Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Off Set

Rate this question


Speaking Out

Question

Does anyone know where I go to read about when the VA can do an off set? I was SC ptsd10% and rated SC for Migraines and Endometriosis, but those were not compensable. I filed a med malpractice suit against the VA in 2004. In Nov. 2004 I applied through the DAV SO to have my benefits for PTSD and endometriosis raised and for IU due the the malpractice I had to stop working. I was increased to 30%PTSD and endometriosis 10% and was denied the IU. After some complications with my meds in 2006 I applied for my PTSD and endometriosis to be increased again. The PTSD was increased to 50% and the endometriosis was left at 10% with the statement..."At this point it is not clear if your endometriosis is responsible for the abnormal bleeding, but may be responsible for the dyspareunia, which is currently under evaluation. At this time we cannot grant an increase in your endometriosis as we have no clear diagnosis of this being the cause of your abnormal bleeding. If endometriosis is found to be the cause of your abnormal bleeding you may reopen your claim." I have received written offers of settlement for the tort claim from the VARO counsel, which we denied. Now, through a US Attorney, the new offer is a lump sum and credit for my SC disability pay for the last three years while the tort has been ongoing and then hold my benefits until the monthly amount adds up to the lump sum plus the credit. This offer (the lump sum + credit for 3 years of my SC disability pay) is a lower offer numerically than the last written offer from the VARO counsel. I have not filed for 1151 benefits. Can they do the off set under these circumstances? Should I file for 1151 benefits? How do I reopen a claim?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I dont know if that was fraud or not-dont think so-

but a VERY bizarre way of dealing with the offer-

What gets me is that I had a partial offset and it was clearly stated in my settlement papers.

After I couldnt squeeze any more out of the GC (I tried for legal fees but I was my own attorney so that didnt work- General counsel was eexaspewrated by then with me Ha Ha-)then the

Gen Counsel came up with what he felt was a fair and equitable offset to the USA and to me.

I totally agreed.(this is often an estate law issue when wuidows settle with VA-a little more complex than a veteran's offset)

I was satisfied-but the VA refused to honor the offset- and finally RC awarded my CUE claim on that.

I am so glad that the US atty is getting it right.

I sure hope however that the VA can read you settlement papers right- it took them over 7 years to read mine right-

no legal mumbo jumbo at all- a clear brief statement from the US of A, as to the settlement with me and the offset.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 2 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use