Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Decoding C&p Language

Rate this question


navydoc2

Question

I received copies of my c&p physicals today for both my claims of increased depression and bilateral hearing loss with tinnitis. Here are the findings of the increased depression: I also have a TDIU claim

Axis I Major Depression

Axis II defer

Axis III See Med list

Axis IV Unemployment

Axis V GAF score is 50

The veteran cannot work due to anxiety, agoraphobia and worsened depression

The prognosis is guarded. He is mentally capable of managing benefit payments in his own best interest. Mentally, he occasionally has some interference performing activities of daily living because of his left Knee and depressive problems. He has difficulty establishing and maintaining effective work/school and social relationships because of his isolation. The best description of the claimant's current psychiatric impairmentis: psychiatric symptoms cause occupational and social imparment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent inability to perform occupational tasks although generally the person is functioning satisfactorily with routine behavior, self care and normal conversation. The above statement is supported by the following symptoms: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, chronic sleep impairment and mild memory loss such as forgetting names directions or recent events . He has no difficulty understanding commands. Based upon the examination, the claimant needs to seek follow up treatment. The claimant requires therapy and medication management. This information was conveyed to the claimant during the examination. The claimant does not appear to pose any threat of danger or injury to self or others.

Audiology: puretone

right

500hz 1000hz 2000hz 3000hz 4000hz b+C+

30 40 35 50 40 41.25

left

500hz 1000hz 2000hz 3000hz 4000hz b+C+

35 40 40 65 60 56.25

Diagnosis:

For the claimant's claimed condition of BILATERAL HEARING LOSS, the diagnosis is bilateral hearing loss. The subjective factors are the claimant report of hearing loss. The objective fators are audiometric findings.

For the claimant's claimed condition of TINNITUS, the diagnosis is bilateral persistent tinnitis. The subjective factors are claimant report of tinnitus. The objective factors are the claimant's subjective report.

For the right ear, the claimant has moderate, mixed (sensorinural and conductive) hearing loss. For the left ear, the claimant has a moderately severe mixed (sensorineural and conductive) hearing loss. If treated the problem will cause a change in the hearing threshold level because resolving any middle ear pathology can improve air conduction thresholds.

Answers to the questions from VA

In reference to the question "IT IS LESS LIKELY AS THAN NOT THAT THE VETERAN'S HEARING LOSS IS RELATED TO ACOUSTIC TRAUMA FROM COMBAT NOISE", due to the presence of an air-bone gap bilaterally with flat tympanograms normal ear canal volumes and absent ipsilateral acoustic reflexes.

It is as least as likely as not that the veteran's tinnitis is related to acoustic trauma from combat noise due to the reported time of onset and the noises inherentin those duties that are known to cause tinnitis.

If anyone can shed some light on these findings and what to expect from my RSO please help me. thanks in advance.

navydoc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yes but the statement, "The veteran cannot work" means "he cannot work." I don't see how the VA could spin this. This is a direct statement and if this doesn't incenuate Unemployable I don't know what would.

I think you have a great chance and will hear something soon. Looks like you won't get Tinnitus NOW but will in the future. Just keep up the fight and you will prevail.

Billy

you see how much of a crap shoot this is, I would have thought the bilateral hearing loss was the one that I would be denied and I would get the tinnitis. I'm glad to see everyone giving their advice all of it is good info. thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

WOW, Somebody used the crap shoot phrase. I just explained this term in a prior post. I learned this phrase from lawyers who represented me in several civil claims.

Good the doctor says you cannot work. Not so good that he did not in the next sentence explain in detail how your depression prevents you from working. As John says the report is inconsistent. Due to the fact that the statement is inconsistent I do not see a rater going with the worse case interpretation.

“The veteran cannot work due to anxiety, agoraphobia and worsened depression”

The weakness I see in this phrase is that he does not call it the “best” description. He saves the term “best” for his later detail. As such if I was a rater I would wonder if this was the medical opinion of the examiner or if the examiner was stating the veteran’s subjective opinion about his ability to function. The fact that he says treatment is needed makes me wonder if the doctor thinks that with treatment you would be able to return to work. It would be stronger if he recommended that you be evaluated for TDIU rather than referred to treatment.

Trying to get TDIU without prior hospitalization or ongoing treatment will be a battle. I have told veterans in the past that if you are trying to get 100% without being in treatment a single C&P will not be as strong as a treatment record in which the treating doctor says you can not work. A strong C&P is based on a review of treatment records. Without new treatment I would expect that the raters would pull the last decision and compare the current C&P to statements made in the previous decisions. They did this to me. The raters ran me through a ringer before I was TDIU. They requested statements from employers and potential employers. I had been denied both employment and voc rehab under labor law.

The best description of the claimant's current psychiatric impairmentis: psychiatric symptoms cause occupational and social imparment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent inability to perform occupational tasks although generally the person is functioning satisfactorily with routine behavior, self care and normal conversation.

I think baser is implying that this would be sufficient to get you a future exam for employability. Without any reported history of job lose or refusals from employers to hire you such an exam would be necessary. I do not see how this current C&P would be adequate to establish TDIU.

When reading this report I get the impression that you are not seeking work. I think it would be stronger if you reported a history of seeking work and not being able to obtain work for reasons caused by your depression.

Get back into treatment and get treating doctors to write reports. This has worked for several veterans with PTSD.

jmho

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW, Somebody used the crap shoot phrase. I just explained this term in a prior post. I learned this phrase from lawyers who represented me in several civil claims.

Good the doctor says you cannot work. Not so good that he did not in the next sentence explain in detail how your depression prevents you from working. As John says the report is inconsistent. Due to the fact that the statement is inconsistent I do not see a rater going with the worse case interpretation.

"The veteran cannot work due to anxiety, agoraphobia and worsened depression"

The weakness I see in this phrase is that he does not call it the "best" description. He saves the term "best" for his later detail. As such if I was a rater I would wonder if this was the medical opinion of the examiner or if the examiner was stating the veteran's subjective opinion about his ability to function. The fact that he says treatment is needed makes me wonder if the doctor thinks that with treatment you would be able to return to work. It would be stronger if he recommended that you be evaluated for TDIU rather than referred to treatment.

Trying to get TDIU without prior hospitalization or ongoing treatment will be a battle. I have told veterans in the past that if you are trying to get 100% without being in treatment a single C&P will not be as strong as a treatment record in which the treating doctor says you can not work. A strong C&P is based on a review of treatment records. Without new treatment I would expect that the raters would pull the last decision and compare the current C&P to statements made in the previous decisions. They did this to me. The raters ran me through a ringer before I was TDIU. They requested statements from employers and potential employers. I had been denied both employment and voc rehab under labor law.

The best description of the claimant's current psychiatric impairmentis: psychiatric symptoms cause occupational and social imparment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent inability to perform occupational tasks although generally the person is functioning satisfactorily with routine behavior, self care and normal conversation.

I think baser is implying that this would be sufficient to get you a future exam for employability. Without any reported history of job lose or refusals from employers to hire you such an exam would be necessary. I do not see how this current C&P would be adequate to establish TDIU.

When reading this report I get the impression that you are not seeking work. I think it would be stronger if you reported a history of seeking work and not being able to obtain work for reasons caused by your depression.

Get back into treatment and get treating doctors to write reports. This has worked for several veterans with PTSD.

jmho

I recieve treatment in the form of meds from my VA psychiatrist for the last three years, when I was working I had the medical insurance that allowed me to get other treatment. Unfortunately at that time I thought I was okay and did not seek treatment other than taking the meds the VA doc prescribed. I no longer have that luxury since I have not worked in a year and a half. I guess what surprises me is that I requested an increased rating due to depression and bilateral hearing loss with tinnitis. I did not ask for tdiu, after I submitted my paperwork for my claim, the VA told me I was eligible for IU, It would suck if they asked me to apply; I do and they deny my claim based on their own c&p agrees that I'm more depressed than the 30% I'm rated now. Do I really have to be suicidal and inpatient to prove that I'm unemployable or severely depressed. How does IU work anyway I applied for the increased rating in Feb 09, but lost my job in Feb 08 will they go back to my job loss or from date of the claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

VA Docs shy away from helping a Veteran with their claim. In the old days the VA would punish Docs who helped

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VA Docs shy away from helping a Veteran with their claim. In the old days the VA would punish Docs who helped

Yeah I didn't know that until I asked my psych doc to write a statement on my behalf to the board and he claimed that he could not do it due to VA rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Navydoc

Being an in-patient might really help your cause. Also, steady record of psychiatric treatment is very important for IU claims. You want documentation of your inability to work and your low level of functioning. You are getting good advice here. The VA knows that once you get IU you will never work again, so they make it hard to get it. I had been seeing a VA shrink for years and had a recent in-patient stay, and I still had to fight like cats and dogs to get IU even after I got SSDI, so it is not easy. You have to turn over every rock and jump through every hoop to get it. People here have been on SSDI for years and the VA still denied them IU or 100%, and they had to fight on to get it. Don't be discouraged because they make it hard and act stupid when you know you can't work due to your SC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use