Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tdiu Advice Request

Rate this question


cowgirl

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

How does a IMO describe years of 'unemployability' due to mdd? My thoughts go something like this...

" In my determination, this patient xxxxx is currently diagnosed with xxxxx. .....a VA rated condition of ....that permanently affects ,,,,, ability in getting and maintaining a job in their skill field that provides constant pay, above poverty level.The patient has been diagnosed with ------- since 19__ and continues to see me for this condition"

Any other thoughts? thanks.cg

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Oh I see, so if the SC is rated 40% or above already, then the doc and I should treat this like a concrete diagnostic statement clarifying unemployment. Like, "xxxxx isnt able to obtain constant SGA work due to SC mdd and these are the 'causes' or 'reasons' .or 'problems' that affect..."?? cg

A least as likely as not will work for the VA raters. The 50 percent puts the claim in Equipose and the Benefit of the doubt rule should Kick in. As long as there is no negative evidence
.

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated below stay away from statements like this: "ability in getting and maintaining a job in their skill field that provides constant pay". The response to this type of statement would be "although it has been determined that you probably can not obtain gainful employment in your current skills and abilities, you are not precluded from obtaining other gainful employment". Don't be like the kangroo court (CAVC) and tell them how to write their denial which meets the requirements of the law. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

er, Ricky thanks I was debating if I needed to put Mos historical data in that doesnt transfer to civilian workforce; got that on a skills transfer form when outprocessed. Few years ago surprised voc rehab person, to see a job skills non-transferable statement, ha. I will keepitsimple and go for diagnosis effects and add my simple statement," I am unable to work and gain substantial fulltime gainful....and let doc explain disability effect on my employment, or lackthereof. nothing more at this time. thank you very much, cg

As stated below stay away from statements like this: "ability in getting and maintaining a job in their skill field that provides constant pay". The response to this type of statement would be "although it has been determined that you probably can not obtain gainful employment in your current skills and abilities, you are not precluded from obtaining other gainful employment". Don't be like the kangroo court (CAVC) and tell them how to write their denial which meets the requirements of the law. JMHO

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

B) Submitted my unemployment history info to doc for opinion letter. Sounded like easy letter to write, nope. Tried to present for my facts, SGA, SC conditions adding 'I feel' statements and numbers proof. Will double check when I get it reads 'is due to' or 'more likely than not'. Right about now, I am nervous for me and praying for the doc,cg

Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If your doctor writes the IU statement to the standard of SSA that would be strong enough I think. What you want to say is that you cannot do any work at all solely due to your SC condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use