Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Agent Orange, Lawyers Dream And Bureaucratic Sport

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

AGENT ORANGE, LAWYERS DREAM AND BUREAUCRATIC SPORT

Posted on February 14, 2009 by gordonduff

agentorange_01.jpgFROM LAWSUIT TO DENIAL TO PLAYING GAMES

WE KILLED AN ENTIRE ARMY WITHOUT A SINGLE BULLET

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER

Its Saturday morning and I have to read something else written by people who just don't know what they are talking about. This isn't even politics. Everyone is to blame. How could a country poison an army, watching them die a lingering death over years, see their children disabled, how?

How? This is the United States. We have TV, IPODS, Playstations and are now worrying about our bankers having their multimillion dollar bonuses paid from government welfare taken away while millions worry about money for their next supermarket run.sp3220090214115428.gif

We have been lied to about Agent Orange for 40 years and nobody has really cared and they aren't about to start. Some of the victims have those plastic flowers on graves in cemeteries, but most, as those who really fought in Vietnam were not so rich, sit in bags and boxes, ashes that sometimes look more likely dogfood than ashes, given to families that will never be able to afford a burial plot, marker stone or if the veteran was also a PTSD sufferer, maybe nobody is around that cares anymore.

Ask someone, anyone "in authority" about Gulf War Syndrome. Does it exist? Who died? What is it? What kind of people are we?

PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, THE WORST KIND

I got my Agent Orange physical in 1995. I was told I would need multiple joint replacements as I was showing extensive joint damage common to all agent orange sufferers. Then they found a tumor. It was diagnosed as Soft Tissue Sarcoma and I was advised to immediately start radiation and chemo at the VA Oncology center in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

I managed to survive the 90% odds that killed folks like actor Robert Urich (also from Detroit, one of my favorites). I lost one child whose death should be attributed to birth defects related to Agent Orange. I work to remain unaddicted to pain medication and remain as active as possible on a series of joints, some destroyed beyond recognition.

I don't receive one cent of compensation for any of this, not from the famed Agent Orange lawsuit I was a part of, not from VA claims made years ago nor do I receive any follow up treatment nor any real treatment of any kind. Welcome to the real world. Do note that I am also a VSO, Veterans Service Officer and know the system as well as anyone alive. I may be the least invisible Vietnam veteran in the country, next to John McCain, but it seems in "all the wrong circles." When I rail against corrupt bureaucracy, I have my reasons.

The VA is doing a wonderful and amusing job with agent orange victims. I get the Agent Orange Review in the mail, I get tests for prostate cancer (pronounce it P-R-O-S-T-A-T-E, not PROSTRATE...everyone screws this up) which, thus far, tell me I am not dying of that.

It took me 2 years to get an appointment with the VA for treatment for my joint pain. I got the appointment but no treatment. They told me to take aspirin. They did give me endless Xrays. I never heard back from them.sp3220090214115456_400.gif I found out why some time later.

Then, when visiting my local clinic for a gout flareup, the doctor pulled up my Agent Orange joint problem Xrays. They were years old, showed terrible damage BUT HAD NEVER BEEN SEEN BY A RADIOLOGIST, NEVER LOOKED AT, NO TREATMENT RECOMMENDED, NOTHING.

IN ANY CIVILIAN SETTING, EVERYONE INVOLVED WOULD LOSE THEIR MEDICAL LICENSES. HOWEVER, THE SAME GANG ARE KILLING OFF VETS ON A DAILY BASIS. NOW WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FIXING THIS PROBLEM BY PUTTING A PENTAGON GENERAL IN CHARGE. ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THAT....................

If it were only me it would be one thing. As most Vietnam vets know who go to "reuinions" and look around at who is there and who isn't, Agent Orange is "breaking up that old gang of mine." All my friends, the living ones, the few, are cancer survivors, some multiple cancers, many directly related to Agent Orange. One of my closest friends, someone I met while helping him as a VSO, had 4 Agent Orange cancers, his prostate removed and was getting a couple hundred bucks a month disability.

With PROPER advice and medical diagnosis he immediately went to 100%.

In some areas of the country, vets get joint replacements, full diagnosis and even disability payments they deserve. In many more areas, most areas, in fact, their medical problems are ignored and even lied about.sp3220090214115518.gif

The fact that Agent Orange destroys joints and brings on years of crippling pain was explained to me 14 years ago by VA medical officials but I have yet to read a single word about it in a publication. By the same measure of ignorance, the government should have simply ignored 9/11. If veterans had been on the planes or in the World Trade Center, we would still be waiting for the planes to land or wondering about that mysterious empty place in lower Manhattan.

We haven't even begun to discuss the Agent Orange victims from the spraying in the Korean DMZ. It seems, if you are poisoned by a "test spraying," you aren't sick. The games never end, the lies never end.

What Vietnam veterans and the other Agent Orange sufferers, not to include the millions of suffers in Southeast Asia, are supposed to do is "bite the bullet" and die quietly. We have been doing just that and doing it very well. Everyone seems pleased with the result with the exception of friends and family.

gduff_01.jpgFew of us are rich and important. Admiral Zumwalt's. son, however, was an exception. The admiral spoke up, put his ideas forward and his honor on the line. The military still admits nothing but at least someone stood up like a man.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4830

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I have never heard about AO causing joint damage, but anything is possible. It is an abomination that AO was sprayed on civilians in S.Vietnam and on our soldiers, and the government has dragged its feet waiting for us to die. S.Vietnamese civilians were supposed to be our allies in the fight for freedom and we poisoned them. Nice way to treat friends....Not! It is better to be an enemy of the USA. We first destroy your country and then pay to rebuild it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John -I have seen in over 10 years only one BVA decision that awarded a vet AO disability comp for a condition that was not on the AO presumptive list.

The vet had obtained three medical opinions as I recall and the last one came from an environmental medical physician.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got a 60% rating for a secondary condition of an AO presumptive disease. This is one way to sort of expand the presumptive list. Since the VA made DMII presumptive the possible number of conditions secondary to the AO disease has really increased the potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I believe that when we Vietnam vets have all but died off, the VA and the medical profession will decide that A.O. caused or contributed to a metabolic disorder that currently does not have an agreed upon name. Diabetes,and other problems, such as cardio & vascular disease are also symptoms, as are the symptoms and complications commonly associated currently with diabetes. The endocrinologists seem to be more and more treating diabetes as a symptom rather than a standalone disease. Currently, the VA takes just the opposite view, and usually successfully, charges a veteran "Co-Pay" for drugs that are associated with the treatment of diabetes if they are used to treat the complications rather than diabetes directly.

I got a 60% rating for a secondary condition of an AO presumptive disease. This is one way to sort of expand the presumptive list. Since the VA made DMII presumptive the possible number of conditions secondary to the AO disease has really increased the potential.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use