Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

New 100-percenter With Qs

Rate this topic


out_here04

Recommended Posts

A few of you responded to my questions over the past year when I was pursuing TDIU (total disability individual unemployability). As it turned out, back in late October, after my TDIU claim was judged, I was upped to 100 percent for anxiety, with more (non-payable...maybe one day...) percentage points acknowledged beyond that. The letter also said TDIU was "moot" because of the award (more on that later).

Anyway, I got a little over $13,000 in backpay dated to when I submitted my claim to VA in Dec 07 and about $2,800 from DoD after taxes for CRSD (concurrant receipt service disabled). I just told my wife I was messaging a guy who helped me (pete53) and she said "tell him I said 'thank you'''. So.. from both of us, thank you, Pete, and all the hadit.com vets who care enough to help others.

I didn't get permanent and total, the letter said, because I may improve. I do want to go back to college under the new 9/11 GI Bill. From watching the forum commentors, looks like TDIU or even PTSD were not the awards I was looking for after all, especially considering I want to eventually try to work from home or in my community (not having done anything since Feb 05) or go to school, or both.

I think the letter from VA said since I was awarded 100 percent for one SC, TDIU was "moot." I guess I could argue with them if I felt strongly about it, but I read on hadit once that "if you can work, then work," so I'm going with that advice for now.

The only question I had for Pete (who usually responds immediately, but must be busy holiday shopping today :P or any of you other hadit.com gurus is this:

Q) Is my 100 percent award for anxiety alone considered schedular, or is that for "permanent and total" DV's?

Q) The award letter said I was not permanent, but that since I was awarded 100 percent, the issue of TDIU was "moot." In the VA gobbledy-goop in this policy link it mentions the word "moot" but I'm not sure if that is what they were referring to.

http://www.va.gov/ogc/docs/1999/prc6-99.doc

7. This regulatory scheme is reflected in Veterans Benefits Administration Adjudication Procedure Manual M21-1 (M21-1), which directs adjudicators to make a decision as to whether the veteran meets the requirements for a schedular 100-percent evaluation before considering the issue of individual unemployability. M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.09a.(1) (Change 58, Jan. 31, 1997). There is no further directive to consider the issue of individual unemployability if the adjudicator finds that the veteran has met the requirements for a schedular 100-percent evaluation. The clear implication of this provision is that the adjudicator is to consider the issue of a schedular 100-percent evaluation first because, if he or she awards a schedular 100-percent evaluation based on service-connected disability, the issue of individual unemployability is moot. In other words, if the adjudicator finds the veteran to be totally disabled under the rating schedule, section 4.16(a) is not for application.

I'm still confused about whether or not that previous statement should lead me to believe I'm schedular. Now I'm wondering if I should not work after all, or face losing the 100 percent or having it decreased. This splitting of a hair is confusing as hell on a good day!!

I'm still going to use the GI Bill since veterans, unless 100 percent totally and permanently service-connected disabled, can't transfer it to dependents. I would love to pass it on to my daughter, but only those on active-duty on Aug, 9,'09 can do so, at this time. So, at age 47, off to school I go, I guess. I do intend to pass that oddity along to my Congressman who supported the New 9/11 GI Bill, despite others, even in DoD, arguing against the benefit. Maybe, eventually, they'll allow all or at least some disabled veterans to transfer this deserved benefit --that they may not be mentally capable of, or best suited for-- to their dependents, once a little more common sense sinks into the plan.

I look forward to any insight and advice. :blink:

Happy Holidays!

out_here04

out_here04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Congrats!!!! Glad that you won your claim and hope that Hadit made it easier for you.

Pete

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Congratulations. I am not sure of the answers. I admire you for going back to school as an full fledged adult! Consider ADA - Americans with Disabilities when it comes to the classroom if you need support, do ask. I too want to know the answer to your question. Schedular needs re-explained to me often, I dont always get things first, second or third time.

Yes, Mr. Pete is an awesome Hadit member!

Cg

A few of you responded to my questions over the past year when I was pursuing TDIU (total disability individual unemployability). As it turned out, back in late October, after my TDIU claim was judged, I was upped to 100 percent for anxiety, with more (non-payable...maybe one day...) percentage points acknowledged beyond that. The letter also said TDIU was "moot" because of the award (more on that later).

Anyway, I got a little over $13,000 in backpay dated to when I submitted my claim to VA in Dec 07 and about $2,800 from DoD after taxes for CRSD (concurrant receipt service disabled). I just told my wife I was messaging a guy who helped me (pete53) and she said "tell him I said 'thank you'''. So.. from both of us, thank you, Pete, and all the hadit.com vets who care enough to help others.

I didn't get permanent and total, the letter said, because I may improve. I do want to go back to college under the new 9/11 GI Bill. From watching the forum commentors, looks like TDIU or even PTSD were not the awards I was looking for after all, especially considering I want to eventually try to work from home or in my community (not having done anything since Feb 05) or go to school, or both.

I think the letter from VA said since I was awarded 100 percent for one SC, TDIU was "moot." I guess I could argue with them if I felt strongly about it, but I read on hadit once that "if you can work, then work," so I'm going with that advice for now.

The only question I had for Pete (who usually responds immediately, but must be busy holiday shopping today :P or any of you other hadit.com gurus is this:

Q) Is my 100 percent award for anxiety alone considered schedular, or is that for "permanent and total" DV's?

Q) The award letter said I was not permanent, but that since I was awarded 100 percent, the issue of TDIU was "moot." In the VA gobbledy-goop in this policy link it mentions the word "moot" but I'm not sure if that is what they were referring to.

http://www.va.gov/ogc/docs/1999/prc6-99.doc

7. This regulatory scheme is reflected in Veterans Benefits Administration Adjudication Procedure Manual M21-1 (M21-1), which directs adjudicators to make a decision as to whether the veteran meets the requirements for a schedular 100-percent evaluation before considering the issue of individual unemployability. M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.09a.(1) (Change 58, Jan. 31, 1997). There is no further directive to consider the issue of individual unemployability if the adjudicator finds that the veteran has met the requirements for a schedular 100-percent evaluation. The clear implication of this provision is that the adjudicator is to consider the issue of a schedular 100-percent evaluation first because, if he or she awards a schedular 100-percent evaluation based on service-connected disability, the issue of individual unemployability is moot. In other words, if the adjudicator finds the veteran to be totally disabled under the rating schedule, section 4.16(a) is not for application.

I'm still confused about whether or not that previous statement should lead me to believe I'm schedular. Now I'm wondering if I should not work after all, or face losing the 100 percent or having it decreased. This splitting of a hair is confusing as hell on a good day!!

I'm still going to use the GI Bill since veterans, unless 100 percent totally and permanently service-connected disabled, can't transfer it to dependents. I would love to pass it on to my daughter, but only those on active-duty on Aug, 9,'09 can do so, at this time. So, at age 47, off to school I go, I guess. I do intend to pass that oddity along to my Congressman who supported the New 9/11 GI Bill, despite others, even in DoD, arguing against the benefit. Maybe, eventually, they'll allow all or at least some disabled veterans to transfer this deserved benefit --that they may not be mentally capable of, or best suited for-- to their dependents, once a little more common sense sinks into the plan.

I look forward to any insight and advice. :blink:

Happy Holidays!

out_here04

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Why not go to school under Vocational Rehabilitation? I think it pays more. My only concern is since you are 100% the VA may see this as an improvement, and call you in for an exam. If you use the VA to put you through school they will have access to success as a student, and this may call into question any notion of P&T. I believe that as long as you are not working then your 100% is pretty safe, but you might want to check it out with others before you let the VA know you are using their dollars to get education that will make you employable. It seems like a great idea to me and makes sense from an economic point of view, but the VA has weird ideas. They like their 100% people to be basket cases if they have a mental problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use