Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

"hamster Wheel" Claims Process

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Last week Bart Stichman of NVLSP gave the following testimony to the HCVA:

http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/schedul...7stichman.shtml

He raised the issue of the CAVC and how VA steps cause the 'hamster wheel' scenario to occur-

also he raised the fact that if a vet has a claim at the CAVC and then dies- the survivor has no legal standing at the CAVC.

This is why I made numerous posts here at time of Haas- to have vets file their claims-----

I posted at other web sites too----

To definitely file the claim if they were Blue Water.

This is the exact legal scenario I envisioned that can ultimate screw Blue Water AO vets again----

There was only a limited period of time-

I kept telling vets this is the law of the land- for now-----

I even had to explain this to my new vet rep-

Blue Waters had to get the claim at the RO---- Yesterday! After the Haas decision-but before VA moved on the moratorium-

to technically get into the Moratorium!

Otherwise their retro under Haas is done for-

as it stands- and if so- I sure will do what I can to support NVLSP on fighting that-

"Even if all this were done, the fact would remain that hundreds, if not thousands of similarly situated Navy blue water veterans and their survivors would never receive the benefits that those whose claims were subject to the moratorium would receive. That is because VA’s denial of their claims for disability or death benefits for an Agent Orange-related disease became final before Secretary Nicholson’s moratorium. To be specific, the following similarly situated VA claimants are not subject to Secretary Nicholson’s moratorium and will never receive benefits based on their claims:" etc----

Bart Stichman said it how it is----

The moratorium only covered any Blue Water with an AO claim filed.

I was outraged that many vet orgs did not push this issue to their claimants-

maybe they should cough up the retro-

Haas is one of the most important VA decisions since the VCAA became law-

and being fought by the VA at every step.

This testimony gives a good run down on it all.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Very interesting article about the nonadvesarial pro-claimant nature of the VA. :rolleyes:

Free

Last week Bart Stichman of NVLSP gave the following testimony to the HCVA:

http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/schedul...7stichman.shtml

He raised the issue of the CAVC and how VA steps cause the 'hamster wheel' scenario to occur-

also he raised the fact that if a vet has a claim at the CAVC and then dies- the survivor has no legal standing at the CAVC.

This is why I made numerous posts here at time of Haas- to have vets file their claims-----

I posted at other web sites too----

To definitely file the claim if they were Blue Water.

This is the exact legal scenario I envisioned that can ultimate screw Blue Water AO vets again----

There was only a limited period of time-

I kept telling vets this is the law of the land- for now-----

I even had to explain this to my new vet rep-

Blue Waters had to get the claim at the RO---- Yesterday! After the Haas decision-but before VA moved on the moratorium-

to technically get into the Moratorium!

Otherwise their retro under Haas is done for-

as it stands- and if so- I sure will do what I can to support NVLSP on fighting that-

"Even if all this were done, the fact would remain that hundreds, if not thousands of similarly situated Navy blue water veterans and their survivors would never receive the benefits that those whose claims were subject to the moratorium would receive. That is because VA’s denial of their claims for disability or death benefits for an Agent Orange-related disease became final before Secretary Nicholson’s moratorium. To be specific, the following similarly situated VA claimants are not subject to Secretary Nicholson’s moratorium and will never receive benefits based on their claims:" etc----

Bart Stichman said it how it is----

The moratorium only covered any Blue Water with an AO claim filed.

I was outraged that many vet orgs did not push this issue to their claimants-

maybe they should cough up the retro-

Haas is one of the most important VA decisions since the VCAA became law-

and being fought by the VA at every step.

This testimony gives a good run down on it all.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea boy,

The administrators of the Military and veteran's comp and medical systems all let out a sigh of relief.

I'll bet they are passing out 50 dollar Cuban cigars and pouring imported booze.

They have just learned that everything that they have been, are doing, will do more of is working exactly as planned.

It came from an impeccable source too.

Their next bonus is set in stone.

We can all sleep good now since everything is under control and going exactly according to a well thought out plan.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I passed this on to John Rossie- Blue Water Navy-

http://bluewaternavy.org/

An Excellent site with lots and lots of info---

He has our link there too.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use