Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

The Va Is Has Stoped Me From Getting An Imo

Rate this question


mos1833

Question

hi all

after all these years , i thought i had the va just where i wanted, wrong

in my first claim in 1985 i filed for a back condition.

they denied because they said it was a defect ( congenital transitional vertebra )

and by va law could not be service connected.

fast foward to nov.6th 2014 , after several reopenings and remands ,i get another denial for the same reasion.

( congenital transitional vertebra ) is not connectible.

well i went to get a ime , and he said it would be a waist of time and money, if its not premitted by law.

he reviewed my x-rays and said i had a minor congenital problem .

so what do you think , i thought that was settled in case long ago. thanks

Link to comment

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I was told by the military that I had a personality disorder. The VA told me once that I had a PD. I got multiple IME's to overcome this opinion. A PD is a congenital disorder but most of it is just opinion. The military and VA see congenital disorder because they do not want to pay for a disability. It is the battle of experts. You get more and better experts to take you side. This is not hard since the VA and military doctors are often idiots who can only make it in the military or VA system because they are willing to screw soldiers and vets to keep their jobs. They suffer a moral disability sort of like a PD because they lack a conscience and don't mind ruining a person's life to keep their jobs. Big organizations like the military, government and the VA are full of people like that who only think about promotions, pensions and personal benefits at the cost of their honor. There are others who have honor and usually suffer for it.

Link to comment
  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

When they take you in they give you a physical and accept you as is. If you have a condition that get worse they are on the hook. You can win if you get a Doc to opime that your condition is worse due to your service. That said good luck and I would not allow some VA hack to tell me I could not get a medical opinion.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
  • 0

The real question is what injury or accident while on active military duty you think caused/causes your current condition? Keep in mind that a veteran must have some type of residual disorder/disability to be compensated. Keep in mind you must have;

1. An inservice injury or disease. i hurt my back , more than once with a diagnosis of chronic pain,spasms, but they , the r.o. said it was not a chronic case, but was acute,and my back was normal at exit exam, they called it a sprian, they said my exit exam was normal back , i never had an exit exam/

i even ask them to show me those doucments , they never replayed. the records i have are clear to me.and they have the same as me, ( what a joke )

2. A current condition.i was approved for ssa for my back,also got approved for va pension for my back.

total and permant.

3. A nexus relating your inservice condition to your current condition with a good medical rationale .

i got the head of neurg , at the va hospital , who had treated me for two years give an opinion,it was good enough to reopen my claim, but they said it diden't carry any weight because he said my ddd ( may ) be connected to active duty injuries, but ssa used the same doctors letter to award benefits, and also it was used to get my pension from the va,( they didn't even talk about his rationale)

thanks all , this is a complex claim , ive'd been at it for decades.and still no smarter.

Link to comment
  • 0

1. An inservice injury or disease. i hurt my back , more than once with a diagnosis of chronic pain,spasms, but they , the r.o. said it was not a chronic case, but was acute,and my back was normal at exit exam, they called it a sprian, they said my exit exam was normal back , i never had an exit exam/

i even ask them to show me those doucments , they never replayed. the records i have are clear to me.and they have the same as me, ( what a joke )

2. A current condition.i was approved for ssa for my back,also got approved for va pension for my back.

total and permant.

3. A nexus relating your inservice condition to your current condition with a good medical rationale .

i got the head of neurg , at the va hospital , who had treated me for two years give an opinion,it was good enough to reopen my claim, but they said it diden't carry any weight because he said my ddd ( may ) be connected to active duty injuries, but ssa used the same doctors letter to award benefits, and also it was used to get my pension from the va,( they didn't even talk about his rationale)

thanks all , this is a complex claim , ive'd been at it for decades.and still no smarter.

Well it seems like you are well on your way but VA will need a doctor to state that your current condition is as least likely as not ( 50/50) caused by or related to the symptoms you had in military service. I went through the same thing and both my private doctor and my VA doctor ordered me a bone scan of my entire spine that proved that my back condition was not congenital. If a doctor state that you condition maybe or probably related to you military service VA will still deny your claim.

Edited by pete992
Link to comment
  • 0

thanks pete992,and all

the doctor that was willing to give the IME for my claim, but he read the decesion where the va said it could not granted because of va law.

i think he don't want to get involved in a legal issue, how do you fight something like that ????? thanks

Link to comment
  • 0

It isn't a legal issue, it is a medical one.

All the info above is very good.

if you can find a doctor who has the expertise and medical evidence to prove this is Not a congenital condition, you might have a better chance of SC.....

might.... even non congenital back injuries are often denied due to lack of any nexus in the SMRs, lack of any buddy statements as to the cause of the injury, and even denied for post service occupations which might have caused the injury...(whether that is just VA speculation or not)

Also often vets are denied because although there might be evidence in their SMRs, they claim the back disability many years after service and do not have current or continuous treatment records..

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use