Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Pushing To Decrease Pain Medication

Rate this question


JayBrown1

Question

I recently called in a renewal of my pain medication and when I checked my doctor decrease it from 90 pills to 60. I had agreed that I would decrease it 120 to 90 until my next appointment and then we would decide if I can tolerate it at that level but just after a month and a half I told I couldn't too much pain at this point instead she decrease it without letting me know in advance. I secured message her and she told I was right and that we did say we would only drop it 30 but the VA is pushing to get veterans off of opiates and suggest that I get some bengay or capsaicin cream to help with the pain. I have been taking 2 pain meds for over 20 years now and using Capsaisin creams for over 10 years and I am still in a lot of pain and now within 2 months they have already cut my meds in half. My pain level has not been under 5 since 2004, some days I don't even get out of bed especially with the pain that runs through my legs. I had to quit working in 2008 due to severe pain.

This is scary because next the only thing I will be getting is Tylenol. I wrote in my response to my doctor that whole the VA is looking at reducing our pain meds they will create alcoholics because veterans will have to find alternatives to deal with their pain.

Has anyone else had their meds reduce!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Whatever happened to, "First, do no harm." Does this have 1151 potential?

Of course it does! To do so, impeccable record keeping will be mandatory.

Every complaint and any changes in condition need to documented, and every visit/appointment in detail.

When a medical decision is based upon a bureaucratic directive, instead of an individual patient's conditions,

the malpractice specter emerges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I had a topic about this somewhere that this was coming maybe last year and another problem why they

are doing this because of the vets been filling claims for secondary conditions and winning with this. You will be

smoking pot from VA because of no side effects.

I had my check to see how my artery disease in legs was last week and last year it was 55 % blockage and I refused

the by-pass surgery so the doc says I have good news and I rarely have this to tell my patients your legs is 87% OPEN

wth: Then he ask you still smoking no sir how about your pot yes sir then he says cigarettes is what gave you artery

disease and your pot wont hurt it at all STAY AWAY from cigarettes and come back in a year.

You have choices on different meds.I was told today by a VA doctor they will have tramadol on the list as narcotic next year

and that's so cheap you can go buy you so goodie powders. RU jmho

Edited by RUREADY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

just to add about options right now I go to Augusta for 12 weeks 1 day a week for acupuncture

for back & leg pain the first one you can tell the difference. Then I have a doctor from outsides va

that will compound a prescription into a cream and they put whatever

the doctor order in to a cream. I have gabapentin, lidocaine, clonidine, and a few more but it works.

It is also expensive. this because I just don't like to take pills so the doc put my pain,and blood pressure

together in a cream .RU

Edited by RUREADY
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

One or the other of your leg exams was bogus. Have you been to a real non VA doctor about this? You don't go from 55% blockage in legs to 87% open. Where did blockages go? Did they just dissolve? Smoking will make it much worse because it damages the arteries and makes them more narrow. The danger is , of course, that piece of blockage breaks loose and goes to lung, heart or head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

It is not just the VA that is cutting off pain meds. Here in CA the work comp system has changed they are using the utilization review system to cut off pain meds and anything else they want to cut. Then you have to go thru the IMR process which is the fox guarding the hen house. I was on 15 mg of ms contain 3 times a day dialed in helps chronic pain some days not enough but had a good quality of life. They cut that off and now flexeril and just got word they cut off my pads for a very expensive rs4i plus machine they paid for a few months back. I guess that will sit on the shelf for awhile collecting dust at 2500.00 dollars.

I have had urine test at every appointment with pain management doc's so that is not the problem. I have had two cervical surgeries that have failed and now the want to do my back and I am refusing that one. I have a service connected shoulder injury that I have not needed to get pain meds for because of the non connected injuries. Now it looks like I may not get them thru the VA.

I was in a deep depression till I got the right combination of pain meds and I fear going back to that stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, private pain doctors in Florida are afraid to prescribe necessary pain meds. I have federal worker's compensation claim. They are good at always demanding extra paperwork from doctors when you ask for anything besides cheap generics. I ask for Cymbalta from WC and they refuse and kick it back to my good WC doctor who then has to do paperwork for special authorization. He gets tired of that extra work. All insurance companies just mean to delay or deny treatment and medications to save money. The VA also acts like an insurance company. Private insurance is ruining medical care here. They are inbetween the doctor and patient. They only care about stockholders. Blue Cross is one of the worst and biggest. They just basically refuse to pay for psychiatric care via paperwork traps and mazes of rules. Half of the population is suffering from pain and/or mental disorders and insurance companies won't pay for care. Oxycontin would be good for me, but I can't get it from VA, and private docs just want to do procedures like injections and surgery. It is all about money. Doctors believe they all are entitled to be millionaires even if all they do is prescribe pills.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use