Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Does this sound like a correct explanation of VBA hearing?

Rate this question


kanewnut

Question

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It appears that you requested or agreed to a Last Minute  RO Review Hearing of your NOD'd issue/issues, to be held prior to your Appeal being Certified to the BVA for Docketing.

As long as the final result is the Award, both SC% and EED your seeking, proceeding to the BVA would be pointless. However, I certainly wouldn't waive the BVA Hearing until you have a signed copy of the Award in your hand.

Did your VSO-Rep accompany you to the Hearing? What do they have to say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I agree with Gaststone  that looks like either a transcript of the hearing review or DRO Hearing. with you...with ''chairman''??

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I found a past post you made indicating this is for TDIU? not sure

Do you get SSDI and if so is that solely for your service connected 80% disabilities?

Is VA aware of the SSDI award?

Were you ever turned down for VOC Rehab, solely due to the same disabilities?

Have you ever attached here any denial you got for TDIU that has triggered the DRO hearing?

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

More precise info always makes it easier to get a grip on your situation. How about posting a redacted copy of the Original Denial and the Notification Letter associated with this recent Hearing?

What was the date of your NOD Filing and what Appeal Route did you choose, RO Review, DRO Review, DRO Hearing or the Traditional BVA Hearing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm sorry, when I looked through and read my transcript I thought it was pretty clear and straight forward. But apparently not. The Chairman in the transcript is the VA RO. Mr. Simms is the NCDVA - North Carolina Division of Veteran Affairs. They were my VSO at the time.

My point in posting this was to show that here is the NCDVA( my VSO ) telling me that a BVA hearing is the same thing as this hearing in front of a VA RO. And the VA RO does nothing to correct the NCDVA. 

20 hours ago, Gastone said:

However, I certainly wouldn't waive the BVA Hearing until you have a signed copy of the Award in your hand.

Well. I know that now but unfortunately this is from  back in 2000. I have been going through my C-File and reading and realized what they did to me back then.

 

8 hours ago, Berta said:

Do you get SSDI and if so is that solely for your service connected 80% disabilities

Yes. Since 2005.

 

8 hours ago, Berta said:

Is VA aware of the SSDI award?

Yes, they are.

8 hours ago, Berta said:

Were you ever turned down for VOC Rehab, solely due to the same disabilities?

I have never checked into VOC Rehab.

8 hours ago, Berta said:

Have you ever attached here any denial you got for TDIU that has triggered the DRO hearing?

Not as of yet.

testing my signature

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

How about posting a redacted copy of the RO Decision from back in 2000.

Your VSO was a NC State Vet Rep, Ah Ha, ever think about switching your POA to One of the Reg National VSO's with an HQ at your RO such as VFW, DAV, Marine Corps League?

Have you filed any New Claims for SC or Increase?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use