Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

To Nod Or Not To Nod

Rate this question


gp747

Question

i realise there are vets on here that are in dire circumstances and this is

serious business. i have been going overboard on the posts lately. i sincerely

want to apoligize and want the valuable knowledge of the members of hadit.

i have been rated 30% sc bi-polar panic attacks ptsd. they combined it all

and on award on front says bi-polar. i immediately filed secondary for gerd

throat stricture and copd related to agent orange. i also filed for drastic weight

loss due to gerd. already had claim in trying to reopen arthritis in back varo

was waiting for c-file from amc. also i have filed for increase in my rating. talking

to george patton , who i believe is honarable. i just believe my best bet is not

to nod and try to get increase from appeals but to try to win at varo with what i

have. i am 62 years old now and a long fight with a nod would hold up the new

claims i have and i think would be winnable. i have been doing this by myself and

when i am out of whack i make all kinds of irrational decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

ok if i nod this thing ,and go the dro hearing route ,will i have to

be present,or can my poa argue for me. i just would go nuts in

a setting like that. how does that work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Skunk

The reason for having a DRO Hearing is so your or your POA can present evidence or witnesses to the DRO. Another reason is to look the DRO in the eye so that you become a real person for him and not just a load of paperwork. If you are going to have a DRO Hearing you should be there. I think you should consider getting a lawyer. These VSO's have blown your claim for years. The fact you have SSDI for your SC conditions should have been brought out as a strong case for TDIU. Maybe your lawyer could argue in front of the VA for you without you having to be there. If you are not going the personal hearing route you need the best representation money can buy and not some half-ass VFW guy who could give a shit. You should request a copy of your SSDI file so you can present it as evidence. Get the lawyer and turn it over to him, so you don't blunder because of being upset and nervous. The lawyer gets 20% of your retro and you should probably have gotten TDIU years ago. Better to get 80% of something than 100% of nothing. I just don't understand how your POA did not press for TDIU if you had SSDI for service connected conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skunk

The reason for having a DRO Hearing is so your or your POA can present evidence or witnesses to the DRO. Another reason is to look the DRO in the eye so that you become a real person for him and not just a load of paperwork. If you are going to have a DRO Hearing you should be there. I think you should consider getting a lawyer. These VSO's have blown your claim for years. The fact you have SSDI for your SC conditions should have been brought out as a strong case for TDIU. Maybe your lawyer could argue in front of the VA for you without you having to be there. If you are not going the personal hearing route you need the best representation money can buy and not some half-ass VFW guy who could give a shit. You should request a copy of your SSDI file so you can present it as evidence. Get the lawyer and turn it over to him, so you don't blunder because of being upset and nervous. The lawyer gets 20% of your retro and you should probably have gotten TDIU years ago. Better to get 80% of something than 100% of nothing. I just don't understand how your POA did not press for TDIU if you had SSDI for service connected conditions.

i think that is what i am going to do . i found another lawyer that was listed at

the top of hadit in the advertising section i just sent them an e-mail thank you

JOHN ,I REALLY BELIEVE YOU ARE RIGHT AND OTHER PEOPLE HAVE CONCURRED

WITH YOU FORM ALL I AM HEARING AND THROUGH INVESTIGATING I BELIEVE THAT IS

THE RIGHT COURSE. I AM GOING TO KICK THIS BALL AND GET IT TO ROLLING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

john or anybody if i do nod and appeal ,what about my claims at ro

will they have starting date as to when i put them in or when they

get my files from appeals? i am talking secondary to what i have

gotten and a couple of new ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

skunk,

I do not agree with the thought pattern I read in this thread regarding

Formal versus Informal Claim.

I feel that the status of any claims made after an initial grant of service connection fall under a Claim for Increase.

There is so much worry about Formal and/or Informal Claims and to me all that really matters

is was a claim filed. Whether Formal or Informal a claim is a claim.

To actually file a claim a claimant can very simply write on a piece of paper towel,

"I request to receive a service connected disability evaluation and decision for arthritis in my neck".

or

"I feel I should get VA disability for Gerd that I have from taking medications for my service connected disablility".

Irregardless of whether one feels the claim is Formal or Informal, it must be followed up

with the Medical Evidence and a Nexus.

Either one is a legitimate claim and would stand as such inregards to effective dates for service connection

jmho,

carlie

§ 3.160 Status of claims.

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-....69&idno=38

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-....64&idno=38

§ 3.155 Informal claims.

(a) Any communication or action, indicating an intent to apply for one or more benefits under the laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, from a claimant, his or her duly authorized representative, a Member of Congress, or some person acting as next friend of a claimant who is not sui juris may be considered an informal claim.

Such informal claim must identify the benefit sought.

Upon receipt of an informal claim, if a formal claim has not been filed, an application form will be forwarded to the claimant for execution.

If received within 1 year from the date it was sent to the claimant, it will be considered filed as of the date of receipt of the informal claim.

(b) A communication received from a service organization, an attorney, or agent may not be accepted as an informal claim if a power of attorney was not executed at the time the communication was written.

© When a claim has been filed which meets the requirements of §3.151 or §3.152, an informal request for increase or reopening will be accepted as a claim.

Cross References: State Department as agent of VA. See §3.108. Report of examination or hospitalization—as claim for increase or to reopen. See §3.157.

[26 FR 1570, Feb. 24, 1961, as amended at 52 FR 27340, July 21, 1987]

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From M21-1MR:

Consider a claim not filed on the prescribed form an informal claim.

Upon receipt of a claim not filed on the prescribed form

· advise the claimant to complete and return the proper form within one year to receive benefits from the date of receipt of the informal claim, and

do not place the issue under pending-issue control.

Also, after a claim has been filed for service connection, a hospital report or doctors progress note

from I believe within one year also constitutes a claim for increase and/or can at least be used in

connection with the claim to go back to the date of the hospital report or doctors progress note.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use