Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Problems With Va Representatives

Rate this question


dlc1985

Question

I need some assistance with an appeal claim that was suppose to be filed after a new rating came through on my back and ankle. (November 2007) In February 2008, I spoke with my “new” representative (DAV) and sent a letter to him for him to send in the paperwork for the appeal of the current decision. I had periodatic communication with him and he basically told me it was slowing moving through the process. Well in October 2008 I opened a new claim for PTSD and after recently having my C&P it is at the rating board. To make a long story short I called the Representative to check the status of the appeal he was suppose to file and he got very flustered and said he would check into it after the rating board does their thing. I then called the 800 for VA information and they have informed me that an appeal was never filed. Any advise on what to do??? Currently 40% SC and no idea what I will get for my PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

If you re-open the claim that the appeal was never filed on-and if you succeed on that claim-then by taking the date of the EED and then comparing it to the date of the original claim the DAV messed up on-you will have an amount of damages.

Technically there are no 'damages' yet-there will be if that claim evcentually succeeds.

I won 2 of my claims 2 weeks before I gave deposition to my DAV rep and the DAV lawyer had deposed me already too.

When I whipped out my FTCA settlement I thought they would die-the rep said he didnt feel well and ran to the bathroom-the 1151 award -it was obvious that this too would be approved-

Therefore I had no damages at that point-no reason to contiue the lawsuit-

I got what I wanted (I Hope)

this rep had a problem dealing with women-

he had PTSD himself and treated widows of vets like second class citizens.He probaly treated female vets the same way.

He found out we are not easy victims and will willingly take steps to fight back when we get piss poor claims advise.

The dope probably gets AO comp too I think-

and he has a widow to thank for that comp -Beverly Nehmer.

Nehmer V. Veterans Administration One of the most important cases ever -involving Vietnam Veterans.

Beverly Nehmer cost the VA Millions with hlp from NVLSP of course so AO Vietnam Vets get properly compensated for their SC disability due to dioxin.

The DAV lawyer after this was all over- complemented me on the FTCA claim I won ,the way I did the deposition, and Exhibit list,and told me to get into Law School.

Lousy Reps should be brought to task. They hurt not only veterans but the veterans dependents too.They compromise the good reps and burn them out.

We have too many brave men and women serving US of A this very minute to allow these lousy reps to screw up their claims too.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not got a call from the DAV Rep and now he tells me that he did file the NOD when he was suppose to (which is a lie). He just opened a new claim. He thinks I am an idiot and that I do not know the difference. I am currently 40% SC rated which is why I got out medically from the military. I fell 50 feet while repelling on a training mission when the rope broke in two pieces. I broke my back and I have no ankle bone in my right ankle. (I know 20% each is a crying shame) I was young and dumb. This happened 23 years ago. I now suffer from PTSD and haven’t worked in over 5 years. I am diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder from the VA. I have completely linked it to my fall in the military so I don’t believe that a “Stressor” is an issue. I am going to take everyone’s advice and write- write- write. And then if I can, I am going to sue the He** out of the DAV. Thanks For your advise and help!!!

"Any advise on what to do???"

Yeah you might be able to Sue that bastard in a state court of law.

Or at the very least report him to the Headquarter Commander of the DAV-

Or better yet report him to whoever heads the Legislative National Service Officers division of the DAV.

If he cost you some money -he is liable for being sued-

And write to the OGC and tell them what happened.(CC that letter to the rep and to the DAV COmmander's office.

He put that claim into the crapper- it is gone, over, and now you have to re-open it-that dumb lazy ----!

He cost you your earliest effectiv date on th original claim.

No wonder he was flustered-he really messed up big time-

the ____ %$$%%^^^%$%))( SOB )

PTSD claim- do you have PH, CIB or CAR on your DD 214? If not can you prove the stressor nexus incident?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that sounds like an admission of guilt if he filed a 'new' claim (I bet he messed up on or never filed the NOD)-

if so he is liable for any future retro on the older claim that he has cost you-in a state court action

that %#$%#^#&@#(#*&& er

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to also file a cliam for major depressive disorder. Make them address both issues.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello DLC, This is so typical of the DAV. I would think that Berta has a good point on a possible plan of action for the Rep and maybe state court action. I am not sure but there may be ....may be a CUE that might be available due to the Rep and failure timeline. If the CUE could reopen a claim that has been closed , which from what you say it probably was , you may be able to continue with it. Berta would be able to know if there is a CUE backdoor to keep you in the loop. I had the DAV on my first claim yrs ago and they screwed it up , then came my reopen after several more decades......DUMB ME. I had a very good Rep from DAV...but he was so overworked , I could ever see him and got shuffled off to someone else locally who was also overworked and not very good at followups or what needed to come next. Somehow I got another state DAV supervisor that really screwed up on part of my claim. The right hand had no idea what the left hand was doing so this is typical for the DAV. Just as your claim has been forgotten , and then the DAV rep has now realized your claim, it is you the Veteran that now is in jeopardy with the VA. You have said that your rep has filed a "new" claim. Is this a new claim on your claims that are rated or did your rep reopen the claim? Was there any type of appeal? Did you get any letter from the VA or your rep telling you of a denial or did you ever get a VCAA letter or an SSOC 21-4138? It sounds like both the DAV and the VA have dropped the ball on your claim. I would try and see what some of the Hadit members say who have experience with this and for sure I would be looking for a new rep and new organization. You had some real good advice from the posters below and I also would suggest keeping those 3 ring binders going and everything gets documented and copied from all parties. I would not trust anyone from the DAV and that especially goes for the VA. I hope you can get some answers to this problem and let us know what happens to your followups and to some of the questions asked here. God Bless, NEVER GIVE UP. C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kept copies of everything I sent or handed to my rep to submit and I also submitted this directly to the VARO as well.

Anything I mailed had USPS tracking slips and I could prove (when I filed complaint against former reps) that I hand delivered stuff- with their appointment book showing I had been there.

I was surprised to learn here when October Incident was big news- that many got back from ROs any duplicates of evidence they had submitted- I sure never did-

I believe this vet will only attain his proper EED by making a BIG stink about the NOD.

I think only the DAV itself can change this situation.

And only at a higher level than what this vet is dealing this.

It is up to this vet.

How important is that EED to him?

I can post the headquarters info for the DAV ( I went directly to them years ago with a DAV rep problem)

and will if this vet wants to attempt to preserve his EED.

Or he can wait for denial and file NOD and get a lawyer and maybe the lawyer could help with the first NOD-because if he wins the lawyer will get 20 % of the EED anyhow.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use