Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Selection Of A Lawyer

Rate this question


rthomass

Question

I feel compelled to warn all my fellow Veterans to be very selective in who they have represent them before the Department of Veteran Affairs.

I have as some of you know been envolved in an Agent Orange case for over 41 months now, for the bean counters it works out to 14, 600 days or 350,400 hours!

Once the lawyer I selected got my case remanded from the CAVC to the BVA and had me sign a paper in order for her to further represent me. I had precious few contacts with her to the point she seldom took my calls or acknowledged my paperwork. I was basicaly on my own. I developed my own case, did my own research, and pleaded my case without benefit of effective counsel.

I finally dismissed this lawyer and her firm and I am fervently getting another Lawyer up to speed as the local Regional Office refuses to render a final decision and insists on issuing an SSOC and returning the remanded claim back to the BVA for a decision; even though the local RO was given the option by the BVA to render a decision.

I tell you this as my brothers and sisters, we have only our selfs and each other....no one ...not he VA, Not the BVA...or even the CAVC is going to help you. It is your claim, you must be your own advocate, you must be agreesive, ruthless, cunning and even wallow in the gutter with the Veterans Administration.

A lawyer is a resource, a tool......but ultimately as President Truman said "The Buck Stops Here".

That firm I am talking about is Liberman & Mark, PLLC of Washington D.C. I absolutely do not recommend them. I am not trying to slander these lawyers but to warn you there are lawyers out there that are not looking out for your best interest. After the rmmand they have the Veteran sign a 20% agreement to futher represent the Vetrean at The RO level and hope they luck out by sheer number of Veterans Claims they have...for a few to bingo with them exerting as little effort as possible on the claims........a nice racket if I do say so.

Randall

Edited by rthomass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think a lawyer can speed up your claim, but if they are good they can see that you get a fair hearing when you case does come up. I am using Karl K. to do my CUE. When I call or email him he gets back to me. He flew down to Tampa on his own dime to represent me before the VARO on my CUE. It was denied, and now I wait a BVA traveling Board. We should have won at the VARO, but as both me and Karl agree the DRO, and the VARO did not have the guts to make the kind of award I was asking for, so they kicked the responsibility upstairs to the BVA. I think this is why many lawyers do not want to represent vets all the way through the process. They have to wait years for their money. The VA is quite capable of stonewalling them for as long as possible just like they do us. The trick is that when it does finally come to a hearing you have expert help as opposed to your lonesome, or some VSO who can barely read and write. If you have a complicated claim the lawyers can often cut to the chase, and define the issues better than we who are directly involved in the outcome, and who have an emotional connection to the case. If the claim is pretty black and white you may not need a lawyer, but it there are many shades of grey I would get the expert. If you were going to court on a DUI would you go by yourself, or would you get a lawyer? That is minor copared to a claim that might involve thousands of dollars in retro, and, yet, vets go alone before adversarial parties who see them as pop up targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not looking to speed up my claim. Been at this now for 7-odd years. In a recent DRO review, was awarded 20% for lumbar spine, 10% sciatic(radiculopathy). Being this claim reverts back to 2001---I feel a 60% rating IVDS in effect prior to the 2002 rating change, should be warranted.

**Did notice the poor reviews of Attorneys "Lieberman & Mark", which concerns me as I had contacted them about "possible" representation with the BVA. Also, still considering contacting the prior mentioned law firm out of Akron, Ohio: "Sternberg, Newman,& Shifrin, Inc." Attorneys at Law. I've been successful with other BVA appeals on my own. I am a little older and not in good health. Received some help from the Service Organizations in the past, but recently lost faith in them as many of you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VMO

If you are not in good health it might be wise to let a lawyer take your claims through the appeals process. These things are stressful. Let the lawyer earn his money dealing with the stress. Take your time to find the right lawyer. You need to find someone who believes in your claim. The more retro involved in your claim the more attractive it becomes to the legal eagles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a contract with Ken Carpenter, Carpenter Chartered. He has a DRO telephone hearing on Friday October 9th about my claim.

Sometimes I feel that he has too many claims, but from what I have read here he is one of the best. He is very expensive (30%).

His assistant does call me back promptly when I call

Happy Trails

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My lawyer is Rebbecca Patrick. She just won me 4 remands at the U.S. court. When I first looked into her I noticed she had more experience at the BVA than the U.S. court. However, after I talked with her I liked her and I am glad I went with her. She does not seem to have a million clients so she gets back to you in a reasonable amount of time. She charges 20% which compared to others isn't bad. I actually had one lawyer ask for $2500 + 20%. I was definitely impressed with her actions at the court. Not only did she find some angles I hadn't thought of she convinced the VA counsel to remand my 4th issue. Initially she would only remand 3 and drop 1.

Let me know if your interested in her information. I'm sure she would be glad to talk with you.

USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95

100% P&T

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."

George Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I have found the "pickings to be slim" with VA lawyers, especially in the midwest. I have heard very good things about Ken Carpenter, however, I understand he is both very busy and very selective.

Frankly, we need lots more lawyers who represent Vetrans. Lawyers do not like to take Vetrans cases, largely because it is difficult for them to get paid.

You see, the VA often delays claims..not just our claims, but claims who are represented by a lawyer. If the claim is delayed 10 years, and many of them are, most lawyers dont want to wait ten years for their money. Do you blame them?

I spoke with an "ex" Va lawyer, who no longer takes VA cases because he got tired of waiting to get paid. It is just one more way the VA denies justice.

Justice delayed is justice denied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use