of war; mental illness after service in the Persian Gulf War

Current through Pub. L. 113-21. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

(a) Psychosis.— For the purposes of this chapter, any veteran of World War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam era, or the Persian Gulf War who developed an active psychosis

(1) within two years after discharge or release from the active military, naval, or air service, and

(2) before July 26, 1949, in the case of a veteran of World War II, before February 1, 1957, in the case of a veteran of the Korean conflict, before May 8, 1977, in the case of a Vietnam era veteran, or before the end of the two-year period beginning on the last day of the Persian Gulf War, in the case of a veteran of the Persian Gulf War, shall be deemed to have incurred such disability in the active military, naval, or air service.

(b) Mental Illness.— For purposes of this chapter, any veteran of the Persian Gulf War who develops an active mental illness (other than psychosis) shall be deemed to have incurred such disability in the active military, naval, or air service if such veteran develops such disability—

(1) within two years after discharge or release from the active military, naval, or air service; and

(2) before the end of the two-year period beginning on the last day of the Persian Gulf War.

LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.

( Please correct me on that Dec 16, 2016 date...anyone......I think the date was extended after VA posted the link on the Gulf War vets ,that was the date for VA Benefit purposes.)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry............. date was December 31.2016...... for the GW Presumptives regs... not Dec 16th 2016.

In effort to clarify 38 USC 1701 as compared to the Chronic Presumptives, I think I snafued and fubared it all up the ying yangs....

sorry about that..

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm sorry i look at my content and check the other post, sorry i'm all over the place.. I am really jacked up, and highly medicated most of the time.

Thanks for the help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My CUE claim was messed around because the VA changed the regulations on how they rate psychosis and all other mental illnesses between 1972 and 1973. I filed my claim in 1972 under one set of regulations and it was rated under another set in 1973. I never knew that until 40 years later. This goes to rating chronic illnesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use