Veteran is TDIU, 100% P & T and is in VOCREHAB. Applies for jobs but keeps getting terminated. Obtains one where he is making a substantial amount of money. 11 months into it he is terminated for too many doctor visits, and allegedly not getting along with coworkers, etc. Litigation ensures with the former company over the termination. All along he has reported his positions to the VA VOCREHAB. Received paperwork from VOC indicating receipt. Fast forward a few years later, and two special agents show up and state, repeatedly, "you can work", you can work" and you made $175,000.00 in one year and never reported it to us". This was the most amount of money the veteran had made, ever. The paperwork to VOCREHAB shows that it was reported.
The veteran and his wife have a very small business and the wife primarily handles everything in it. About 10% of the work is performed by the veteran. Veteran travels out of state once a month on the family business. (Farm) Veteran takes about 400.00 per month from the business. special agents are using this to indicate the veteran can work.
Veteran has extensive medical issues and attends doctors appointments at least two times a week. Most if not all employers will not tolerate this level of absence from an employee.
VA special agents also allege that a letter to the VA from the veterans wife is forged. Wife is unsure if it is her signature or not but states every aspect of the letter is accurate nonetheless. She states that the veteran has had her permission to sign her name on documents previously.
So here are the questions from the bizarre set of circumstances:
is TDIU null and void based on the amount of money you make, if there is a clear pattern of rocky employment, even if in one circumstance the income is significant?
Is TDIU void if there is any indication of employment and/or is it an objective standard taking into account the total circumstances of the person?
Is minimally working in a family farm detrimental to TDIU?
PS: The complaint to the VA was submitted by the former employer to retaliate against him for filing a civil lawsuit.
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
Question
USACID
Imagine the following scenario:
Veteran is TDIU, 100% P & T and is in VOCREHAB. Applies for jobs but keeps getting terminated. Obtains one where he is making a substantial amount of money. 11 months into it he is terminated for too many doctor visits, and allegedly not getting along with coworkers, etc. Litigation ensures with the former company over the termination. All along he has reported his positions to the VA VOCREHAB. Received paperwork from VOC indicating receipt. Fast forward a few years later, and two special agents show up and state, repeatedly, "you can work", you can work" and you made $175,000.00 in one year and never reported it to us". This was the most amount of money the veteran had made, ever. The paperwork to VOCREHAB shows that it was reported.
The veteran and his wife have a very small business and the wife primarily handles everything in it. About 10% of the work is performed by the veteran. Veteran travels out of state once a month on the family business. (Farm) Veteran takes about 400.00 per month from the business. special agents are using this to indicate the veteran can work.
Veteran has extensive medical issues and attends doctors appointments at least two times a week. Most if not all employers will not tolerate this level of absence from an employee.
VA special agents also allege that a letter to the VA from the veterans wife is forged. Wife is unsure if it is her signature or not but states every aspect of the letter is accurate nonetheless. She states that the veteran has had her permission to sign her name on documents previously.
So here are the questions from the bizarre set of circumstances:
is TDIU null and void based on the amount of money you make, if there is a clear pattern of rocky employment, even if in one circumstance the income is significant?
Is TDIU void if there is any indication of employment and/or is it an objective standard taking into account the total circumstances of the person?
Is minimally working in a family farm detrimental to TDIU?
PS: The complaint to the VA was submitted by the former employer to retaliate against him for filing a civil lawsuit.
thanks in advance for your assistance.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
Popular Days
Apr 6
2
Apr 7
1
Top Posters For This Question
USACID 1 post
Gastone 1 post
Buck52 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 6 2016
2 posts
Apr 7 2016
1 post
Popular Posts
Gastone
Is there presumed Mail Fraud? That signature on his wife's letter could pose a problem. He didn't work 12 consecutive "Uninterrupted" months of SGI+ (BIG PLUS$$) employment. However, he did fail
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now