Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C & P Records Problem

Rate this question


Kevin J

Question

I recently had a C&P exam done at the Orlando VAMC and when I go to the ROI office they tell me that they are not allowed to release the C&P medical records because it is still being rated. There is a sign on the wall that says per the St. Petersburg Regional Office that they can not give out the records. Is that allowed since it is a medical record, aren't we supposed to have unlimited access per federal law to our records? Can the regional office get away with this and what should I do to get my complete records? Has anyone else run into this problem and the Orlando office?

Thanks,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got a copy of a C&P exam for CAD from my VAMC. On the exam it said "Do Not Give a Copy of This Exam to the Veteran". The records clerk gave it to me anyway. I know they are weird about giving mental health C&P exams to vets. The VAMC insists on mailing them to me. That goes for mental health notes from my VA shrink. I love the consistency between VARO's. Each is its own little kingdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would send a copy of this to my Senator and say something like,

"Sir I thought you would like to know there are rules and regulations that aren't being followed at my local VAMC. On my exam is the statement (i would highlight) "Do not give a copy of this exam to the Veteran." According the VA Rules and Regulations any vet has the freedom to obtain a copy of medical records according the "Freedom of Information Act."

My VAMC is blatantly not following rules and regulations and should be known and looked into. I am submitting a copy of my exam for proof of my allegations.

DH

There's no reason we should not be able to get a copy of what we already know about ourselves. There is a reason this statement was in there and it's scary and infers a hidden agenda.

I got a copy of a C&P exam for CAD from my VAMC. On the exam it said "Do Not Give a Copy of This Exam to the Veteran". The records clerk gave it to me anyway. I know they are weird about giving mental health C&P exams to vets. The VAMC insists on mailing them to me. That goes for mental health notes from my VA shrink. I love the consistency between VARO's. Each is its own little kingdom.
Edited by darkhorse
crazy-dog.jpg&h=94&w=133&usg=__KOn1hLijeKDD3LwW2tzES4paAcQ=
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a rule or reg (I'll have to find it) that allows docs to preclude pts (both in the civilian world and our world) from getting copies of their mental health records if the docs feel it will make the pt's condition worse.

If anyone knows of the reg...feel free to post it...meanwhile, I'll do some digging. Rarely...very rarely, the pt can bypass this reg with a well-written FOIA request (FOIAs are different than a med records request--I used to be a FOIA manager); but even then you're likely to get a sanitized copy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the VA will not give you a copy than ask them to provide it to your Doctor and than they have to do it.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am pretty sure you have the right to all your medical records no matter if they are mental health records or not. However, the VA will stall on handing them over unless you do it like Pete says. Physical and mental illness are supposed to be treated just the same. We are supposed to get parity of treatments as well from insurance companies. If you can get 30 visits for PT you should get 30 visits for a mental health condition. The insurance companies (BC/BS) are already using every trick to get around the law. My shrink says they are insisting on preauthorization for mental health treatments. They never did that before this law came out recently.

I use workers compensation for my private mental health so I am not affected by this yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's one instance:

[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 45, Volume 1]

[Revised as of October 1, 2002]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 45CFR164.524]

[Page 728-731]

TITLE 45--PUBLIC WELFARE

AND HUMAN SERVICES

PART 164--SECURITY AND PRIVACY--Table of Contents

Subpart E--Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information

Sec. 164.524 Access of individuals to protected health information.

(a) Standard: Access to protected health information. (1) Right of

access. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of

this section, an individual has a right of access to inspect and obtain

a copy of protected health information about the individual in a

designated record set, for as long as the protected health information

is maintained in the designated record set, except for:

(i) Psychotherapy notes;

(ii) Information compiled in reasonable anticipation of, or for use

in, a civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding; and

... (edited for space)

(3) Reviewable grounds for denial. A covered entity may deny an

individual access, provided that the individual is given a right to have

such denials reviewed, as required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section,

in the following circumstances:

(i) A licensed health care professional has determined, in the

exercise of professional judgment, that the access requested is

reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the

individual or another person;

(ii) The protected health information makes reference to another

person (unless such other person is a health care

[[Page 729]]

provider) and a licensed health care professional has determined, in the

exercise of professional judgment, that the access requested is

reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to such other person; or

(iii) The request for access is made by the individual's personal

representative and a licensed health care professional has determined,

in the exercise of professional judgment, that the provision of access

to such personal representative is reasonably likely to cause

substantial harm to the individual or another person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use