Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How long til TDIU starts paying after granted

Rate this question


SgtRamz

Question

The BVA granted my rating increase for PTSD and TDIU claim May 6th, and remanded my claims for ulcers, hypertension, and knees. I still haven't started getting my TDIU pay per month or my actual rating on ebenefits hasn't changed. Supposedly it only takes 2 months to see change at least that's what it says on claim. Has anyone had this problem? I called the # they give on website and was told they hold it til they complete remands. That dont make sense wouldnt change if I got other claims granted with TDIU. I really need some advise here please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

SgtRamz Welcome to Hadit. "That don't make sense" well, welcome to the VA hamster wheel. The remand requirements by the BVA back to the RO is the hold up. They could start paying out before the remands are completed, but usually they want to complete the who action . The remands probably means that the VA has to further develop, like in doing additional C&P exams or getting some other medical evidence, to determine how your remand conditions can/should be rated. You can try and find out by calling the same number and see what they are trying to do, such as when is the next C&P and then work from there. If you have financial hardship, you may declare that but I'm not sure that will get any expedite for you.If you have a VSO, you can ask them what doses the VBMS system that they have access to shows for activity. But this can take a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Unfortunately, the local VA does this a lot. On VA.gov where it says that it could take about 2 months for you to see a difference means absolutely nothing to the local VA. It took the local VA a little over a year to implement my BVA grant. Even though this goes against VA's own regulations and fast letter not to withhold any benefits, the local VA will try to complete the remand prior to releasing your BVA grant. I hope I am wrong, and things have changed but the local VA is in no rush to pay you your retro/back pay.

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The local VA has been doing this for years and it is getting even harder to find online but here is the Fast letter and what it says: 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420
January 6, 2010

Director (00/21) All VA Regional Offices and Centers
In Reply Refer To: 211B Fast Letter 10-02

SUBJ: Implementation of Board of Veterans’ Appeals Decisions

Purpose
This fast letter provides clarification of the existing procedural guidance for implementation of Board of Veterans’ Appeals Decisions. The instructions provided in this fast letter supersede all prior guidance on this issue.

Background
It has come to the attention of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) and the Compensation and Pension Service that there is inconsistent processing of claims involving implementation of BVA decisions with partial favorable findings.
It was determined that some regional offices (ROs) were delaying implementation of these BVA partial grants until expiration of the 120-day period within which a veteran may appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC). Delayed implementation of favorable BVA decisions is inconsistent with the Department’s long standing pro-veteran position and unnecessarily delays payment of benefits to the claimant.

Procedures

Grants and Partial Awards
ROs are required to review all files returning from BVA to determine the type of action to be taken.
ROs must expeditiously implement favorable decisions rendered by BVA in all cases, including those decisions that may also contain unfavorable findings subject to appeal with CAVC.

For processing purposes, a partial grant or an increased evaluation less than the schedular maximum available is considered a “favorable decision.” Partial grants rendered by BVA are subject to expedited processing.
Although a claimant may elect to appeal the evaluation assigned by BVA and continue to pursue an increased or total evaluation for the same disability before CAVC, the partial grant should still be implemented immediately.

In many instances, the claims file will not be required to complete the grant or partial grant of benefits ordered by BVA.
If a decisionmaker needs the claims file to accurately comply with the BVA mandate, he or she should follow the instructions regarding locked CAVC files provided in M21-1MR, section I.5.J.48.e.

Denials
Denials of entitlement to benefits rendered by BVA should continue to be processed in accordance with the procedures outlined in M21-1MR, sections I. 5.G.33.c and d.
Questions
Questions concerning this fast letter should be e-mailed to VAVBAWAS/CO/ 21FL.
/S/
Bradley G. Mayes Director Compensation & Pension Service

Edited by pacmanx1

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Pacman..Thanks for posting that letter.  

Sgt Ramz:  You should get a tatoo which says:

Quote

You can not trust everything a VA employee tells you, nor can you trust what ebenefits/VA.gov says.  Wait for the letter.  

Implementing Board decisions often takes from 3 weeks to 6 months or more.  

If your BVA decision has not been implemented by the VARO in 3 months, get back on hadit and we can help you twist some arms to get it done.  

As in the letter which Pacman posted, VARO is supposed to implement favorable board decisions immediately, "even if" portions of the decision are denied or remanded.  They are supposed to pay you for the award portions of your decision.

Many Board decisions have 3 or more issues.  For example, Service connection for your knee, hearing loss, and PTSD.  In this example, its possible for your hearing loss to be granted, your knee to be remanded for a c and p exam, and your PTSD denied.  

I call it a mixed decision.  (Brad Mays called it a "partial favorable decision" or partial grant).

    While the "fast letter" Pacman posted is unambiguous, count on about half of the VA employees to not read, and count on the other half to ignore the letter.  Remember, if all VA employees "fully complied" with all the regulations, there would be no need to have a BVA, all decisions would be right the first time.  

Veterans always pay the cost of VA employee mistakes such as this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Yeah, that Fast letter is here somewhere but it bears repeating.

I think veterans might need to remind the VA, by sending them  a copy of that letter, if they have been stalling on retro from a BVA grant, even if it is a partial grant. 

Thank you Pacman!!!!!!!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use