Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hadit Radio Dr Bash, John Dorley And Dr. Brett Valette Yesterday

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Did anyone here pick up on the point I was trying to get to with Dr. Valette??? as to PTSD IMOs?
and the July 13, 2010 regulations?

Unfortunately Dr Valette had to leave early and I will listen to the show again and perhaps I can contact him personally for a better explanation.

Like Dr Bash and John Dorley, he was a wonderful guest and I sure hope he does more shows with us.The time went by too fast with these GREAT men to include our fabulous Jbasser, who always keeps the shows on track! And Mike Sasser who keeps us on the Airwaves! I sure missed Jerrel there yesterday and hope all is OK with him.

I think he, Dr Valette, meant he is able to potentially recharacterize a PTSD claim via an IMO, (in situations whereby the VA will Not give a VA PTSD diagnosis), into another MH issue that could be service connected instead.
As I have mentioned here before, under the new regs, if VA wont diagnose a vet with PTSD, even an IMO from someone as astute as the deceased Sigmund Freud, wont do it either.


Of course maybe PTSD vets should start claiming more than one MH theory of entitlement to any MH issue, if they feel the VA might not DX them with PTSD......

Any thoughts?

Also for the possible few out there who read hadit and think my recent comments here about VA's other secret lists, are a little wacky, Dr Bash and John Dorley fully asserted their awareness too of these other secret lists.on yesterday's blog radio show ....and many vet lawyers I know are getting up to speed on that as well.

I feel vindicated because I know it does seem far fetched to many who are here to believe VA has other secret lists......too I explained them on a show I did here in late May I think it was.

The waiting lists and bogus backlog figures are bad enough but they are only part of the iceberg

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

A vet could claim depression, anxiety disorder (GAD), dissociative disorder, and even schizophrenia if the vets is having hallucinatory flashbacks. I think the things that mostly resemble PTSD would be GAD, depression and dissociative disorder. Dissociative disorder is when the vets emotions just sort of split off from his regular life, and he/she feels sort of dead inside and the world seems changed to a duller shade of gray. Emotional numbing to a great degree from shock. These are all part of PTSD to lessor or greater degree without the PTSD DX. Let's not forget panic disorder which is another anxiety disorder similar in many ways to PTSD. We can get around the VA's little games by skinning the cat a different way.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Of course maybe PTSD vets should start claiming more than one MH theory of entitlement to any MH issue, if they feel the VA might not DX them with PTSD......

Any thoughts?

Berta,

My VAMC & Vet Center, mental health peeps all diagnosed PTSD and provided a nexus, supported with full medical

rationale, to active duty.

I also had a claim issue in for depression that was denied - but I continued to appeal it.

I also continued to appeal my denial for SC of PTSD.

Finally, low and behold, a VAMC C&P examiner opined that regardless of PTSD, the co-morbid depression

was due to my SC'd medical conditions. This examiner was rare as he thoroughly reviewed my SMR's and

VAMC medical records.

He spoke with me regarding several things I myself had forgotten about - or I had at least, buried them in my mind.

Depression was granted with a real nice earlier effective date.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Depression was granted with a real nice earlier effective date."

That is a superb outcome Carlie...not that I wish any MH issue on anyone.....

"This examiner was rare as he thoroughly reviewed my SMR's and

VAMC medical records."

Wouldn't it be great if every vet had that kind of C & P examiner?

And you raised two theories of entitlement...both PTSD and the depression.....

I think sometimes vets lock themselves in with what they are claiming as an MH issue and for some vets, that will always cause a denial....

Maybe a vet who is new to the system and claiming PTSD , should bring info to the first MH C & P exam they get, that proves their stressor.......

The new regs do help OIF/OEF veterans for sure......

but as on the show, Dr. Valette still sees PTSD claims from Vietnam veterans (and he was so right as to how similar their PTSD is to the Iraq /Afganistan veterans.)

The news this AM on Baghdad made me think of Saigon, 1975..... how quickly we forget the horrific lessons of war

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use