Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Sec Puts The Spin

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Recent VA News Releases

http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel

VA Tightens Protections for Veterans Paperwork

Peake: Lapses "Unacceptable," Procedures and Accountability Tightened

WASHINGTON (Oct. 16, 2008) -- Secretary of Veterans Affairs Dr. James B.

Peake vowed swift action after a handful of documents related to

veterans' applications for financial benefits from the Department of

Veterans Affairs (VA) were found among documents identified for

shredding. The documents, which were not duplicated in government

files, could have affected veterans' eligibility for benefits.

"I insist on the highest possible standards for processing and

safeguarding information in VA's custody," Peake said. "It is

unacceptable that documents important to a veteran's claim for benefits

should be misplaced or destroyed."

Peake said VA's Office of the Inspector General (IG) is investigating

the misplaced documents, and anyone who violated Department policy on

protecting documents will be held accountable.

The documents were discovered by employees of VA's IG office during an

audit at three of VA's 56 regional benefits offices, which process

applications for disability pay, VA pensions, educational assistance,

home loans and similar financial benefits.

IG auditors found a handful of documents waiting to be shredded, which

might have affected the fate of veterans' applications. The documents

were returned to the proper offices for processing.

Retired Rear Adm. Patrick W. Dunne, VA's Under Secretary for Benefits,

immediately directed all of VA's regional offices to suspend all

document shredding while IG and VA officials determine whether the

problem is more widespread. Directors of the regional offices will have

to certify in writing that no original copies of key documents or

records from veterans' cases under consideration are being destroyed.

VA has procedures for determining the disposition of paperwork.

Original copies of discharge papers, marriage certificates and death

certificates are returned to veterans or families when no longer needed.

Duplicate copies of paperwork no longer needed are appropriately

destroyed to protect the privacy of veterans and their families."

A "handful" my butt)

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The biggest bunch of BS I've read all day:

"Directors of the regional offices will have to certify in writing that no original copies of key documents or records from veterans' cases under consideration are being destroyed."

And their assertion that it is "a handful" of documents.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

3 more months of this crap........i realy cant wait.

Do yourself a favor.....buy some gold and silver! The printing presses are in overdrive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

considering how they look at it the VA probably has more than a billion pieces of paper in comp files so if they found a million papers in the shred room that would be a "handful" to them it's all relative

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not suprised at anything the VA does this has been ongoing for twenty years if not longer.What i fail to understand they get caught with this ILLEGAL OPERATION and nothing is done about it .Its mentioned and it goes away.They have free reign of making rules and regulations as they see fit!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • keepmovingforward earned a badge
      One Year In
    • kidva earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use