Jump to content
  • 0

Agent Orange Double Whammy For Korean Dmz Vets!




Two BVA decision for Agent Orange results in a double whammy, or a stroke of luck or two lucky break decisions for Korean DMZ veterans.

Case #1: Involves an MP from 2nd MP Company, 2nd Infantry Division served 1965-1966 at the DMZ and is the first TO win a claim for Agent Orange exposure before the recognized DOD presumptive dates 1968-1971.

See the PDF for that BVA decision

Case #2: Involves a Combat Engineer from the 2nd Infantry Division used scientific evidence that prove dioxin degrades slowly in surface and subsurface soil. The veteran service 1976-1977, at the DMZ started five years after DOD’s presumptive date. This decision should encourage veterans WHO served on the DMZ after 1971 and have a current diagnosed presumptive disease to file a claim and keep fighting to win their entitled benefits.

See the PDF of VFW Magazine article October, 2014.

I hope this information will benefit others that were denied in the past to appeal or file new exposure claims.

Agent Orange Korea DMZ 1965-1966, 2nd MP Company, http_www.va.gov_vetapp14_Files2_1415571.pdf

VFW Magizine Article R on Reigstad DMZ Agent Orange Claim!.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Those are really good finds!

On a slightly related note,I went to the Korean DMZ as part of a private tour in either 1987 or 1988. I was a dependent and in country for a couple of years at that time. After living in Seoul, I can definitely state that the DMZ has to be the quietest and scariest part of Korea - period! During the tour, they took us down into these really long tunnels used by people to crossover. These tunnels were so large that a VW could probably drive through, but you would go for a good ways and then it was sealed with concrete. However, while down there, water was dripping on everyone's head, just like in any traditional cave network. Could it be that AO was seeping through and landing on us at the same time? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

AO in my opinion ,could have been anywhere.James Scripps proved it was in the US of A.

GREAT FIND!!!!!! THANKS A lot!!!!

In this case (I havent read the VFW pdf yet)

Lay evidence was cooborated with the veteran's personnel file, as well as photos he took in Korea at the DMZ..

The DMZ area was only a specific swath of land for VA AO purposes and his MOS put him near the perimeter as well.

"The Veteran testified that he was normally within 20 yards of the
spraying, and was routinely covered with wind-blown spray during the process. The
Veteran is competent to report all of this information, and there is no evidence in the
claims file that would indicate he is not credible."

This brings up a good point ..credibility... if a veteran makes one major error in first reporting a situation in service, and then his or her future description of the incident changes, the VA can often say the veteran is not credible.

VA does in essence what civil lawyers do in that type of situation and can tell juries to disregard future statements of a witness

and VA can deem the veteran as an "unreliable historian".

This veteran also submitted as evidence ,a vegetation control plan (wow where did he get that?) that supported his claim.It was not from the DOD as far as I can tell.

This claim also proves that Nothing is impossible but can take a lot of leg work. And leg work always pays off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I came come with Chronic Bronchitis that turned into Severe Asthma, with black spots on my lungs from OIF/OEF, due to the Crap Fires over there. At first the Navy and VA said it was due to my smoking, WTH!!! I have never smoked or drank in my life. Hopefully once this claim is complete, I will be granted SC for the Asthma. Funny thing is that I had all my C&Ps last week, but nothing mentioned about the Asthma, I wonder if the VA will just grant it, since they can see that I was treated in the Navy and use Inhaler now. Didn't mean to ramble on, just don't know why the Govt exposes their own Military to so many environmental hazards, and then denies it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

"Didn't mean to ramble on, just don't know why the Govt exposes their own Military to so many environmental hazards, and then denies it."

In my opinion, because it takes money and time to really study the long term affects of environmental hazards,which makes no sense after the fact, except to veterans who were exposed to those hazards, and disabled by them and often need costly independent medical opinions to prove those exposures gave them disabilties........

and then it would cost even more money to VA to compensate their disability from them.

The most important Veteran disability issue of my life has been the environmental weapon of mass destruiction aka Agent Orange . But I didn't have a dog in the fight until 45 years after my husband was exposed to AO in Vietnam and then only because of my last 2 AO death claims, finally resolved almost 20 years after he died.

is something wrong with that picture? You bet!

The initial AO regulations decades ago only had 2 disabilities they would compensate and the criteria for them was pretty hard to fulfill. The list of AO presumptions sure has grown in the last 2 decades but many AO vets have died, and even if their survivors were compensated by the VA,

what good did that do the vet in their lifetime.

The comp for any 100% AO vet in their lifetime is far greater than what VA pays as DIC to their dependents,after they die.

It is all about $$$$$

Edited by Berta
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • A few days ago, my attorney sent me this email on a PTSD claim I filed back in 2016 and have appealed to the BVA.  After getting this email, I checked eBenifits & VA.gov and they still read, "waiting to be sent to a law judge".

      "I am reaching out to give an update on your case. We are currently pending a Rating Decision in response to the Board Appeal filed 05/18/21. If you have received any recent VA correspondence, please be sure to inform our office"

      Thank You

      • 36 replies
    • Burn Pit Claim Assistance
      The NVLSP launched its Burn Claim Assistance program:  Details at the NVLSP website:

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
    • I have a C&P exam scheduled for next week for sleep apnea. I completed an at home sleep study sent by VES. However, I just visited ebenefits and noticed that my claim has been closed before my scheduled exam. Anyone ever experience this?
        • Confused
      • 11 replies
    • I already get compensation for bladder cancer for Camp Lejeune Water issue, now that it is added to Agent Orange does it mean that the VA should pay me the difference between Camp Lejeune and 1992 when I retired from the Marine Corps or do I have to re-apply for it for Agent Orange, or will the VA look at at current cases already receiving bladder cancer compensation. I’m considered 100% Disabled Permanently 
      • 20 replies
    • 5,10, 20 Rule
      The 5, 10, 20 year rules...

      Five Year Rule) If you have had the same rating for five or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless your condition has improved on a sustained basis. All the medical evidence, not just the reexamination report, must support the conclusion that your improvement is more than temporary.

      Ten Year Rule) The 10 year rule is after 10 years, the service connection is protected from being dropped.

      Twenty Year Rule) If your disability has been continuously rated at or above a certain rating level for 20 or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless it finds the rating was based on fraud. This is a very high standard and it's unlikely the rating would get reduced.

      If you are 100% for 20 years (Either 100% schedular or 100% TDIU - Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability or IU), you are automatically Permanent & Total (P&T). And, that after 20 years the total disability (100% or IU) is protected from reduction for the remainder of the person's life. "M-21-1-IX.ii.2.1.j. When a P&T Disability Exists"

      At 55, P&T (Permanent & Total) or a few other reasons the VBA will not initiate a review. Here is the graphic below for that. However if the Veteran files a new compensation claim or files for an increase, then it is YOU that initiated to possible review.

      NOTE: Until a percentage is in place for 10 years, the service connection can be removed. After that, the service connection is protected.


      Example for 2020 using the same disability rating

      1998 - Initially Service Connected @ 10%

      RESULT: Service Connection Protected in 2008

      RESULT: 10% Protected from reduction in 2018 (20 years)

      2020 - Service Connection Increased @ 30%

      RESULT: 30% is Protected from reduction in 2040 (20 years)
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 59 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Fund HadIt.com

    $10,656.00 of $1,500.00 Donate Now
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines