I am wondering if anyone is familiar with being service connected for male infertility due to exposure to Camp Lejeune's toxic water? I was there for a full year from 84-85 with the 10th Marines (Hadnot Point water supply system). I know this condition is not on the presumptive list, but that doesn't mean that you cannot apply for anything else that may be attributable to a condition on its own merits--correct? Got out in 85 at 23 years old, got married for the first time in '98--since both my wife and I were older than average (I was 36 and she was 33), we started to try for a family almost immediately. After quite a lot of trying (no complaints there), we decided that maybe we should get tested--turned out I was the problem.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) focused on four chemicals that were prevalent (perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl chloride, and benzene), but the list of other chemicals found in the water is much more extensive. There is some limited info available that shows that TCE can cause male infertility, but not a lot. Some of the other chemicals that were identified are considered endocrine disruptors--many of these types of chemicals are known to cause problems with fertility. I have yet to find any info on concentrations of these other chemicals, but I'm sure it's out there if I dig hard enough.
Anyway, I'm just wondering if anyone has experience with this, or even if not, some general advice would be greatly appreciated.
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.
Question
Huggy
Greetings All,
I am wondering if anyone is familiar with being service connected for male infertility due to exposure to Camp Lejeune's toxic water? I was there for a full year from 84-85 with the 10th Marines (Hadnot Point water supply system). I know this condition is not on the presumptive list, but that doesn't mean that you cannot apply for anything else that may be attributable to a condition on its own merits--correct? Got out in 85 at 23 years old, got married for the first time in '98--since both my wife and I were older than average (I was 36 and she was 33), we started to try for a family almost immediately. After quite a lot of trying (no complaints there), we decided that maybe we should get tested--turned out I was the problem.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) focused on four chemicals that were prevalent (perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene (TCE), vinyl chloride, and benzene), but the list of other chemicals found in the water is much more extensive. There is some limited info available that shows that TCE can cause male infertility, but not a lot. Some of the other chemicals that were identified are considered endocrine disruptors--many of these types of chemicals are known to cause problems with fertility. I have yet to find any info on concentrations of these other chemicals, but I'm sure it's out there if I dig hard enough.
Anyway, I'm just wondering if anyone has experience with this, or even if not, some general advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Huggy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
Popular Days
Jan 18
2
Jan 20
2
Top Posters For This Question
brokensoldier244th 2 posts
Huggy 2 posts
Popular Days
Jan 18 2022
2 posts
Jan 20 2022
2 posts
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now