Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Exagerated Ptsd Symptoms

Rate this question


Gratefulmess

Question

I have recently taken the Minnesota Personality Test and in the review the doctor wrote that I showed "exagerated PTSD symptoms". I do not recall any questions that touched on PTSD since they were all True or False. Is this test really accurate and will it affect my appeal that I am seeking SC increase for PTSD which I am diagnosed with rather than the SC anxiety disorder that I am rated at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get a copy of the MMPI and have a psychologist evaluate the result. The MMPI is a pretty good test. I don't know what the term "exagerated PTSD symptoms" means. It could mean the doctor believes you are exagerating the extent of your symptoms or it could mean you have results that are higher for PTSD symptoms than so-called normal people. What the MMPI does is compare you answers to people who have definite dianoses of PTSD and other emotional disorders. The more your answers resemble theirs the more likely you have PTSD, or other disorders. Their are certain questions in the test to sort of weed out people who try to exagerate their symptoms, and also those who try to hide their symptoms. They are not all obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

will it affect my appeal that I am seeking SC increase for PTSD which I am diagnosed with rather than the SC anxiety disorder that I am rated at?

*You can only be rated for one MH disability and it should be the most disabling one.

MH disabilities can be comorbid or something like that, meaning they inter-mingle with one another,

such as depression & PTSD.

All MH disorders (except I think eating disorders) fall under the same Schedule for Rating Disabilities.

I would file for an increase under whatever diagnostic code I was currently rated under

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

you don't have anything to worry about, because you will not be rated for PTSD since you are already rated for anxiety disorder. This claim may raise red flags to the VARO, however, and they will most likely want to look at the current level of disability regarding your sc'd anxiety. Most likely, the following is what the psych was referring to:

link to article

90%, TDIU P&T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you don't have anything to worry about, because you will not be rated for PTSD since you are already rated for anxiety disorder. This claim may raise red flags to the VARO, however, and they will most likely want to look at the current level of disability regarding your sc'd anxiety. Most likely, the following is what the psych was referring to:

link to article

Thank you all for your replys. The reason I am concerned about the PTSD issue is because that is what I was originally diagnosed with and denied in 1996. My latest SC diagnosis after 5 years of appeals and a BVA hearing resulted in a C&P that was rated as "30% Social Anxiety". I retained a lawyer who is shooting for the PTSD diagnosis of which would be retro to 1996. I have been part of a PTSD group and currently have 1 on 1's with a VA Psychologist. This review makes me feel like they're saying I'm full of BS, and I have been nothing but honest. I had 3 denials and chose to take a BVA hearing to present my claim; and the judge verified all of my stressors which the VARO failed to acknowledge. I'm just feeling railroaded one more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"and the judge verified all of my stressors which the VARO failed to acknowledge"

Do you mean the JSRRC report that verified your stressors?

I see you are NSC in your profile-

is the 30 % social anxiety a NSC or a SC rating?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This recent finding may also be an opportunity for you to request an increase in your rating. Whether thru an NOD off the latest decision or formal request to the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use