Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How does aggravation work?

Rate this question


grayling12

Question

Can I file and potentially win a claim of aggravation such as:

A non service connected issue that's aggravated by the medications taken for a service connected disability?

Example: if I have urinary incontinence linked to BPH, (non service connected) but it is aggravated by my mental health meds, (service connected) that show urinary incontinence as a possible side affect, could this be claimed as a secondary condition or as aggravated by my mental health meds? How would this get rated if it's considered aggravation?

Also, can I claim my urinary incontinence as aggravated by and/ or caused by my service connected IBS, since I get incontinent frequently when I'm constipated and leak badly when trying to get up to use the bathroom etc.?

Thank you for any information

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Okay here is an example of an aggravation disability issue discussion by a former VA DRO rater and long term VSO.  In this example he is talking about Sleep Apnea but aggravation is the topic of the discussion.  

"The association between sinusitis and sleep apnea is well known and nobody at VA is going to take issue with an assertion from you that sinusitis can aggravate sleep apnea.  The hurdle you are facing isn’t whether or not this is possible, but rather whether or not YOUR sinusitis aggravated YOUR sleep apnea and no scholarly article in the world will establish this unless the article is specifically about you.   This will require a medical opinion addressing you personally.  

Remember, just because sinusitis can aggravate sleep apnea doesn’t mean that it did in your situation.  Other factors can aggravate it also.  All the article would do is to support what they already know.   It really won’t be of any use in your situation. 

What you need is a medical opinion from your doctor.  Absent that, VA might obtain a medical opinion for you, but there is no guarantee as to that, but also as to what the opinion will say. 

Another thing to keep in mind is that even if it is determined that there is aggravation, you can only be compensated for the amount of aggravation.  To determine this they must determine how bad your sleep apnea would be without the sinusitis and establish an evaluation, and then subtract this from the evaluation for your sleep apnea as a whole. 

For example, if you require a CPAP even without the aggravation, this warrants a 50 percent evaluation.  This 50 percent must then be subtracted from whatever evaluation your sleep apnea warrants overall which would most likely also be 50 percent.  This leaves a 0 percent evaluation for compensation purposes. 

This means that unless your sleep apnea has worsened to the point that heart problems have developed, a 0 percent evaluation is most likely when we are talking about aggravation.  To get anything otherwise you will need to be able to show that if it weren’t for the sinusitis you would not need the CPAP.  In this case they would only subtract 30 percent from the overall 50, leaving compensation for a 20 percent evaluation. "

In almost all my claims in order to cover all my bases I have successfully claimed

1. For my disability to be directly service connected AND/OR

2. Secondary service connected to an existing service connected issue  and

3.  That my disability is caused by AND AGGRAVATED by my active duty service OR  secondary service connected to an existing sc disability.

In my claims I have also successfully contended the strong VA medications has also caused and/or aggravated my disabilities for PTSD, Sleep Apnea, Heart Disease, Tinnitus, GERD and Hypertension.  You may be able to also argue that VA medications caused and/or aggravated your non service connected disability and therefore the non service connected disability can be service connected.  This has worked for thousands of vets over the past 50 years.  You will probably need a favorable nexus medical opinion from a Dr. or specialist to win the claim/appeal. Go for it.

My current ratings are for

PTSD 70%, due to Nam combat

AO Heart Disease 60%,  due to Nam Agent Orange toxin

GERD 60%, due to PTSD and VA meds

OSA Sleep Apnea due to PTSD and VA meds 50%

Tinnitus 10%,  due to Nam combat and medevac pilot

Hypertension 0% due to PTSD and Nam Agent Orange plus

SMC-S for five years

My PTSD 70% rating started in 1998 to the present time.  

My comment is not legal advice as I am not a lawyer, paralegal or VSOcombinededitedcroppedperkins507thDustoffmedevacUH-1Hrescuehoist.jpg.66e9e75bebf35a15ff490302ec523268.jpg


 

Edited by Dustoff1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Dustoff gave a great answer and its hard to top that!  

Generally, what I have seen for "aggravation" is to establish service connection.  

An example may be lets say you are diagnosed with a knee issue prior to service.  

So, the military puts a 140 pound back pack on you and makes you march 10 miles with the backpack on repeatedly, OR makes you jump out of airplines.  

Its easy to see how your knee condition could be worsened through military service, because you "aggravated" the condition in performing your duties in military service.  

The VA tends to "chop up" disabilities into parts:

1.  Service connection or no.  

2.  Disability percentage. 

3.  Effective date.  

     This is done for each condition, your knee condition can be vastly different, or the same, for BPH or other conditions.  

    However, once you have established service connection, well you have SC.  Its binary..you are either service connected for a condition or you are not.  Once service connected your condition should be rated by the criteria found in the schedule of disability ratings.  So, once you obtain sc via aggravation, you should be rated by the criteria found in the schedule:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/4.115a

   There could be an example of only getting sc for the percentage "you got worse" from military service because you had the condition prior to service.  

    Im gonna pass on guessing whether you would simply get service connection for aggravation, and then its rated normally, or there is some type of complicated deduction for the percentage of disability you had prior to service, vs what you have after service.  Given the crazy way VA does stuff, it would not suprise me a bit if VA tries to do this percentage of percentage stuff with aggravation.  But you could also appeal it.  After all, the miitary accepted you "with your limitations" and it is their fault if they expect you to perform duties that makes your conditions worse (aggravation).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Here is another  explanation of AGGRAVATION from the Chisholm Chisholm Kilpatrick (CCK) law firm.

https://cck-law.com/blog/va-service-connection-aggravation/

My comment is not legal advice as I am not a lawyer, paralegal or VSO

Edited by Dustoff1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Actually your comment to the OP was very spot on.  I gave a poor example from a former VA DRO but then followed up with the good explanation from great law firm CCK.  All my disabilities have been primary or secondary connected and never aggravated.  The VA math for aggravation is too complicated for me to figure out and is an example of more VA bureaucratic BS confusing and not helping vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use