Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Change in static disability

Rate this question


GBArmy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'd appreciate opinions on a veteran awarded a disability classified as "static." Prior to 5 years passing, he requests an increase which results in the a new C&P. If no improvement in disabilities (or if they got worse and the VA awarded a higher rating), can the VA drop the "static" classification and advise a future exam will be required? Or, does it have to be classified as static because that is what it was before? Anyone have any experience on this situation?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

My conditions were static and went up. Still static. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Thanks, Brokensoldier. That is what I was thinking but sometimes VA and logic doesn't always work. It would be interesting to see if others have the same situation. I didn't see it covered in M21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

GB, the VA cannot reduce a veteran’s rating based on one C & P exam. The VA would have to send the veteran a letter of proposal to reduce and then go through the process. Even if the VA tries to reduce the veteran’s rating, they must prove that the veteran’s symptoms has improved. Once the VA makes a rating decision that rating stays in place and not likely to be reduced. Yes, the VA does re-examine veteran’s ratings but most of the time this is when a veteran file for an increase or the veteran was awarded TDIU but by the time the VA gets around to re-examining a veteran’s rating the veteran’s rating has already become static.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Pacmanx1 Appreciate your response. I understand the proposal to reduce by the VA. What I was specifically looking for was a veteran rated disability is rated "static." Before 5 years are up, he has tor go for a C&P exam. Can the VA drop the "static" designation, which I would assume  would then open him up for future re-exams.  Just curious if anyone has seen that happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator
10 minutes ago, GBArmy said:

Pacmanx1 Appreciate your response. I understand the proposal to reduce by the VA. What I was specifically looking for was a veteran rated disability is rated "static." Before 5 years are up, he has tor go for a C&P exam. Can the VA drop the "static" designation, which I would assume  would then open him up for future re-exams.  Just curious if anyone has seen that happen.

I know that some may disagree but that "STATIC" term is more of an assignment of a medical determination like the VAMC would do instead of the VARO assigning or not assigning. 

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

 

Per M21-1, "static" is mentioned about 10 times during this article. It describes to handle various scenarios from P&T/TDIU vets, failure to report for exams, etc... so it's worth exploring further

M21-1, Part III, Subpart iv, Chapter 8, Section E - Other Due Process Concerns

Article ID: 554400000014215

https://www.knowva.ebenefits.va.gov/system/templates/selfservice/va_ssnew/help/customer/locale/en-US/portal/554400000001018/content/554400000014215/M21-1,-Part-III,-Subpart-iv,-Chapter-8,-Section-E---Other-Due-Process-Concerns#:~:text=Definition%3A Static Disability,or not it has improved.

Quote

III.iv.8.E.1.b.  Definition:  Static Disability

 
A static disability is a disability that is considered permanent by its nature, history, and severity.  It is assigned a permanent evaluation without the need for future examinations to determine whether or not it has improved. 

Based on that and some mild skimming of the article, it appears that if they are P&T/TDIU or had certain other rating protections, then they would not re-eval.

Additionally, be sure to let them know they should review medical evidence from 12 months -prior- to requesting increase. If they meet the criteria of an increased percentage during that time, the VA -should- use that as the effective date of the increase. I filed for an increase and the effective date awarded was the C&P date. The VA mishanded my evidence. I resent that and they corrected it. Of course, that was under the older system. Nowadays it would be handled via supplemental.

 

 

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use