Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bilateral plantar fascitis

Rate this question


sauerkraut1977

Question

Hi guys got a good one for you. I am awaiting my C&P for Bilateral plantar fasciitis any day now I hope. Estimated time till claim completion  is 4-1-16 to 06-15-16. I have this well documented in my military medical records while in the service and I am currently going to the VA hospital and getting treatment for this. Two weeks ago I had shots in both feet and I have another issue with my toe that required 3 shots in the joint today and going back to decided on surgery for a bone spur surgery and they are talking about fusing the toe. So since I have this mysterious toe issue that both of the podiatrists are scratching their heads about I don't know how I could add this to my pending claim. I do know I want to stall on the surgeries until after I get a rating I hope, So from what I have seen with this issue and ratings I could be rated at either at 0%, 10%,30% or 50% for this anybody have any experience with  this issue and gone through a C&P and have any advice??? Thanks for any help!!!

Edited by sauerkraut1977
turn on notification
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Have you had surgery on your feet for the PF?  If I know the VA I think they will grant 10% per foot unless you have had surgery and walk with braces.  I have neuropathy in both feet and I only got 10% per foot.  I have PF as well and my feet are just no good anymore.  To get over 10% I think you will have had to have a failed surgery and be at least partially unable to walk without braces.   I swear if you have really bad PF it is almost better to have your feet cut off and have bionic feet.  You would be able to walk a lot better.  That sounds crazy but anyone who has had severe and chronic foot pain might feel that way.  Do you have very flat feet or  very high arches.  The VA will say part of your problem is genetic/constitutional like telling me I have Charcot joint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I do have some low arch but not much so i have not even bothered with a clqim for that. I have an issue with my toe that they are trying to figure out. This is what the records say: Impression:
 Joint effusion within the great toe interphalangeal joint. Marrow edema of the great toe distal phalanx and proximal phalanx. Primary diagnostic consideration is septic arthritis
 with osteomyelitis. The extensive marrow edema, lack of l erosions, and lack of metatarsophalangeal joint involvement make gout less likely.

The examer said its an infection. The poditrist is putti g me on 2 antoibiotics for 30 days to see if swelling goes down. Worse case the will cut off my big toe he said so hope not. As far as pf i have been getting injections in the heel and have insole order by VA. Hoping andyman73 is right and i get atleast 30 since it is bilateral. What really surprise me was the the VA examener said he also added me SC for the bone spurs also which is seperate so i hear and an amazing thing to happen according to some guys on here to actually have something not claimed added.So waiting for the exam notes here on myvethealth and will keep and eye on ebenefits for the what rating i get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use