Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

No Purple Hearts For Stress Cases

Rate this question


68mustang

Question

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

An interesting subject--I have seen this discussed on several other veterans' sites and the overwhelming consensus (including those with PTSD) is that the Purple Heart should not be given for PTSD. Some who have PTSD stated they would not accept the medal if it were offered. Of course this is not a scientific study.

Somewhat related to this subject is the minor movement to award the Purple Heart to those who

presumptively and otherwise, suffer from the effects of Agent Orange (I am SCed for AO exposure and the results).

I, along with many others, would not want a Purple Heart for Agent Orange exposure.

Just some personal opinions...

Ron

Edited by Ron II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Why is it that mental injuries are not held in the same esteem as physical injuries? If your injury is combat related why not a purple heart? Does s guy with TBI get a PH? Does there have to be blood? If I fall off a bunker during a rocket attack and break my back do I get a PH? If I die from AO exposure maybe DOW should give me an award like barrel of AO with an X through it. Guys were awarded PH's for getting a scratch, but someone with acute combat fatigue that turns into PTSD gets nothing but shame. Mental or emotional disabilites or injuries are still regarded as being a lessor injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Forget about Purple Heart for PTSD. It ain't going to happen, never, ever.

I have a new idea. An Orange Heart for those with Agent Orange (Herbicide) connected cancers, illiness etc. You would have to show that you were at least 10% SC from such exposure. Sound crazy??? Makes more sense to me than the Purple Heart. I would never consider wearing a Purple Heart for PTSD, an Orange Heart for S/C Cancer, I could see that.

What do you think?

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it matter one way or the otehr.. Its not going to put more money in anyone's pocket... and another medal is just another medal... once your out no one gives a tinkers damn what medals you earned and while a PH might impress a Kid, for an old coot like me it just means you forgot to duck........

(just an attempt at a little humor dont castrate me now :lol: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that mental injuries are not held in the same esteem as physical injuries? If your injury is combat related why not a purple heart? Does s guy with TBI get a PH? Does there have to be blood? If I fall off a bunker during a rocket attack and break my back do I get a PH? If I die from AO exposure maybe DOW should give me an award like barrel of AO with an X through it. Guys were awarded PH's for getting a scratch, but someone with acute combat fatigue that turns into PTSD gets nothing but shame. Mental or emotional disabilites or injuries are still regarded as being a lessor injury.

I don't know if any injury is held in "esteem." I suppose everyone has their own idea with regard to this subject; that is why I indicated "not a scientific study" and "just some personal opinions" in my post.

I agree with Teac about medals--I have quite a few since I was in the service for 23 years, but no one cares except my son and brother and that is quite OK with me.

Sooo...if a person wants a medal for PTSD and/or Agent Orange, then please lobby whomever to get it approved. What it all comes down to in the end, and this applies to me also, one knows what they did or did not do while serving irrespective of what ribbons and medals were placed on their chest.

I once talked to a recruiter who was reviewing his Official Military Personnel File (when they were all paper) and I asked him admiringly about the three Meritorious Service Medals he had already been awarded as a Staff Sergeant/E6. He told me that they were for meeting certain enlistment

quotas during his time as a recruiter. I'm not saying that all recruiters benefited from that "arrangement or process" and maybe he was exaggerating, but that was the perception he left with me--that is, he received those medals for just doing his job.

Again, it's likely no one really cares except one's family.

Oh, and yes I agree that that likely are Purple Heart recipients whose injuries were caused by events such as described in an earlier post.

Ron

Edited by Ron II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use