Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

New Va Chief

Rate this question


dannydad

Question

fox news just reported that gen eric k shinseki will be appt as VA chief.do we know any thing about him????yes, he was fired by the whitehouse a few years back. BIG Question is he going to suport the troops???????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I kind of think he'll be alright. The only person I think would be perfect would be Jim Strickland, and that ain't gonna happen! SO, I think he'll be okay. I mean, he implemented some kind of sideways programs (hello, black beret) but he also did a LOT of good. Gubmint wanted to reduce the size of the military, he said NO. He isn't afraid to speak his mind, when he needs to. He won't be talking out of the side of his head like previous Secretaries. He doesn't talk to hear himself talk; if he has something to say, he says it, if he doesn't have anything worth it to say, he says nothing. I have to say, I've met him, and he's a very nice man, he's quiet, and very observant. He is what I EXPECT an officer to behave like. He doesn't take himself too seriously, his rank wasn't what defined him, his actions did. He took care of his troops, and I hope he would take care of the Veterans the same way. I'm just saying, I think he's an okay choice because he isn't afraid to speak up when he needs to, and he's very honorable. He always wants to do the right thing, and nowadays, that's very unusual, and even more unusual in politics. ANYWAYS, I think he'd be alright.

We should be angry, but kind; demanding, but polite; and firm but soft-spoken.

SouthernBelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I will give him every opportunity as well, mostly because I have no choice. I also agree that as a commander of troops, he was excellent. The DVA is not commanding troops, however. Determining the livelihood of veterans is far different than leading troops as well. As to his thoughts and attitude towards disabled veterans, I have no crystal ball. All I know is that he was severely injured, twice, as a very young officer in RVN. He held firm to the old military adage "suck it up and drive on" to become a full general. I am fearful that he will carry that attitude over to the DVA and urge the rest of us to suck it as well. That is fine, except that many of us have sucked it up for decades, and I for one, no longer have the mental capacity to suck it up.

I also disagree with Principi. I have read too many BVA and CAVC cases that occured during his tenure.

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In reality we all will just have to wait and see. I hope he can manuver this rolling train wreck called the VA. I do agree with pete on Principi, I believe his hands were tied by the man.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Suck it up"!

John999 you hit the nail on the head. I have tried explaining to VA a number of times that "the reason that there aren't 50 visits to sickbay for this problem in my folder is because I was told to suck it up Marine!"

If the VA had more vets working there they might be more understanding of the military's attitude taken that "seeking health care is actually malingering". Ya know the 3 or 4 most outspoken members of my unit when it came to Marines going to sick call were the 3 or 4 that managed to get sent back to the states before we invaded Kuwait. Hmmmmmm.

I'll give the new guy the benefit of the doubt but unless there is wholesale change in the VA structure (eliminate bonus money for claims closed or whatever that I have read about on here) there will be no change in the claims process. Maybe the healthcare will get better, but not the comp and pension part. Oh.... and man did that guy have it right when he said we needed more troops to secure Iraq post conflict. Someone should take Rumsfeld and drop him in downtown Iraq with a kevlar, a flak jacket and a 9mm....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I stand by what I said. I think he will be honest, even if he has to deliver the bad news. Big Gov't Agencies have a life of their own, and sometimes even the leaders have no idea how bad things are going. Turning the VA around is going to require small turns so that it does not capsize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The new guy at the VA was a professional soldier. That means he takes orders. He will do what he is ordered to do. If Obama tells him to make a radical change then he will do it. If Obama tells him to just walk through it then he will do that. He had his chance to stand up and tell the Joint Chiefs that the war in Iraq was a misguided fiasco, and like a "good soldier" he kept his mouth shut. He was fired anyway. These guys serve at the pleasure of the President. They are not independent thinkers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use