Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd Imo Letter

Rate this question


SFCTRUCKDRIVER

Question

ok,

hope this is the right way to do this.

for the more knowledgable of you on here, please give your opinion of this letter:

To whom it may concern,

This letter is written at the request of Mr..... who has been under treatment at this clinic since.....

Mr..... is being treated for PTSD and panic disorder with agoraphobia. This has been related to his services and combat experiences. He is currently being prescribed medication as well as pyschotherapy to help with these anxiety and mood issues.

At this point in the treatment, Mr... medications are being adjusted as this severe anxiety is limiting and interferes with his daily functioning.

call em at this number.....

The Dr is a licensed Pyschiatrist and has all those letters besides his name LOL

well,

is this a good or bad letter?

thanks

" The enemy controls everything, the roads, the bombs, they even own when and where they will attack. But the second they make the mistake to attack, we own them" ME, reference to insurgents in Iraq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Here is the post I referred you to:

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?show...ressors+defined

The CAR, and CIB denote direct combat participation.

But that doesnt mean a lack of these awards on the DD14 -doesnt cover combat participation-

The PH obviously means the veteran was wounded in a life threatening event-so PTSD is conceded with a PH and usually with receipt of the CIB ,CAB and CAR.

Many vets who were in the Vietnam War got DD 214s which did not reflect their all of their decorations and awards. If they file a DD 149 form, the gov will seek out any other awards due them and if they are found, the vet will receive a DD 215 that reflects these awards.

The indicent reports you have sound like strong evidence-still - the VA defines a stressor in a specific way as I put into the above link.

An incident or action action report can often include an entire unit or just part of a unit.

If you can put yourself at the scene of the incident and you have a valid stressor- as the VA defines stressors,

this would be excellent evidence to use.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta,

you are amazing in your knowledge. I have a memorandum signed by the commander which he wrote for all members on any convoy attacked which lists all Soldiers on the convoy, what happened and how each person reacted, did. I think he knew we would be dealing with the VA one day and wanted to give us extra bullets. He made sure we all had copies of the incident reports with our names etc on them. I am so thankful to him, i would never had thought about all that.....

" The enemy controls everything, the roads, the bombs, they even own when and where they will attack. But the second they make the mistake to attack, we own them" ME, reference to insurgents in Iraq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not to brag and to inform vets,

a new progrram called receipt of benefits at discharge is finally in place to help Soldiers getting a normal discharge (ets or retire) get the VA claim process done and begin receiving benefits within 90 days of ETS/retire date (that is if they dont deny everything) I hope this is what works for me. I have a letter from my PCP, therapist and Pysch dr along with proof of stressors and everything else. Does a CIB/CAB/CAR (award for combat action) prove stressor in combat? I have manifests, incident reports of my combat episodes to prove them, is that good enough?

SFC, This sounds like a great program for active duty soldiers, real great. I just hope they are pushing it in the faces of the troops so they all know. Most times It is very little known or "the word did'nt get out" and they get left without knowledge. I hope they all will be informed and get what is theirs. Agood medical check up that correctly diagnosis any problems they may have or might have in their future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
...a new program called receipt of benefits at discharge is finally in place to help Soldiers getting a normal discharge (ets or retire) get the VA claim process done and begin receiving benefits within 90 days of ETS/retire date....

Glad to learn about the new program, SFCTRUCKDRIVER. Our fellow Hadit member, "Meddac" gave us insight regarding the anticipated increase in VA workload, after the war is over, and our troops start to come home. Soon, I hope.

I am also glad to hear that you have copies of the incident reports. With Berta's and others help, and your efforts, SFC, you should do well with your claim. Best wishes.

Edited by Commander Bob 92-93

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes SPCTruckdriver has excellent evidence.

I sure didnt mean to suggest that PTSD comes only from combat- any traumatic event,such as personal assaults and many non combat situations- could all lead to PTSD.

For a vet claiming PTSD who was in combat however- the VA will assume they have experienced a stressor that is somehow due to combat.

My husband- as I might have mentioned before- was USMC Danang 65-66-in combat but his stressors were mainly due to

other situations during or after a firefight. His PTSD questionnaire had a list where he had to-by month-detail his year in Vietnam with any stressful events or describe his duties.For many months he just put "firefights as usual."and then he described the stressors in the months they occurred.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta,

funny thing is how he dealt with a firefight as a usual thing.. A very strong man..... You do his memory well ;)

" The enemy controls everything, the roads, the bombs, they even own when and where they will attack. But the second they make the mistake to attack, we own them" ME, reference to insurgents in Iraq

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use