Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Has An American Veteran Ever Sued Vietnam Or Korea Over Ao?

Rate this question


Ascomdepot68

Question

Just wondering if an American Veteran has ever sued (successfully or not), even filed suit, against the government of Vietnam or Korea over Agent Orange related disabilities? Know we can't sue the US federal government. The US

policy is that the AO, Agent Blue, whatever, were the property of the respective governments once it entered their space.

To me this would seem to be in addition to whatever assistance a Veteran was receiving from the US. It would also

enable a Veteran's attorney to have the power of subpoena, a real courtroom trial, etc. instead of the travesty we

must endure at present.

Maybe some large attorney group would like to open a class action suit?

Of course since it has not been done (?) there may be some real reason it hasn't happened already.

Just thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Agent Orange's devastating affects to American service personnel was caused, not by Vietnam or Korea but by the USA's DOD's acquisitions from
Dow, Monsanto, Hercules, Northwest Industries, Diamond Shamrock and North American Phillips. thechemical companies who made the AO and failed to consider it's potential affects to humans.

The class action case known as the Agent Orange Settlement Fund, involved the largest monetary settlement in the USA...180 Million...my husband and I ,after his death, received AO payments from the fund. This was in the mid 1980s when veterans (pre internet) did not have the vast ability we do today, to hear of this case and apply for part of the settlement.

Next to the AO Settlement Fund class action, only Nehmer, as a class action, affected AO vets in any substantial way as far as compensation goes.

.http://www.agentorangerecord.com/information/the_quest_for_additional_relief/

This link is a brief run down of the AO history....2 women were highly instrumental in the AO regs we have today:


"Maude De Victor, a case worker at the Veterans Affairs office in Chicago" ( also who a movie was based on ,with John Ritter)
and of course Beverly Nehmer who NVLSP represented as part of the Nehmer class Action case.

The article also mentions "The first lawsuit filed by a veteran about damage caused by Agent Orange was filed by twenty-eight-year old Paul Reutershan"

Our first Conus AO vet, James Cripps, did a SVR show here recently, and did a lot of legwork to prove he was exposed to AO at Fort Gordon.

It is the April 9th show still in the blogtalk.radio thing at the right of the main forum screen and also in the radio show archives.

Nothing is impossible, as James, and others have proved, by getting VA comp for AO for service outside of Vietnam and outside of the Korea and Thailand regs.

A Vietnamese group tried to sue the US for their disabilities due to AO a few years ago here in NY, but their suit failed.

About 9 or 10 years ago I mentioned the Blue Water AO vets to my former vet rep and he said "Who?"

He didnt have a clue.

Since then many BWN vets have had their ships put onto the AO exposure lists by proving to VA ,against all odds years ago, that they in fact were exposed to AO.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

If USA wanted to heal wounds of war in Vietnam they would compensate Vietnamese sprayed with AO. With this congress that would never happen. We admit that AO is killing our soldiers but say we have no responsibility to the people of an. Vietnam. We did not spray N. Vietnam . We sprayed the S. Vietnamese who were our allies.

I can't see S. Korea ever paying US soldiers for AO. You can sue another country in some court but you never get the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

We dumped more Blue. White and Orange up in Laos and Cambodia than we ever did in RVN. If they had to abort due to Wx, the default was the Ho Chi Minh trail. Little of it was in RVN. We also hosed our Lima Sites where vegetation on STOL runways were a problem. And yes, Neutralist areas w/ poppy fields up near Ban Sam Neua. Route 7 at the north end of the PDJ looked like goats had been grazing there. We called it the PDJ Golf and Country Club.

a

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You think we maybe committed a few war crimes in other people's countries? That was part of Nixon's secret plan to end the war. He took over in 1968 and the war ended for us in 1973. We got the same deal from the NLF that we could have gotten in 1968. I wonder why other people don't like us. Now they don't even fear us. Let's spray Ukraine with AO. Even the Russians won't want it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use