Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

filing intent to file''

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think I may have screwed up, I never sent in my evidence that I use a cp machine and  my VA dx of Sleep Apnea in my original ptsd claim as SLEEP APNEA SECONDARY TO PTSD.

So crazy me I got into ebennys and click on new claim write  my name and file number  and it said I am filing a new claim  so I exited out and never put what I was intending to file for and this morning the VA says I have a new intent to file claim and have one year to file.

I thought they would add this to my original ptsd claim S.A. secondary to this claim  instead they say its a new claim? &have one year to submit it.

what should I do? call the 1-800 and ask them to withdraw that intent to file claim

because now there saying my claim could take up to 10-20-16 to 5 -10 of 2017:sad:

 

Any suggestions?

........Buck

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Buck I did something similar, called Peggy, told him of my mistake, and was told that it would make no difference in the processing of my current claim.  Apparently the intent to file evaporates from the site after a year (if no further action is taken).

Green

Green

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

oic,

well I never mention what I intent to file for. I never got that for into it, after it said I was filing for a new claim I exit out.

(I thought it would self delete?)

I was thinking I could just use this later? wait see what they do on my original ptsd claim   because the C&P Examiner did write a note about my dx and using a VA CPAP machine currently.

I thought I had to file secondary to ptsd  and that's what I thought I was going to to do until ebenny's said I was filing a new claim.

kicking myself   eh!

...Buck

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The "intent to file" (I have one too) just secures your one year date to file and submit all your information for the claim.  You are basically "preserving the date to file". Basically if you do NOTHING, it will disappear after a year.

Did you do now see a new claim?  Did you try to go in and delete the application?

Edited by Navy4life

US Navy Desert Storm Veteran
Proudly served my Country!!! :biggrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

yes I see a new intent to file claim along with my original intent to file claim  and  then my ptsd claim  so I now have three claims in my status.

 

Yes I understand how intent to file works I never click on intent to file  I just click on in ebennys to file S.A. secondary to my original ptsd claim.  there calling it a new claim?

its not suppose to mix in or mess up your original claim  but now their saying it may take up to 10 months or over a year to decide my ptsd claim?

I just had my C&P for this ptsd claim on the 23rd of Jan 2016

I am waiting on what they decided? the only thing is if I do get denied or low-balled I will have this ''New claim intent to file as S.A secondary to my ptsd   a better EED.

That is if I file within a year on this new intent to file claim they say I filed.

 

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

i

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I may need Ms berta or Asknod, jbasser, broncovet,USMC_VET  to help me get out of this mess  eh!

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use