Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Someone Talk Me Out Of It!?

Rate this question


stillhere

Question

Hello well I am finally ready for the big shots in DC at the BVA. I have all my papers in order and planning on either going with a lawyer or not?

I am really having a hard time trying to decide! I have gotten this far basically with the help of this site and one other and also a pretty good state VSO. (he is now retired) Should I give up a 20% fee and go with a lawyer or just wing it myself knowing if I lose I can still appeal to court or try a reconsideration with a lawyer.

Little history Nam vet 69/70 central highlands with paper work showing couple of visit to medic for ear aches and problems with otitis Media. During exam to separate told by medic I flunked my hearing test (whisper test I think) and I had to stay an extra two weeks so they could test me further. I then signed a waiver so I could go home then, back to a exam 3 months earlier which showed 15's all the way across but the ent doctor hand wrote high frequency loss unilateral with otitis media.

I got out in 71 and never looked back even though I knew I was having trouble hearing I was hopping it would not get worse. Well it did, and I went to the VA for help in 1984 but they denied me and I did not appeal. Don't ask me why, just to disappointed and had a lot going on in my life. Ended getting a hearing aide myself and going on with my life. I was 36 I think.

Ran into a friend at AL and I was telling him what I did and he said I should try and get it reopened. I worked on that from 06 to 2013 when suddenly the VA called and had me in for a C&P well the dr. sided with me 100% and wrote a exam that blew away anything that the VA had. I was Very surprised to say the least and when I got my copy of the C&P I knew I would get service connected!

Sure enough the VA granted hearing loss and tinititis but they only retro me back to 2006 the date of my reopen claim. I NODed and still nothing, so now I am at the BVA and really don't want to screw this up.

But do I get a lawyer? What say you ladies and gents??

Stillhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

There's a lot to be said for continuity if you hire an attorney early in the appeals process. I think it's more difficult now to win appeals than it used to be, and it also appears that only a small fraction of denials are appealed at all, both at the BVA and CAVC levels.

That said, my experience has been that Board remands have mostly resulted in ping-pong games with the RO that have lasted even to this day, involved having to file a writ of mandamus petition, then denials, then CAVC appeals, then remands back to the Board. Then the situation repeats itself. In my husband's case, the denials occurred prior to the law change in 2007 which was not grandfathered, so we couldn't get attorney representation before it reached the CAVC on appeal. If you think it's worth going the pro se route to save yourself the attorney's fee, just be aware of what you're facing.

Personally, I prefer the sword and shield of a great attorney as soon as possible after a denial, but agreed, the attorney will want to either have the possibility of earning a decent fee from retro comp or, if at the CAVC, being awarded the EAJA payment, or both.

Edited by lotzaspotz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well Have as much as I can ready to go for my BVA appearance. Did not lawyer up so I am relying on my statements and others with the medical information I have to get me the EED I am asking for.

On reading here asknod and a few others I am VERY nervous about how this is going to pan out. Still have not heard a thing from my VSO and they have had my file since April 8th and I go in next week!

I just hope my PTSd doesn't get me to blow up at them and I am able to proceed on giving my presentation OK.

In my thinking I feel this is really cruel to have to put vets through this stuff when what we are asking is to be treated professionally and not have to counter all of their BS when it really is a matter of their incompetence in the 70/80"s when we were getting out. Most of their exams where useless from what I see and the only ones that got it right were the guys that complained!

Back to the squeaky wheel gets their benefits and those that don't tuff nukkies!

Oh well just ranting a little and feeling lots of butterflies in my gut! When will this be over??

Stillhere

Oh hope my heart holds out for this!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There's a lot to be said for continuity if you hire an attorney early in the appeals process. I think it's more difficult now to win appeals than it used to be, and it also appears that only a small fraction of denials are appealed at all, both at the BVA and CAVC levels.

That said, my experience has been that Board remands have mostly resulted in ping-pong games with the RO that have lasted even to this day, involved having to file a writ of mandamus petition, then denials, then CAVC appeals, then remands back to the Board. Then the situation repeats itself. In my husband's case, the denials occurred prior to the law change in 2007 which was not grandfathered, so we couldn't get attorney representation before it reached the CAVC on appeal. If you think it's worth going the pro se route to save yourself the attorney's fee, just be aware of what you're facing.

Personally, I prefer the sword and shield of a great attorney as soon as possible after a denial, but agreed, the attorney will want to either have the possibility of earning a decent fee from retro comp or, if at the CAVC, being awarded the EAJA payment, or both.

Curious at what point can you and can you not send a waiver of review. Would that not force the claim to keep going instead of sending it back to the denial monkeys?

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well Have as much as I can ready to go for my BVA appearance. Did not lawyer up so I am relying on my statements and others with the medical information I have to get me the EED I am asking for.

On reading here asknod and a few others I am VERY nervous about how this is going to pan out. Still have not heard a thing from my VSO and they have had my file since April 8th and I go in next week!

I just hope my PTSd doesn't get me to blow up at them and I am able to proceed on giving my presentation OK.

In my thinking I feel this is really cruel to have to put vets through this stuff when what we are asking is to be treated professionally and not have to counter all of their BS when it really is a matter of their incompetence in the 70/80"s when we were getting out. Most of their exams where useless from what I see and the only ones that got it right were the guys that complained!

Back to the squeaky wheel gets their benefits and those that don't tuff nukkies!

Oh well just ranting a little and feeling lots of butterflies in my gut! When will this be over??

Stillhere

Oh hope my heart holds out for this!!

Slow is smooth, smooth is fast. Review your cases, review your arguments, and your counter arguments. Memorize your time lines and the pertaining regulations. Stick with the facts, and you will succeed. I wish I could give you more sound advice than that, however, it is what I have. Never give up.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Good Luck stillhere, you'll do good bud!

..............Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

You have a lot at stake and 20% for a good lawyer is well worth it in my opinion.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use