Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

?!?!?Obligation Dates?!?!?

Rate this question


blahsaysme2u

Question

another thing that has come up that i cant find any info. i have never heard of Obligation date before. i have searched google too and nothing. anyone know what this means? what are these dates? i have already entered my service dates and this is the next tab. 

thanks for any info

 

 

image.thumb.png.280175e817d9e7453370768b704c023d.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Seems it is your commitment date, or dates for your contract, start and ending. If you need to know, contact a state N.G. recruiter and confirm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Unless you are in the Reserves or National Guard, this does not apply to you.  

For Reserves or National Guard, there is a minimum period of service to be eligbile for benefits which is different from Active Duty Veterans.  

In a nutshell, Reserves or National Guard "training" does not count toward military service for the purpose of benefits.  

If you want to know more about the reserve eligibility, read this:

https://www.benefits.va.gov/BENEFITS/benefits-summary/SummaryofVANationalGuardandReserve.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

This is weird the VA has this showing in his ebenefits  or a letter they sent?

I know after I got out I was reserved for an additional 3 years before they sent my Honorable Discharge Certificate.

I think all veterans have this status.  that went in served their time and  then ETS  they are placed in the Military Reserves according to the Branch they served = US Army ,USMC, US NAVY, US AIR FORCE  for an additional 3 years before receiving his/her Honorable Discharge Certificate.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Buck, if I recall correctly, we had 2 choices in the early 1970's:

1.  We could serve 4 years OR

2.  We could serve 2 years AND 4 more years in reserve or National Guard.  

   So, I did not serve in the reserve or national guard.  Now, they sent me letters to recruit me for years, but I knew that Reserve was not mandantory for me.  It was only mandantory if you served "only" 2 years.   I served 4 years and was done.  

   I seem to recall the military called it, "EAOS".  That is, the date of the "End of your Active Obligated Service".  

   As I may have mentioned, in the 70's, military service was "an obligation".  

Younger people where the military is all volunteer may not get that.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Bronc my situation was similar. Drafted in 1969 and released from Vietnam 2 years later. The regulation at that time was you could go to inactive reserves if you served in 'Nam, which I did. No additional requirement.So,for 4 years no meetings, no notices, nothing. (thank you Uncle Sam!), Got my discharge 4 years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Well when we enlisted   were committed to a 6 year obligation, 3 years active 3 years reserve.

 I served 3 years  with an early out from President Nixon Implemented  at the time with the phase II Troop withdraw from Vietnam.I actually had 29 months served as active and got out 6 months early rather than continue my other 6 months  I was in my second year of my Nam tour.

so after I ETS , I had a commitment to ful -fil and that was being placed as as inactive reserves the next 3 years  although I didn't have to attend any drills or go anywhere..after those 3 years were up they sent me my Honorable Discharge. (As GB Army Mention)

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use