Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Going Nuclear On The Va

Rate this question


usdart

Question

I turned the whole thing over to my Congressman!

I am tired of being lied to and put off and ignored by the VA rep who was supposed to help me, The VA clinic,and my VA Phsyc for leaving things out of her reports and trying to trick me.

I offered as evidence to the Congressman my Ebenefits and myhealthevet records to back up what I am saying. I let them know I trusted these people to help me because like most I did not understand the system. I let him know that I had not filed before because I was unaware of the entitlement and my family prodded me to get help. I told him I spent 10 months in turmoil and raging anxiety and was then told my Claim was totally witout evidence. Even though my VSO insisted everything was there and when I called Seattle they said they had 'all the evidence'.

I am waiting for Doc Hastings to let me know. He has helped me before with positive results from the VA in 5 days. I am hoping for good results here too. At this point if I shot myself in the foot, so be it. I only want what is due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I will keep this info in mind to use when and if I get a denial on my claim. Meanwhile I still need a VSO.

Can someone recommend DAV, or some othe agentsy with a good record?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

No, I have been disappointed by all of them! Learn how to win your own claim. IF you just hand your claim over to the DAV or VFW they just run with what you give them. It is ok to have them along at a hearing, but you must do the leg work to produce the evidence you need to win your claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This is what lawyers are for because they do know every rule and regulation. The VBA is adversarial. You can wish for a perfect world where the VA and SSA are fair, but in the meantime hire a lawyer and a good IME. Vets waited for 60 years to be able to hire lawyers and now we have the chance.

Yuppers. I completely agree. As I have been learning. The VA and health professionals that conduct themselves in this manner must be dealt with as we deal with the enemy in combat, Without discretion, without remorse. This is our new war and we must fight fire with fire. Proportional damage with even more strategic attacks. " This is war gentlemen"

Edited by arng11

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm curious, a veteran that's 100%, files a claim, used vso's from all organizations, learned how to do claims all by their selves, claim is denied at the Ro, BVA and CAVC.

My first question would be, what kind of nexus is in this veterans c-file?

just curious....

Edited by meghp0405
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm curious, a veteran that's 100%, files a claim, used vso's from all organizations, learned how to do claims all by their selves, claim is denied at the Ro, BVA and CAVC.

My first question would be, what kind of nexus is in this veterans c-file?

just curious....

I think you are asking ME...

My VSO fouled up my claim by assumeing the VA would see that I was in Viet Nam in a Artillary unit in the field under combat conditions. The VA knows that some who went to Viet Nam did not see combat. The VA wanted proof that I had been under fire in combat. My history with the VA from 1979 shows sleep problems, headaches, Alchol abuse, family and work issues. As part of my proof I sent in the Company names of the more than 50 jobs I have had since discharge. I also sent in the After Action Report for the major Offensive I was apart of in 1970. Along with newspaper accounts and two buddy statements. All this info was researched and found by ME. The VSO does not care as much about you as you do and to be fair they do not know all the small clues it takes to chase down the Evidence. Each piece of info gave clues to how to find the next etc.

That's my story and I am sssttticking to it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I think you are asking ME...

My VSO fouled up my claim by assumeing the VA would see that I was in Viet Nam in a Artillary unit in the field under combat conditions. The VA knows that some who went to Viet Nam did not see combat. The VA wanted proof that I had been under fire in combat. My history with the VA from 1979 shows sleep problems, headaches, Alchol abuse, family and work issues. As part of my proof I sent in the Company names of the more than 50 jobs I have had since discharge. I also sent in the After Action Report for the major Offensive I was apart of in 1970. Along with newspaper accounts and two buddy statements. All this info was researched and found by ME. The VSO does not care as much about you as you do and to be fair they do not know all the small clues it takes to chase down the Evidence. Each piece of info gave clues to how to find the next etc.

That's my story and I am sssttticking to it!

usdart stick to it. There is ONLY ONE real person that will care more about your claim, that is you my friend. Remember that this wonderful resource we have here is a resource. You have to use every weapon in the arsenal. There are laws and regulations that are supposed to keep things fair and just, however, as with anything, we are human, even the damn VA smucks. (the ones's that don't do right of course) It will never be a perfect system, and it is really is the luck of the draw sometimes. Stay true in your path and with some good fortune, you might wind up in a place better than you are right now. Just my opinion. Take it for what is worth to you.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use