Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Good News From Bva, But Now What?

Rate this question


KBH

Question

The BVA granted entitlement to service connection for Multiple Sclerosis. But remanded the claim for TDUI saying the RO incorrectly stated that the issue was intertwined with the service connection claim.

REMAND-Given the grant of service connection for multiple sclerosis within the instant Board decision, the veteran claim for TDUI should be again addressed by the RO following the assignment of a disability rating to this disorder and any additional development needed.

I have been granted SSDI and Fers retirements.

Any ideas on what the RO may do with this or whether there is another long wait In store for me here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Carlie is 100% correct!

The Fast Letter implementing processing of partial BVA awards, is here in the pdf:

KBH , you did GOOD here:

"Thanks, it took 4 years to get to this point as my MS wasn't diagnosed till 12 years after discharge."

I am assuming that you had an IMO and/or medical evidence that warranted MS ,at least at a 10% level ,during the 7 years after your discharge? (under the chronic presumptive regulations)

I even assume you might have gotten an IMO from Dr. Bash, who also has MS.

"But remanded the claim for TDUI saying the RO incorrectly stated that the issue was intertwined with the service connection claim."

Boy that is an absurd RO statement.It sounds to me that you will succeed in the TDIU, after they process and rate the MS.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

My medical retirement was due to weakness and atrophy in my right leg. I was deemed at 10% at that time. As this was one of the symptoms that eventually led to a diagnosis and documentation of my seeking medical care for the same throughout the years, the 10% diagnosis within the 7 years was met.

My IMO was done by a Neurologist in Orlando that specializes in MS. He did an excellent job of connecting the dots through the years and the board quoted him several times in their decision.

I am hoping that the RO already has enough information so that he can process and rate the MS, and follow through quickly with the TDUI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

THANKS for explaining that.......my assumptions were all wrong and you did VERY well.

"My IMO was done by a Neurologist in Orlando that specializes in MS. He did an excellent job of connecting the dots through the years and the board quoted him several times in their decision."

That is superb!

I hope everyone here reads this carefully:

"My medical retirement was due to weakness and atrophy in my right leg. I was deemed at 10% at that time. As this was one of the symptoms that eventually led to a diagnosis and documentation of my seeking medical care for the same throughout the years, the 10% diagnosis within the 7 years was met."

That is one of the BEST explanations of how the Chronic Presumptive regulations can work that I have ever read.

THANKS for that!

I hope your TDIU goes fast. Do you receive SSDI for the MS, and if so does the VA know that?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I do have both SSDI and FERS, both for MS. The VA does know. Thanks, I was wondering what you think about this statement from the BVA? My date of application has not come into question (yet).

The veteran initiated claim for TDUI in Oct 2010.

The claim for TDUI was first adjudicated in Nov 2011 SOC, which the Veteran subsequently perfected an appeal following a Mar 2012 SSOC. The board very liberally construes an Apr 2012 correspondence from her representative as a substantive appeal for her TDUI claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I think your TDIU effective date should go back to Oct, 2010. I get OPM, SSDI and TDIU. The money you will get from the VA will be double what you get from SSDI and OPM. I had 20 years in at USPS when I retired on disability back in 2002. Once you get your TDIU protect that rating. Get treatment at the VA for the MS even if you get other treatment from private doctors. Always send in your Employment Verification letter each year. If I was you I would start seeing a VA shrink to help cope with the disease. Do you take any anti-depressants. Depression is often a secondary condition for major disabilities and can be service connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I agree with John's advice

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use