Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Wrong MOS listed

Rate this question


joseM1964

Question

Hello,

I got a copy of my C and P of my tinnitus exam, and the doctor listed why he thought I was service connected. Listed my MOS that I had in the Army. Ok good.

I read on and then he listed and MOS I never held and stated that since I held this MOS, I should be service connected too.

So my question is, will anyone ever notice this incorrect additional MOS listed on my exam and go back and remove my 10% they gave me?

Thank you 

Edited by joseM1964
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder
6 hours ago, USMC_VET said:

99% of Tinnitus claims are for Subjectivie Tinnitus which cannot be tested so often as long as the claim is made and the MOS matches they grant it. sometimes they require you to go to a audiologist to say "yes i hear ringing" or its mentioned during a hearing loss exam.

Right, JoseM1964 Mention it (rigging in the ears) when he took his Hearing test  and Veterans need to mention this ringing in the ears (known as Tinnitus) to the  Audiologist When /After they take the Hearing test, this is what I had to do several years ago 1998-99 2000, approved for 50%in 2000 and increase to 90% in 2003

I had no Ideal what that ringing in my ears was and its subjective to hard of hearing Veterans  and depending on MOS if the Veteran was around loud noise during his military time  MOS ,  for me it was Rocket fire heavy artillery fire and incoming mortars  all most every night from Vietnam .

MY Hearing loss was bilateral (both ears) plus tinnitus  ''severe tinnitus''

They do look at that but also a Veteran can have a Temp MOS Assigned to him from his unit. as long as his Temporary MOS is on his DD 214 along with HIS original MOS.   if the Temp MOS is not on his DD -214  The veteran can put his unit name location and date close to 10/30 days or within that time  they will check it out and if what the veteran mention was truthful  then they concede his hearing loss was caused from his military service.  he can also use Buddy statements  if he can remember the names he served with.

The loss of hearing is called noise induced hearing loss (EAR DRUM DAMAGE FROM LOUD SUDDEN NOISE) and it gets worse as the years go by  for me it took about 7&10 years before I started have problems hearing  and my spouse had me to take a hearing test  and at a younger age around 28/29 years old we thought it was odd my hearing getting bad at that age??  but stupid old me I never thought about the noise induced hearing loss caused by loud sudden noise while I was in the military, I found this out from a VAMC Audiologist  and he told me to file a claim for it  so I did.  I only went to the VA to get hearing aids  and found out VA Would pay for them   so I did that too.

Just remember they only pay 10% for tinnitus for both ears no matter how severe ...and more % if your hearing loss is profound or greater 10 % all the way up to 100% and with VA Criteria  a Veteran needs to be damn near deaf to get a compensation any %

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use