Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hired Lawyer

Rate this question


gp747

Question

i am sick of the whole mess i hired lawyer sent papers today. these vso's act like you are a pile of s--t when you try to get info out of them.i am sick of it ,they are worthless and more likely are to damage your claim rather than help. legal help for vets

is who i got . they were kind enough to extend my time for holding my files and i decided on them ,michael viterna.

if i do not hire lawyer i am going to really get screwed . this vso s--t isn't worth a damn and i am tired of their condescending e-mails when i want a simple answer.

i have no faith in vso's anymore and do not see what purpose they serve they sure haven't helped me ,what i have got was on my own.

they should be barred and let lawyers step in from the start,that would stop the backlog. the lawyers could get it right from the start and cut down on appeals .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

That's interesting. I wonder how many Vets are hiring a lawyer. I have been considering it lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting. I wonder how many Vets are hiring a lawyer. I have been considering it lately.

I hired a lawyer. He sent me a contract. I signed it and mailed it back.

I'm to have no dealings with VA whatsoever.

This is so comforting.

Regional offices will have to use a central shredder

to shred documents and document what they shred. They will not have the advantage of DAV collusion.

Not in my claim at least.

>SCOOBY & I think 'SUNFIRE' threw me over the edge with my decision to hire an attorney. I was sitting on a fence!

Just hoping my reopened claim with special temporary handling procedures would make a difference in the

outcome of my claim.

Maybe I can look back on 3 wasted years and laugh about it someday? As soon as I talked to the lawyer,

I knew it was the right move for my claim.

CH

Edited by peacecindia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I chose to use an atty. also. I did my original claim myself and was awarded 30% for PTSD, I really studied on how to be succesful on being granted compensation, with help from family,ex-bosses, friends and MDS. However, last July I decided to call an atty. and see if they would represent me and they said yes. Prior to that I had allready filed an NOD, because I felt the 30% was to low and temporary. I did use vso's several times at the VAMC in Miami, but all they really did was e-mail forms and make copies, no law skills at all. I went with the atty., to take the pressure off of me somewhat and plus I am not very good in arguing with people and felt an atty. would give me the best edge in an appeal. Also I have never seen my c-file except when it was sitting on the desk at my CP exam. Atty requested that in Sept. 08, still no c-file. Also in Sept. 08 I was awarded SSDI and the atty. sent in a request for IU in Dec after I got my medical file on cd from SSA. My atty. is going for the full monty and supposedly its all in the hands of the DRO now. Don.t know if I will get the DRO hearing or decision, SOC or what. It has been going on 11mos. since I filed my first NOD. At this juncture I feel more comfortable with an atty watching my back and if all fails, I know I couldn't deal with this by myself. I would probably quit, because of the anxiety. And any VSO I am acustomed to isn't going to help you. Just my take on attorneys and VSO.

T&B

" In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a Congress"

- John Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting. I wonder how many Vets are hiring a lawyer. I have been considering it lately.

One thing to note, a lawyer will usually not take your case unless he/she evaluates it and feels that the case has merit. They do not want to waste their time if there is little chance of winning. The VSO's will advise you not to engage an attorney, but this is something that you need to evaluate for yourself and your case. For me, with the PTSD issues, I just cannot deal with the VA without getting enraged and basically hurting myself by cussing people out. It is better for me to have an attorney representing me. He evaluated my case and felt that I have a good one, so now I just sit back and wait. He also told me that he has a dedicated person at every VARO that only works with attorneys so things get speeded up a bit. Bottom line, do what you think is best for you!

Vietnam 66, 67/68. Combat Aircrewman doing search and rescue in N Vietnam. HS-6

Combat Vets Association

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are just starting to talk to a lawyer, and I think we will go with one also, just tired of all

the bull they put us through, that is how we feel :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know how you feel about quitting because the anxiety & stress

gets to be too much to deal with. .

Having a lawyer takes some pressure off me to prove anything to

an RO employee and allows me to relax.

I also signed an EAJA document so the lawyer can be paid if

he has to represent me and my claim at the Court of Appeals

after RO and BVA levels.

CH

I chose to use an atty. also. I did my original claim myself and was awarded 30% for PTSD, I really studied on how to be succesful on being granted compensation, with help from family,ex-bosses, friends and MDS. However, last July I decided to call an atty. and see if they would represent me and they said yes. Prior to that I had allready filed an NOD, because I felt the 30% was to low and temporary. I did use vso's several times at the VAMC in Miami, but all they really did was e-mail forms and make copies, no law skills at all. I went with the atty., to take the pressure off of me somewhat and plus I am not very good in arguing with people and felt an atty. would give me the best edge in an appeal. Also I have never seen my c-file except when it was sitting on the desk at my CP exam. Atty requested that in Sept. 08, still no c-file. Also in Sept. 08 I was awarded SSDI and the atty. sent in a request for IU in Dec after I got my medical file on cd from SSA. My atty. is going for the full monty and supposedly its all in the hands of the DRO now. Don.t know if I will get the DRO hearing or decision, SOC or what. It has been going on 11mos. since I filed my first NOD. At this juncture I feel more comfortable with an atty watching my back and if all fails, I know I couldn't deal with this by myself. I would probably quit, because of the anxiety. And any VSO I am acustomed to isn't going to help you. Just my take on attorneys and VSO.

T&B

Edited by peacecindia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use