Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vcaa Question Ref. Private Medical Records

Rate this question


vaf

Question

I've got a question about the extent to which the VA is required to help the veteran obtain information from private sources.

The veteran has obtained an independent medical opinion from a physician to support a claim. The physician has treated the veteran for several years, and states so in the IMO. Then, the VA had a specific question on that IMO, but never notified the veteran or the physician, who in writing invited inquiries should anything else be needed. Then, the VA (in this case the Board) denied the claim, specifically referring to the IMO, but stating an apparently minor point of confusion (whether the muscle spasms referenced occurred in the cervical spine, the lumbar spine, or the extremities), which could have easily been cleared up if the veteran or the physician had been notified. In fact, the veteran first heard of it when he received the Board decision.

This all occurred after the implementation of VCAA in 2000. No VCAA notice, and apparently, this conflicts with 38 CFR, Part 3, § 3.159, as well as M21-1 in the discussion referencing developing evidence from non-Federally held agencies (i.e., private medical records). The veteran completed numerous release of information authorization forms, which the VA claims to have never received.

In contrast, the VA is citing 38 C.F.R. 4.2, which says that if VA has a medical examination it regards as inadequate for decisional purposes or in which the diagnosis doesn’t match the data, VA is to return the examination as inadequate, seek another exam or clarification of the initial exam from the VA provider, i.e. this has been interpreted to refer only to VA exams, where VA can compel a re-examination.

Am I wrong in believing that the VA violated the VCAA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA talks about helping but they do very little. When I had my claim I had to track down and get copies of private medical records that the VA wanted. There idea of helping is sending out a request that you have signed giving the VA permission to get copies of your records.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

I was told that I did not request my medical records, from the VAMC Long Beach, Ca., with an FOIA. I sent copies of my FOIA request for these records from 2002. I told VSM that they could read the Different FOIA, request for records from L.B. Ca., for each year that they failed to produce. The VA has been using this BVA remand request, for this FOIA information that the VA needed to obtain from itself, as a reason to put a hold on my claims.

Finally, the Little Rock, Ar., VARO was mailed, these records from the L.B. FOIA medical records 1/14/2007.

Now, the VARO says that some of my claims are going to be held up because I have Diabetes. I didn't even tell them, and I was hoping that they would not find out, as far as my BVA remands are concerned, but there are some factual people within the VA.

Re-examination, right.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that the VA deliberately did not advise the veteran or his doctor that they lacked this one point of information, and they're using it to deny the entire claim. They have an IMO from this doctor, yet act like they didn't know where to get the medical records to back up that IMO.

How do the two separate subsections I cited from 38 CFR impact each other? The VA is using one to excuse itself from helping the veteran further develop his claim (because the records were not from the VAMC), and the veteran is using the other to prove that the VA didn't fulfill its duty to assist, and at least notify the veteran that additional information was needed before denying it.

Edited by Vicki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Part and parcel of my remand was for the AMC to get my SSA records.

Alex advised me to be pro-active and get them and anything else and send them to the AMC.

I've sent them Registered U.S. Mail. Waited. Called them. "....we are still waiting for your SSA records"

I've FAXed them. Waited. Called them. "....we are still waiting for your SSA records"

I've sent them Registered U.S. Mail. Waited. Called them. "...we are still waiting for your SSA records"

I've FAXed them. Waited. Called them. "....we are still" YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, I KNOW "YOU ARE STILL WAITING FOR MY SSA RECORDS!"

This is the damnedest thing. Heck, I can get my SSA records and yet one arm of the Federal Gubberming can not only NOT get records from another branch of gubbermint.......but, they can't even seem to find their butt with both hands with a spotlight shinin on it.

You don't really suppose that they are simply holding up my claim............do ya?

Well, I have some news for 'em..........I ain't planning on dyin anytime soon.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
My point is that the VA deliberately did not advise the veteran or his doctor that they lacked this one point of information, and they're using it to deny the entire claim. They have an IMO from this doctor, yet act like they didn't know where to get the medical records to back up that IMO.

How do the two separate subsections I cited from 38 CFR impact each other? The VA is using one to excuse itself from helping the veteran further develop his claim (because the records were not from the VAMC), and the veteran is using the other to prove that the VA didn't fulfill its duty to assist, and at least notify the veteran that additional information was needed before denying it.

Vicky,

This is a matter of logic. I wish that I could figure the logic out for you, but when it comes to dealing with the Veterans, logic seems to disappear.

I know exactly what you are saying, but how in the world does someone ever accomplish getting the VA. to understand anything.

They don't seem to or want to know when black is black and white is white.

Josephine

Josephine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Larry

Can you go see the the local VA Regional Office and talk to a counselor and then hand them your entire package of SSA records? They probably have all your records from SSA sitting in your C-File but are too dumb and lazy to look for them. I always went to my RO with all my records and talked to someone and got them to acknowledge I was giving them these records and got copies. They held my claims us for the same kinds of reasons and I went and got the info and brought it to them and handed it to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 3 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use