Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

On The Legal Side Couldn't This Be A Conflict Of Interest...

Rate this question


rpowell01

Question

Its my understanding that an RO is suppose to send veterans to have an independent C&P exam. If an RO is part of a system say as in St Pete, the Bay Pines system, how can they send a veteran to have a C&P exam in the Bay Pines Region only and not other regions such as Tampa or lets say Orlando. Wouldn't this be a conflict of interest because the word independent?

I am just curious about this because I see the RO using doctors in their system is a conflict of interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I think exam doctors are paid as independent contractors. Pay based on the number of examinations completed with reports. I think VA treating doctor's are paid based on the hiring quidelines and they are entitled to federal benefits as well. I am not sure exam doc's get federal employee benefits or not (I suspect not). GOOD Question. Any answers would clear up some of the muddle.- H

Veterans, unfairly, get no choice in who the VA picks to examine them. So, is this an independent examiner, not in my perspective. So if VA has their hired and paid for examiners, the Veteran (like Carly says), needs to eat bread and water for a while, to hire thier own independent examiners.

I know in workers compensation cases in most states, when there is an Independent examination needed for an injured worker, the workers compensation company in most states is required to offer a list of 3 to 5 doctors for the injured worker to pick from to do the exam. This is called and AME. Agreed Upon Medical Exam. VA could take a lesson from the AME approach. As long as all the doctor is not ultimately afiliated in some way with the VA.

I find most doctor's are afraid to stand or make a contrary opinion when the government is involved as they are afraid of audits, IRS interference, and that if they disagree with the VA , the gov't won't send any more business their way. Those doctors don't realize the gov't doesn't really care about thier opinion, they just want to process claims.- IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think C&P exams were considered Independent Opinions. I thought Independent Medical Opinions were obtained more at the BVA level. Sometimes you will read BVA decisions where the Board will refer the case to an outside medical expert for an opinion. But this is only "required" when a case involves controversy or complexity. Actually, based on the way the law reads, it doesn't even look like it is required. It is just something that is available, and up to the judgement of the Secretary.

38 USC § 5109 - Independent medical opinions

(a) When, in the judgment of the Secretary, expert medical opinion, in addition to that available within the Department, is warranted by the medical complexity or controversy involved in a case being considered by the Department, the Secretary may secure an advisory medical opinion from one or more independent medical experts who are not employees of the Department.
(b) The Secretary shall make necessary arrangements with recognized medical schools, universities, or clinics to furnish such advisory medical opinions. Any such arrangement shall provide that the actual selection of the expert or experts to give the advisory opinion in an individual case shall be made by an appropriate official of such institution.
© The Secretary shall furnish a claimant with notice that an advisory medical opinion has been requested under this section with respect to the claimant’s case and shall furnish the claimant with a copy of such opinion when it is received by the Secretary.
Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In Tampa they use residents from the USF medical School or maybe even medical students. I had mental health exams done by very young doctors over the years and now realized they were from medical school who were doing residency at the VA next door. They manage to absorb the anti-veteran bias from older C&P exam doctors. I did have exam for PN done by VA neurologist who is daughter of my private psychiatrist. I wonder if this was a conflict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just looked - and Independent Exams / Opinions can also be requested by the RO - but the request has to be approved by the Compensation and Pension Service. So it looks like Independent Opinions are very different that C&P exams, or VA medical opinions. There doesn't seem to be any law that states the medical opinions obtained by the VA have to be Independent. In fact, they have to jump through additional hoops to prove that an Independent Opinion is necessary.
§ 5.92 Independent medical opinions.
(a) General. When warranted by the
medical complexity or controversy
involved in a pending claim, an
advisory medical opinion may be
obtained from one or more medical
experts who are not employees of VA.
Opinions shall be obtained from
recognized medical schools,
universities, clinics or medical
institutions with which arrangements
for such opinions have been made, and
an appropriate official of the institution
shall select the individual expert(s) to
render an opinion.
(b) Requests. A request for an
independent medical opinion in
conjunction with a claim pending at the
regional office level may be initiated by
the office having jurisdiction over the
claim, by the claimant, or by his or her
representative. The request must be
submitted in writing and must set forth
in detail the reasons why the opinion is
necessary. All such requests shall be
submitted through the Veterans Service
Center Manager of the office having
jurisdiction over the claim, and those
requests which in the judgment of the
Veterans Service Center Manager merit
consideration shall be referred to the
Compensation and Pension Service for
approval.
© Approval. Approval shall be
granted only upon a determination by
the Compensation and Pension Service
that the issue under consideration poses
a medical problem of such obscurity or
complexity, or has generated such
controversy in the medical community
at large, as to justify solicitation of an
independent medical opinion. When
approval has been granted, the
Compensation and Pension Service
shall obtain the opinion. A
determination that an independent
medical opinion is not warranted may
be contested only as part of an appeal
on the merits of the decision rendered
on the primary issue by the agency of
original jurisdiction.
(d) Notification. The Compensation
and Pension Service shall notify the
claimant when the request for an
independent medical opinion has been
approved with regard to his or her claim
and shall furnish the claimant with a
copy of the opinion when it is received.
If, in the judgment of the Secretary,
disclosure of the independent medical
opinion would be harmful to the
physical or mental health of the
claimant, disclosure shall be subject to
the special procedures set forth in
§ 1.577 of this chapter.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(3); 38 U.S.C.
5109, 5701
Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use