Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Va Chief

Rate this question


dannydad

Question

fox news just reported that gen eric k shinseki will be appt as VA chief.do we know any thing about him????yes, he was fired by the whitehouse a few years back. BIG Question is he going to suport the troops???????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I kind of think he'll be alright. The only person I think would be perfect would be Jim Strickland, and that ain't gonna happen! SO, I think he'll be okay. I mean, he implemented some kind of sideways programs (hello, black beret) but he also did a LOT of good. Gubmint wanted to reduce the size of the military, he said NO. He isn't afraid to speak his mind, when he needs to. He won't be talking out of the side of his head like previous Secretaries. He doesn't talk to hear himself talk; if he has something to say, he says it, if he doesn't have anything worth it to say, he says nothing. I have to say, I've met him, and he's a very nice man, he's quiet, and very observant. He is what I EXPECT an officer to behave like. He doesn't take himself too seriously, his rank wasn't what defined him, his actions did. He took care of his troops, and I hope he would take care of the Veterans the same way. I'm just saying, I think he's an okay choice because he isn't afraid to speak up when he needs to, and he's very honorable. He always wants to do the right thing, and nowadays, that's very unusual, and even more unusual in politics. ANYWAYS, I think he'd be alright.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I will give him every opportunity as well, mostly because I have no choice. I also agree that as a commander of troops, he was excellent. The DVA is not commanding troops, however. Determining the livelihood of veterans is far different than leading troops as well. As to his thoughts and attitude towards disabled veterans, I have no crystal ball. All I know is that he was severely injured, twice, as a very young officer in RVN. He held firm to the old military adage "suck it up and drive on" to become a full general. I am fearful that he will carry that attitude over to the DVA and urge the rest of us to suck it as well. That is fine, except that many of us have sucked it up for decades, and I for one, no longer have the mental capacity to suck it up.

I also disagree with Principi. I have read too many BVA and CAVC cases that occured during his tenure.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In reality we all will just have to wait and see. I hope he can manuver this rolling train wreck called the VA. I do agree with pete on Principi, I believe his hands were tied by the man.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Suck it up"!

John999 you hit the nail on the head. I have tried explaining to VA a number of times that "the reason that there aren't 50 visits to sickbay for this problem in my folder is because I was told to suck it up Marine!"

If the VA had more vets working there they might be more understanding of the military's attitude taken that "seeking health care is actually malingering". Ya know the 3 or 4 most outspoken members of my unit when it came to Marines going to sick call were the 3 or 4 that managed to get sent back to the states before we invaded Kuwait. Hmmmmmm.

I'll give the new guy the benefit of the doubt but unless there is wholesale change in the VA structure (eliminate bonus money for claims closed or whatever that I have read about on here) there will be no change in the claims process. Maybe the healthcare will get better, but not the comp and pension part. Oh.... and man did that guy have it right when he said we needed more troops to secure Iraq post conflict. Someone should take Rumsfeld and drop him in downtown Iraq with a kevlar, a flak jacket and a 9mm....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I stand by what I said. I think he will be honest, even if he has to deliver the bad news. Big Gov't Agencies have a life of their own, and sometimes even the leaders have no idea how bad things are going. Turning the VA around is going to require small turns so that it does not capsize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The new guy at the VA was a professional soldier. That means he takes orders. He will do what he is ordered to do. If Obama tells him to make a radical change then he will do it. If Obama tells him to just walk through it then he will do that. He had his chance to stand up and tell the Joint Chiefs that the war in Iraq was a misguided fiasco, and like a "good soldier" he kept his mouth shut. He was fired anyway. These guys serve at the pleasure of the President. They are not independent thinkers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use