Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

mycosis fungoides

Rate this question


Buck52

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Anyone know if  mycosis fungoides is on the A.O. LIST in some other type name?  its a itchy skin deseas  I have on my loew back *three liason patches circles....the VA don't know what it is after 2 biopsy ...the VA Dr the other day mention chronic mycosis fungoides   I am not sure they know what it is?

..I been exposed to A.O (Vietnam). but also exposed to the weed killer Round-up i USED on our yard and garden when we live out in the county about 10 years ago

I';ve been dealing with this with the VA the last 4 or 5 years,

Anyone know if it can be connected to  the A.O. AS A PRESUMPTION CLAIM?

OR Should Take this to the private sector and file on the Round-up Compesation?

I maybe able to get the VA dR TO GIVE ME A DIAGNOSE and see what he says?

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I'll tell you where this came from. I talked to a friend who has copd. He said he gets (or got) very small comp checks from a couple of these asbestos litigation funds. I think he still does but it isn't as much as what the VA pays, even for 10%. But what happens is when he tried to get a VA disability, they denied and said that since he was getting payment from the fund, it was evidence that he didn't get the breathing problems in the Navy, but after his service. In otherwords, the VA denied s-c for him. So, I'm just saying you got to really check this out and make sure you're not going to short change yourself. The obvious thing is you need to find out what the anticipated payout would be from Round-Up and compare to a likely diagnostic code. Also, would your additional VA s-c coverage likely help with survivor benefits if that is a consideration for you.As for whether or not VA decisions make any sense, well, it's there ball and their rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

From just one of the many BVA decisions:    



Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with active disease or during a treatment phase is rated 100 percent. The 100 percent rating shall continue beyond the cessation of any surgical, radiation, antineoplastic chemotherapy or other therapeutic procedures. Six months after discontinuance of such treatment, the appropriate disability rating shall be determined by VA examination. If there has been no local recurrence or metastasis, then a rating shall be based on residuals. 38 C.F.R. § 4.118, Diagnostic Code 7715."

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/mycosis-fungoides

 

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is on the AO presumptive list....

 

 

Edited by toddt
add sentence
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 

Here is in part what the Dr said in her notes  on date 8-01-2019 on my last visit at the VA. I had a biopsy done in 5-23 2017 and one in 2018

Also what is ''lower back with skin colored patch with cigarette paper appearance'' mean??? IF ANYONE CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS DOC SAID HERE LET ME KNOW?

Antecedent history: Presented with annular rash on lower back. Biopsied on 5/23/17 with results returning as follows: SKIN, LOWER BACK (PUNCH BX): - This case was sent for consultation to Cockerell Dermatopathology. - An addendum report will follow. ADDENDUM (6/2/17): COCKERELL DERMATOPATHOLOGY REPORT (6/1/17) SKIN, LOWER BACK (PUNCH BX): - PATCHY INFILTRATE WITH SLIGHT EPIDERMOTROPISM. NOTE: While not unequivocally diagnostic this pattern may be seen in some forms of early patch stage mycosis fungoides and if that is possible clinically, it would be advisable to perform additional biopses. These are not the features of dermatophytosis or Hansen's disease in these sections. ROS: Denies F/C. No other skin complaints. Personal History NMSC/Malignant Melanoma/Other Skin disease: denies FamHx NMSC/Malignant Melanoma/Other Skin Disease: denies Allergies: PENICILLIN Medications reviewed Exam: WA, WD, alert, in NAD A body skin examination including the face, neck, shoulders, chest, back, abdomen, buttocks, upper and lower extremities was notable for: - Mid lower back with skin colored patch with cigarette paper appearance, no erythema or scale -

 

 Scalp with small areas of greasy scale. Non-odorous -

Eczematous dermatitis with pruriuts - Likely early patch stage MF (favored based on chronicity and biopsy), Stage 1a. No progression today and no systemic symptoms - Continue TAC 0.1% ointment BID - Continue Eucerin moisturizer for xerosis. Refilled. - Patient to call clinic for sooner appointment if rash fails to improve - Discussed the possibility of a diagnosis of MF and that overall at this stage it does not change our management. He denies systemic sx and knows to call the clinic if the rash worsens or he develops fever, chills, night sweats, weight loss 2) Seborrheic dermatitis - Will re-examine at next visit  10/31/2019

Duypentrens Contracture left hand Extending from palm to left fourth MCP joint is a cord like fibrotic plaque A/P 1) will get x-rays today.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Obviously, there is a need for an exam by an independent dermatologist, whether it is non-hopkins or not. This is just a guess on my part, but I know I am not a doctor, and I seriously doubt that anyone here is a doc either. So, IMO I would get the exam and go from there on what action to take. I certainly wouldn't count on the VA to do a good job based on how they have determined so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Roger that GB Army

My thinking too..now to save up for that private exam  eh!

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use