Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Successful Secondary Sleep Apnea Claims Results

Rate this question


Gastone

Question

Secondary SA SC Awards are acknowledged by most, to be very difficult to obtain. Can't say I recall seeing an abundance of Secondary SA Awards discussed here.

I got mine SC'd Secondary to CAD. 2011. Toddt just got his SC'd with a recent DRO Hearing. (I think it was a Hearing)

Anybody else out there, been successful, or have a SA Secondary claim pending?

Happy Easter

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I think secondary awards are easier to win than primary.  Here is why:

1.  Primary (direct) SC requires all 3 legs of Caluza Triangle:  current diagnosis, in service event or aggravation and nexus.  

2.  However, secondary sc requires ONLY 2 (diagnosis and nexus link to sc condition).  You dont need an in service event or aggravation, as that has already been established with your primary SC issue.  This can be a big deal in sleep apnea, especially since sleep apnea wasnt even invented back in the 1970's so its pretty hard to prove you had a disease in the 1970's that wasnt even invented until the 1980's.  Alex found this with Hep C.  The VA denied SC for hep c as there was no in service diagnosis of hep c.  Well the test for hep c didnt happen until after many vietnam vets got out of service.  This does not mean they did not have hep c, it means that our docs did not have the technology to diagnose it back then.  The hep c bug was still crawling around their liver, it just was not given a name yet.  Ditto for sleep apnea.

Its all about the old saying:  absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence.  Allow me to explain.  "Evidence of absence" is good evidence.  It means a doctor did an exam, such as an x ray, and proclaimed, "this veteran's x ray is absent any evidence of a fracture".  

Contrast this to a board judge looking in the Veterans file and declaring, "there is no evidence of a fracture" in a c file (absence of evidence).  Wait! 

What if all the records were not there!  What if there never was an x ray, but a doc put a cast on the leg anyway, as he could "feel" the fracture!  

The former is good evidence.  The test showed no fracture.  However, the latter, doesnt mean much except for the military or VA does not have good records.  They are not the same thing..and not even close.   

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I don't have a success story for this, nor do I have one pending either.  I do have a denial for SA secondary, however. Trying to figure out how to get this done, since my depression secondary to chronic pain was denied, mostly because the shrink examiner willfully chose to ignore a huge pile of SMR/STR entries for pain, and subsequent VA treatment and prescription records as well. 

That examiner did state that I suffer from chronic sleep issues, tho.  But that does me as much good as not having filed at all. 

Not gonna hijack someone's thread, so....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Andyman, you do have a SA DX'd post SC's for Pain & Depression Awards, right? Are you on Cpap or Bipap?

How about a time-line of your SC's and Claims/Denials? Is your SA Denial still alive, on appeal?

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gastone,

No SC for SA or MDD.  SA DX'd by private dr. MDD DX'd by VA MH dr., but not SC'd because examiner ignored tons of evidence.  Am SC'd for bilateral patella femoral pain syndrome, low back strain/pain, and residuals of ankle injury L ankle.  These are SC'd to my EAS, 11/98.

Still trying to write up NOD's for SA and depression secondary to chronic pain.  Should have them done by week's end.  Have a few months on the depression and more on the SA time line to get them in.  Very hard to over come the over whelming urge to go belly up and let it all go. 

Dealing with the illiac crest pain issue, which no body wants to make an official DX or opine what may be causing it.  April 4th I go to pain management for shots for pain for which isn't DX'd. 

This Thursday I go for neuro exam, that had been scheduled for last Thursday, but got bumped a week.

Add to that a VSO that keeps siding with "them", and can't seem to be bothered to help me.  And being turned away by 2 notable law firms...

Riptide is pulling me out, all I can do is swim parallel to the shore, just hoping to break free before I get pulled beyond the point of no return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

BUT. the SA is DX'd and your on Cpap, right?

I've had fairly good results, as to Pain Therapy, with the New VA Acupuncture available at the Det VMC. Check with your VMC, the VA got a Large grant last year, to set up alternative Pain walk-in clinics, it might help.

I try to get in every 2 weeks for a treatment, been doing this since 10/15. Accually seems to work better than Pregabalin (Lyrica) and no side effects.

Semper Fi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use