Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New With Some Questions, Please

Rate this question


kate7772

Question

My husband is a Vietnam era Marine Corp. veteran.

He filed for disability for Membranous Glomerulonephritis /Stage 3 kidney disease, depression and tinnitus.

The kidney disease was diagnosed through his private kidney doctor and the tinnitus through VA.

The kidney disease we feel can be linked to the contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.

Everything was across the board, denied. This was filed through a veterans service officer who seemed a bit clueless to the proper way to do it. There was no Nexus letter included.

My husband plans to appeal or whatever we need to do now (just not sure.) He hasn't asked his doctor to give him a letter yet but will do so this week. Trying to get enough supporting evidence together to show the doctor so he will understand but not overwhelm him. My husband has no other factors to cause the kidney disease. I wonder if it would be a good idea to make an appointment with a VA kidney doctor to review his records also. We probably will get an IMO done also.

The tinnitus was VA diagnosed, so not sure why that was denied.

My husband claimed depression because he just knew he was miserable in so many ways but didn't know why. Now, very recently, he has been diagnosed with PTSD with major depression (still amazed that this could happen so many years after the fact but looking back through the years, there were a lot of clues.) When he took the PTSD test, he was told that he was extremely bad. The diagnosis was made by a VA clinical nurse specialist and clinical social worker. Doesn't it need to be diagnosed by a psychologist or psychiatrist? The nurse said it needs to be someone specially trained in PTSD treatment such as the social worker. They want him to do drugs (which he hates) and therapy. Could PTSD now be added as part of the depression he originally claimed or would it need to be an entirely new claim with a new start date?

I appreciate any thoughts you are able to give me on this.

Thanks,

Kate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Welcome.

On the part,

"The tinnitus was VA diagnosed, so not sure why that was denied."

Read the rating decision over several times.

The Reasons and Bases and Evidence Section, will tell you EXACTLY

how and why a decision was made - the way it was made.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

First get rid of that veterans service officer. Next, you need to link his disabilities to his service. For instance the tinnitus needs to be linked to what he did in the service. Usually continuous loud noises, the VSO should have done that. Did you or the VSO request his service medical records?. If you google "veterans administration compensation for Membranous Glomerulonephritis" you will come up with some disapproved/approved claims read them you will learn a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Agree with the advice given. Good luck to you and God bless

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

“Could PTSD now be added as part of the depression he originally claimed or would it need to be an entirely new claim with a new start date?”

Since the depression claim was denied, the new PTSD claim could certainly include the depression as part of the PTSD.

Still he should consider appealing the entire denial.

Can you scan and post the denial here, as to the VA's reasons and Bases . Cover names, address, C file number before scanning it, and it can be attached to your next post.

This seems to be a post from you at another site: but I could be wrong.

http://www.tftptf.com/v-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2638

If so have you attempted to contacted any of the list of doctors there someone suggested for an IMO?

Va 's statement on Came Lejeune disability is here:

http://www.benefits.va.gov/COMPENSATION/claims-postservice-exposures-camp_leguene_water.asp

As of January 2013 the VA had only granted 17 of the Bad water breast cancer LeJuene claims.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/18/lejeune-water-contaminated/1846971/

Maybe a few more since then.

As the Statement from VA says, these claims need medical evidence regarding the nexus to service.

That type of opinion is highly unlikely to come from any VA doctor.

The IMO criteria here in our IMO forum should be followed by the IMO doctor who should rule out any other etiology for this condition, and give a clear and strong medical rationale that the contaminated water (including the specific contaminants found), has caused your husband's disability.

Diabetes Mellitus and severe hyperrtension are two of many other possible causes of this disease.

Does he have any other documented disabilities, that could be claimed as due to service, that could also be the cause of the CKD?

Does he have a copy of his complete SMRs?

Was he stationed at LeJeune during the timeframe in the VA link here?

As claimants we can raise as many potential theories of entitlement as we want,if we feel they are strong possibilities to garner SC.

Back to the PTSD.....it appears he has a valid VA diagnosis. He needs a nexus to this claim.Meaning ,unless he has proof of combat awards on hios DD 214 ( PH, CAR,CIB, he will have to prove the stressor event , inservice, that caused his PTSD.

We have a lot of PTSD info in our PTSD forum here.

Post Traumatic means it is a delayed response and can often take many years to manifest itself to the point that it needs treatment.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Berta,

Thank you, and the others as well.

I don't currently have a scanner (need to get one.)

The rejection basically said "not service connected" for all. I realize now that his claim was very incomplete. As I said, the service officer was clueless but we were even more so. He is no longer there. Not sure why.

We did contact one of the IMO doctors and gathering info to send to him. Also considering contacting Dr. Bash. Would it be a good idea to have two opinions?

We hope my husbands doctor will do one but not sure yet. He's a very good doctor but he is Indian and doesn't seem to understand when my husband mentions the water issue. We hope he will take the time to read the research info we have.

My husband has hypertension also but it seemed to begin at the same time as the kidney issues. We didn't think much of the water/kidney connection until we were researching info on his condition and found references to possible causes being toxic chemicals, including those at Lejeune.

We were floored by the PTSD diagnosis. There were many hints throughout the years but it really manifested after he became unable to work full time due to the edema caused by the kidney disease. Since then, things have really gotten bad. My husband feels guilty about adding another condition to his claim because he sees so many veterans who appear worse off than him. He doesn't feel deserving but I am really concerned because he is having a more and more difficult time working due to the increasing PTSD symptoms as well as the kidney disease. He is only working three days a week now but each week as the time draws closer to return to work, he gets increasingly anxious and recently has started experiencing stomach pain (tests show no known cause.) He works at a job involving dealing with the public and he is messing up a lot and forgetting things.

I was hoping we could add the PTSD to the depression he originally claimed (didn't know what to call it originally, just knew he was extremely depressed.) If he asks for a reconsideration, could the PTSD just be included in that under the depression. I know if takes so much longer to do a new claim.

This whole thing is so difficult to navigate and do things the right way. Then, if you mess up, it only adds to the wait. So grateful there are sites like this available.

Kate

Edited by kate7772
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use