Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Description Of The Veterans Claims Assistance Act

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Section A. Description and General Information

Overview

In this Section This section contains the following topics:

Topic Topic Name See Page

1 Description of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, PL 106-475 1-A-2

2 Description of the Duty to Assist Criteria 1-A-3

1. Description of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, PL 106-475

Introduction This section describes the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), PL 106-475, and contains information about the responsibilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) background of PL 106-475, and description of PL 106-475.

Change Date August 1, 2002

a. Responsibilities of VA Decisions on Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefit eligibility and entitlement are based on the evidence of record. Evidence consists of documents, records, testimonials and information in other forms provided by, or obtained for, a claimant.

VA has a duty to assist a claimant who files a substantially complete application in obtaining evidence to substantiate his or her claim before making a decision on the claim. We are charged with granting every benefit supported by the law.

b. Background of PL 106-475 On November 9, 2000, PL 106-475 was enacted, superceding the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in Morton vs. West, which held that VA cannot assist in the development of a claim that is not well grounded.

c. Description of PL 106-475 The new law, PL 106-475

eliminates the concept of a well grounded claim redefines VA’s duty to assist, and mandates specific notice requirements.

2. Description of the Duty to Assist Criteria

Introduction This section contains information about duty to assist, including issues pertaining to claimants relevant Federal records, and non-Federal records requests for VA examinations or medical opinions, circumstances where VA will refrain from or discontinue providing assistance, and contact information for questions.

Change Date June 19, 2006

a. Duty to Assist Claimants The Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, PL 106-475, defines the scope of Veterans Benefits Administration’s (VBA’s) duty to assist claimants who file substantially complete applications for VA benefits.

Reference: For more information on what constitutes a substantially complete application, see M21-1MR, Part I, 1.B.3.a and 38 CFR 3.159.

b. Duty to Obtain Relevant Federal Records VA’s duty to assist includes developing for all relevant records in the custody of a Federal department or agency, including VA medical records, service medical records Social Security Administration records, or evidence from other Federal agencies.

Note: Relevancy is determined by what is being claimed. For example, in claims for service connection, relevant documents are those that may substantiate one of the elements of service connection (incurrence, current condition, or links). However, in most cases, it may be impossible to determine relevancy before obtaining the records.

Continued on next page

2. Description of the Duty to Assist Criteria, Continued

c. Duty to Obtain Relevant Non-Federal Records Our duty to assist also includes developing for private medical records, and lay or other non-Federal governmental evidence, such as current or former employer records, or state and local government records.

Important: VA should obtain the veteran’s authorization before including identifying data such as the veteran’s name and claim number in a development letter for lay evidence from a third-party. Authorization may be obtained on VA Form 3288, Request for and Consent to Release of Information from Claimant’s Records. This should not be used to obtain authorization and consent for release of medical evidence which is covered by VA Form 21-4142, Authorization and Consent to Release Information to the Department of Veterans Affairs, or release of employer information, which is covered by VA Form 21-4192, Request for Employment Information in Connection With Claim for Disability Benefits.

Reference: For information on the limitation of use of business reply envelopes for third-party development, see M21-1 MR, Part II, 5.B.5.c (TBD) or M21-1, Part III, 11.05, and

VBA Letter 20-05-42.

d. Duty to Obtain Examination or Medical Opinion If an examination or a medical opinion is necessary to make a decision on a claim for compensation, then our duty to assist includes examining claimants, and/or obtaining a medical opinion from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or designated contracted provider.

Continued on next page

2. Description of the Duty to Assist Criteria, Continued

e. Circumstances Where VA Will Refrain From or Discontinue Providing Assistance

VA will not provide assistance in obtaining evidence if a substantially complete application for benefits indicates that there is no reasonable possibility that any assistance VA would provide to the claimant would substantiate the claim.

Discontinue providing assistance if the evidence obtained indicates that there is no reasonable possibility that further assistance would substantiate the claim. Circumstances in which to refrain from or discontinue providing assistance in obtaining evidence include, but are not limited to: the claimant's ineligibility for the benefit sought because of lack of qualifying service, lack of veteran status, or other lack of legal eligibility

claims that are inherently incredible or clearly lack merit, and an application requesting a benefit to which the claimant is not entitled as a matter of law.

Reference: For more information on the criteria for a substantially complete application, see, M21-1MR, Part I, 1.B.3.a, and circumstances where VA will refrain from or discontinue providing assistance, see 38 CFR 3.159(d).

f. Contact Information for Questions Questions regarding duty to assist should be submitted to the Q&A mailbox at VAVBAWAS/CO/21Q&A by the Q&A station coordinator.

SOURCE: http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/admin21/m21_1/...1/ch01_seca.doc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • KMac1181 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use