Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Back Log

Rate this question


JohnM

Question

Just talked to our Rep this morning and the reason for a back long is because of the Vet's that are coming home from this miserable forsaken war are being put on top of the pile, and she said its causing a big back log everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Reading all of the replies, I said to John maybe we should write to our congress. His reply is no this is being done for political reasons, because their having trouble with recuritments regardless of what they say and the media is focusing on the returning Vets. Which is about time! The administration is trying to improve their image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure feel these Iraq vets should get special care on their claims-

But what I mean is -there is surely in most cases -obvious evidence of service injury in most cases-and their SMRs should be easy for VA to get.I bet these decisions do not really take a lot of time that say a vet with a claim due to service 30-40 years ago might need a lot more time to succeed.

I actually thought I read somewhere that these claims were being handled separately from what the VAROs already have in the stack.

I am surprised to see here that the VAROs are handling them.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jangrin

Ricky,

You said,

I love them, respect them and support their mission, however, I do not feel that any veteran should receive special treatment above the rest.

By placing these claims in front of the ones already pending the VA is being allowed to paint a false picture for the American public. Immediate and quick processing of the claims for the new veterans will allow them to stand up and say "see, we ain't so bad. We are currently turning claims around for IF vets in 4-6 months. We told you all of those old guys were just a bunch of complainers wanting a handout" at which point the politicians will pat them on the back and say "good job boys" as they are posting on their political web sites "see what I have done for the veteran community". I am NOT, REPEAT NOT, trying to downgrade any vets importance, I am simply providing my opinion.

Ricky, there are things about this board that are very good. One of them is we all can have an opinion and then when can state that opinion. I must say you made an excellant point. We had not thought about that. We were looking at the immediate need. Most medical needs will be met by the VA medical centers. The fiancial needs will be met through the VA claims system.

After reading your post, we agree with your assesment of this situation and the way the VA claims process is perceived. Our position would present a false picture of how our veterans are being treated. The nice thing about this forum board is, you can listen or read other another persons post and weigh the information, and change your mind if you want.

We have changed oour stance on this and we agree with you and your opinion. As long as the immediate medical needs are met, the financial needs should be the same for all vets, young or old, rich or poor, first come first served. Thank you for your insightful post.

Jangrin and Chuckles

Edited by jangrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The new Vets coming into the system are a perfect way for VARO's to cook their books, and get the numbers needed. These claims in most cases will be very easy for the RO, as the evidence will be so current even they would have a hard time screwing it up.

I can see the RO's and the VSO's dribbling all over themselves because the claims that will be awarded will be high due to the injuries these Vets are coming back with , and the turnaround rate will be swift, but it does not excuse the VA to put these claims ahead of the pack.

All Vets are deserving of quick adjudication of claims , not just a select group, but like what was said , the media is starting to look at the VA so they will window dress this any way they can.

So to all Vets who have an active claim not from Iraq, you must sit in the back of the bus until the VA reaches it destination.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

RVN vets are still dying from AO poisoning and now they have to wait longer???? The claim dies with the vet and the VA high fives every time a RVN vet dies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not believe that the current vets coming from Iraq should go to the head of the line for claims processing. If the RO's wanted to they could assign maybe a couple of raters to only rate the Iraq vets. That would leave the other raters to handle all of the other veterans claims that are currently pending. As JR Reihs says and I agree putting the Iraq vets ahead of all the others will make the numbers for Va look good and get the monkey off their back until all the Iraq claims are handled then the numbers will not look so good anymore. Dale Jr. 8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use