Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

SMC-K claim

Rate this question


MartyL16

Question

I am a 100% TDIU Disabled Veteran. I have 20 years of USAF active duty including Vietnam and Thailand. I am SC for DIABETES, Pulmonary Sarcoidosis, and other that are presumptive for AO exposure.

About 12 years ago, I experienced impotence as a regular disability but didn't know the VA actually knew that my SC Diabetes and meds caused it.

About 3-4 years ago my VA Internist started me on different meds, to attempt to correct that by 'test driving' these meds for months at a time with no success.

Then my PCP scheduled me for a UROLOGIST appointment that went thru CHOICE but that Doctor said "too many meds and primarily the DIABETES and ENLARGED PROSTATE " caused this problem. That was about 6 months ago.

I want to file for SMC-K as my VA doctors and my civilian doctors have the records confirming that SC disease, meds and AO have caused my LOSS of my "creative organ" function.

Some 'soothsayers' have said if I file ANY claim, I become a VARO 'target of opportunity' and the RO could try to downgrade my TDIU P&T, 100%. I am 70% SC.

Medically, over the years, the VA could NEVER find records that would indicate that ANY SC disease, or secondary diseases IMPROVED, that is a fact. Unfortunately, they lie a lot.

The question is: what is your advice? File, or NOT file? and why please.

Marty

USAF 20yrs

MSgt. Retired 1987

SC 70%

TDIU 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Is it worth having a C&P where they could re-evaluate you for 104.00 a month in SMC-K?

 

CAS

 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

File.   Or, give in to VA's "scare tactics" where VA employees and VSO's try to scare you out of applying for all the benefits you deserve, by putting fear into you they will reduce you instead.  

You know your health history better than I do.  Once you are P and T or over 5 years, they cant reduce you unless you "actually improve" under ordinary conditions of life.  If you plan on going back to work soon, then yes, they can reduce you.  

Its up to you..I know Im not caving into VA's scare tactics as I know the regulations too well.  Here they are for your information:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 I agree with broncovet  why not file? If we were in doubt to file a claim because  the VA would open up our ratings disability's  and try to reduce our already  S.C. Ratings  we would never get anywhere with the VA or get our well deserved benefits and the VA WOULD WIN OUT.

If you have a legitimate claim  a Diagnose for E.D. AND PUT TOGETHER  A  E.D. claim .

File it has a secondary claim to the meds you take for? get a Qualified  Dr to state so.  that the meds is  '' is likely as not related or caused the E.D.''  Qualified Dr needs to give his pro opinion.

I'd file for it.  its not going to be given a % but you can Get it service connected   secondary to the meds you take for? BOUT 104.00 PER MONTH ADDED TO YOUR ALREADY COMPENSATION.

BTW,

I NEVER HAD A C&P FOR MY  E.D. and receiving the SMC K & S  H.B.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You're in your late 60's to mid 70's, so any chance of significant improvement of your Physical (Not Mental) Disabilities being shown in your VMC Med File are slim and none.  Have any of your SC Disabilities Improved? The SMC K is worth approx $1248.00 per year, get it or leave it, your Decision.

What specifically are you referring to, "Unfortunately they Lie a lot?" Who, what, when and where?

Could you post a redacted copy of your IU Award?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 5/26/2018 at 6:03 AM, Gastone said:

You're in your late 60's to mid 70's, so any chance of significant improvement of your Physical (Not Mental) Disabilities being shown in your VMC Med File are slim and none.  Have any of your SC Disabilities Improved? The SMC K is worth approx $1248.00 per year, get it or leave it, your Decision.

What specifically are you referring to, "Unfortunately they Lie a lot?" Who, what, when and where?

Could you post a redacted copy of your IU Award?

GASTONE, thank you for your comments.

The VA doctors, the CHOICE Urologist, my civilian Internist and the Pharmacy records with reports all conclude as I have stated.

I have been 100% TDIU P&T awarded May 31st 2013. That means I hit that 5 year mark in afew days. 

Yes, I will now file my claim for that. Thank you.

I am 70 and NONE of any of my disabilities, both SC and other have gotten medically better and documented so, with MRI, CT scans, X-Rays, lab work and 30 years of medical records they have in their possession.

My comment “Unfortunately they Lie a lot?" Is because for all the years they denied my TDIU claim and others, it was the local RO that would state in the ratings (3 ratings) “records indicate you are capable of working” but when I got my DRO video conference I resubmitted everything I had been submitting since 2006-2009 and TDIU was awarded. The RO statement “records indicate” was never explained, even when asked in a NOD. BTW, the DRO was from a different state.

The Phoenix RO repeatedly denied claims for a lot of things by stating “no records found” or in all cases from 2009-2014, when asked, the Examiners would tell me they were NOT able to review my C-File and reported only things I told them during the exam. 

I retired in ‘87 and went from 0 to 15% for arthritis up until 2009. The Albuquerque RO was the AOJ and took me to 40% because of SC Diabetes and everything that was claimed in Phoenix, died in their hands, until the DRO conference in June of 2013.

Even a secondary claim for recurring pneumonia (I have had pneumonia 10 times since AD) from my SC 0% was denied by Phoenix even though my civilian doctor gave a DBQ staing that was caused by the SC disease, and the Examiner plainly stated “more likely than not (greater than 51%), the ONLY words the Phoenix put was DENIAL because ‘NO DIAGNOSIS’.

So much for the Phoenix RO NOT lying!

Can I tell you more and give you ‘cut and paste’ bull from ratings that the VARO would deny all.......sure.  How much time do you have?

Marty

USAF 20yrs

MSgt. Retired 1987

SC 70%

TDIU 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 5/26/2018 at 3:02 AM, Buck52 said:

 I agree with broncovet  why not file? If we were in doubt to file a claim because  the VA would open up our ratings disability's  and try to reduce our already  S.C. Ratings  we would never get anywhere with the VA or get our well deserved benefits and the VA WOULD WIN OUT.

If you have a legitimate claim  a Diagnose for E.D. AND PUT TOGETHER  A  E.D. claim .

File it has a secondary claim to the meds you take for? get a Qualified  Dr to state so.  that the meds is  '' is likely as not related or caused the E.D.''  Qualified Dr needs to give his pro opinion.

I'd file for it.  its not going to be given a % but you can Get it service connected   secondary to the meds you take for? BOUT 104.00 PER MONTH ADDED TO YOUR ALREADY COMPENSATION.

BTW,

I NEVER HAD A C&P FOR MY  E.D. and receiving the SMC K & S  H.B.

Thanks BUCK52. Appreciate your comments..

all I want is what I deserve. 

Marty

USAF 20yrs

MSgt. Retired 1987

SC 70%

TDIU 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use